Statistical differences were interpreted as significant at P < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at P < 0.01 (**).
Excerpts
For the upper limb on the operated side we found highly significant differences between measurements taken at subsequent time points with respect to the range of extension, internal rotation, external rotation and abduction ( p ≤ 0.01), upper limb circumferences: 10 cm above the lateral epicondyle ( p = 0.0000), 10 cm below the lateral epicondyle ( p = 0.0000), and in the mid-metacarpal region (without the thumb) ( p ≤ 0.014).
Moreover, the velocity of movement in VPA group increased with highly significant (p<0.01).
At discharge, ODI scores indicated highly significant improvement in patients’ quality of life in both groups ( P < .01) ( Figure 3 ).
The highly significant associations (p-value < 0.01) found between academic qualifications and respondents’ understanding of advanced SC-related concepts, including the risk of immunogenic reactions, the immunomodulatory properties of SCs, and the feasibility of preserving SCs for future use, suggests that a deeper academic foundation promotes a more nuanced understanding of the complexities and technical aspects of SCs science.
The Pearson’s correlation between final concentrations of Ni in soil compared to Ni in tomatoes is highly significant (r = 0.83 P < 0.01).
Compared to group D, the level of BG in group H decreased regularly from (25.38 ± 2.21) mmol/L to (18.01 ± 2.53) mmol/L during five weeks, which showed extremely significant hypoglycaemic effects ( p < 0.01) at the 3rd week.
Furthermore, correlation analysis between the expression of the 13 identified genes and the levels of the 8 metabolites revealed highly significant correlations between FcMS (FC11G00178) and 3 of the metabolites, each with correlation coefficients (r) of at least 0.95 ( p < 0.01).
Differences between the exclosure and adjacent grazing land in woody species richness, diversity and evenness were highly significant (p < 0.01).
Interestingly, 5 days later, they continued to increase until 9 days, displaying highly significant differences compared to culture plates ( p < 0.01).
Findings showed that high-fat diet caused highly significant ( p < 0.01) upregulation of three target genes (PPARγ, SLC10A2, and Collα1), compared to the calibrator (normal rats), while causing insignificant downregulation in PNPLA2 gene (0.45 ± 0.07) and upregulation in CFD gene (2.01 ± 0.14).
A highly significant difference in push-out bond strength scores ( P < 0.01) was found between all the study groups except Group IVA versus Group IIIB that showed an insignificant difference ( P > 0.05).
The unified model with fMRI-based characteristic path length as outcome variable and characteristic path length from all 4 EEG bands as regressors had a borderline significant p value of 0.052, with only the delta EEG-based characteristic path length showing a significant effect of p = 0.01 (Table 6 ).
The factor type of stimulus was highly significant in subjects A ( F 1,118 = 764.3, p < .01) and C ( F 1,118 = 42.5, p < .01) but not in subjects B ( F 1,118 = 2.92, p = .09) and D ( F 1,118 = 0.51, p = .48).
Notably, NMOSD couples exhibited more highly significant correlations (p<0.01).
The mean change in lower anterior facial height observed was −1.90 mm with a standard deviation of − 0.80 mm, which was highly significant ( P = 0.010).
All the pairwise comparisons between the methods were highly significant (p-value < 0.01) based on a t-test , except for the comparison between GS and JGRA marker effect for VSK trait (Fig. 3 A).
Highly significant reductions were observed for AME (at p < 0.01), indicating an especially strong biocontrol effect on these mycotoxins.
It is worth noting that five themes showed highly significant differences (with values of p < 0.01) between the two settings. 3.3.
a near significant trendp > 0.01
This effect was observed as a near significant trend ( p > 0.01) using the conservative (raw) data and a significant effect based on the more sensitive (%) data.
The improvement in Group MM was highly significant ( P = .01), while Group PM also had significant improvement ( P = .04).
The differences between oxygen consumption of population H and L of 5 × 10 5 cells were statistically highly significant from 5 h to 24 h of cultivation ( P < 0.01) and significant between 2 and 5 h ( P < 0.05).
Differences were significant when * P < 0.05 and highly significant when ** P < 0.01 or *** P < 0.001.
Exploring the relation between BCG vaccination scar and TST, results showed a highly significant relation ( P =.01), meaning that those with a BCG scar (18, 8.2%) had a much lower chance of a positive TST than those without a BCG scar (17, 22.4%) ( Table 2 ).
The interaction of STEC isolate by antimicrobial treatment was highly significant for describing STEC survival on hide pieces ( p < 0.01) ( Table 2 ).