Regarding the OARs, the overlapping volume of the rectum with the PTV displayed a decreasing trend in automated planning compared to manual planning ( p < 0.01), while no significant differences were noted in the overlapping volumes of the bladder and small bowel with the PTV. 3.4.
Excerpts
Differences were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05 and highly significant if p <0.01, p <0.001, p <0.0001, marked in the figures with *, **, *** and **** respectively.
The data in the light gray boxes are highly significantly correlated to the lin- ear trend (p < 0.01), and for the data in the dark gray boxes a very highly significant correlation exists (p < 0.001).
In the results, different capital letters indicate highly significant differences ( P < 0.01), different lowercase letters indicate significant differences ( P < 0.05), and the same letter indicates non-significant differences ( P > 0.05) within the same line.
In addition, the correlation between the quantity of ethanol and scar tissue area was highly significant ( P < 0.01, r 2 = 0.6), whereas the values for the gradient deviation ( P = 0.10, r 2 = 0.34), Δ V max ( P = 0.12, r 2 = 0.31), as well as the gradient at rest ( P = 0.27, r 2 = 0.17) were not significant.
Differences between AKI and controls were statistically highly significant for both GLCM indicators (p < 0.01).
Time to maximum grip velocity: A clearly significant decreasing trend was observed for the data series collected before the TMS ( C = .72; p < .01).
An overall trend towards reduced dressing change times was observed in the moist dressing group compared with the gauze dressing group (SMD −3.65, 95% CI −5.34 to −1.97, p < 0.01; I 2 = 96.48%) (Figure 6 ). 3.6 Wound site infection rate Five trials (293 participants, 33.83%) assessed the wound site infection rate after treatment with moist dressing.
The fat weight showed a highly significant positive correlation with body weight in both males and females (r = 0.92, and 0.86 in males and females, respectively; P < 0.01), similar to meat production ( Figure 2 C).
However, there were 13 transcripts that showed a nonsignificant trend of differential expression between groups (FDR = 0.1604 and unadjusted p < 0.01; green points in Figure 5 ).
The bars indicate the standard error of the mean and *** that data are highly significant with a p <0.01.
Highly significant variations ( P < 0.01) in the assessed parameters were observed across the investigated treatments.
Results of the LMM analysis ( Table 2 ) showed that participants in the intervention group had a highly significant reduction in stress levels compared with the control group (p = 0.01, d = 0.15) after the intervention, which was maintained at the 19-week follow-up (p < .001, d = 0.18).
Figure 1 shows the highly significant quantitative correlation between HBeAg and HBV DNA levels on the log scale (R 2 = 0.658; P < .01).
IL-1β expression tended to be higher at 3 dpi in Groups 2 and 3, whereas it showed a decreasing trend over time in the other groups ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 6D ).
Output was limited to a maximum of 200 terms, and highly significant (p < 0.01) terms were retained.
Based on the correlation analysis of differential genera and metabolites in the wild and captive Hainan macaques, Weissella showed a highly significant positive correlation with coumarins and derivatives ( P < 0.01, r > 0.3), and Odoribacter showed a significant positive correlation ( P < 0.05, r > 0.2).
However, cellobiose activity differed significantly, with adult gilts exhibiting higher levels than the other groups ( p < 0.01), weaned piglets had significantly lower intestinal fibrous disaccharide activity compared to fattening pigs and adult gilts ( p < 0.01), In addition, highly significant differences were shown between growing and fattening pigs ( p < 0.01). 3.2.
The results of the statistical analysis showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.01) between each experimental group and the control group ( Figure 5 ).
In RStudio, the t -test was used to check whether there was a significant difference (significant: p < 0.05; extremely significant: p < 0.01) [ 29 ].
Bowker's test of symmetry for these responses ( N = 80) showed that there was a highly significant shift from pre- to postworkshop in the likelihood that participants would speak up (χ 2 [df5] = 42, p < .01).
Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 level and extremely significant at p < 0.01 level. 3.
As shown in Table 5 , the Adonis test confirmed that the clustering differences among the groups were extremely significant ( P < 0.01). 3.9.
Correlation analysis between dominant fungal genera and soil physicochemical properties revealed ( Table 3 ) significant positive correlation ( P < 0.05) between the relative abundance of Gibberella and pH, and highly significant positive correlations ( P < 0.01) with total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, organic carbon, and available phosphorus.
The results revealed that both the pink and purple modules exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with monoterpene M1 (p<0.01), while the black module showed a significant negative correlation with monoterpene M5 (p<0.05).