The HR of the lansoprazole group relative to the gefarnate group was 0.2510 (95% CI 0.1400–0.4499), which implied a 74.9% risk reduction, and the difference was highly significant (log-rank test, P < 0.0001) (Table 2 ).
Excerpts
The fixation index among the two regions is almost insignificant ( F CT = −0.00834, P ≤ 0.0001), indicating that there is gene flow between regions.
During the breathing exercises, there was a highly significant initial difference in heart rate response between hyperventilation and diaphragmatic breathing (p<0.0001).
The difference in response after booster dose between the undetectable and low Ab group was highly significant (42% vs. 87%, p=0.0001).
Limited growth was noted for average piriform sinus length (AveragePSLength; p = 0.0768), but growth in Velum Length was highly significant ( p < .0001).
This evident shift in median emergence time is highly significant (Friedman two-way ANOVA, p <.0001).
The results displayed that the model of COPs yield was highly significant at a level of p < 0.0001, whereas the lack of fit was not significant ( p = 0.9985 > 0.005).
Correlation between reference and MRI-based temperatures are highly significant (all p -values < 0.0001).
A chi-squared statistical test shows this difference in frequencies to be highly significant (chi-square score 43.2, P value <0.0001).
It also displayed blood culture to be highly significant in the diagnosis of typhoid fever (p<0.0001).
We observed a highly significant association for the model of (βATP + PCr)/iP vs. the CNR values (putamen, caudate, globus pallidus, and thalamus) (P < 0.0001) (see Table 1 ).
Bernoulli GLMM analysis of the effect of forest fragment size on tree hyrax singing indicated that “forest size” was a highly significant covariate in tree hyrax singing probability (P-value < 0.0001) (Table 1 e, Fig.
In contrast, Nrf2 knockdown revealed a suppressive effect on cell proliferation, compared with NTC and Keap1 RNAi, respectively, which became highly significant at 48 h ( p < 0.0001, Figure 4 b).
The statistical difference in number of accessory genes between MRSP and MSSP isolates as measured using Welch’s t -test was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with MRSP isolates harboring an average of more than 150 accessory genes compared to their MSSP counterparts ( Figure 3C ).
The observed highly significant decrease of CD4 + T cell numbers in the spinal cord ( p < 0.0001) versus the statistically significant but small differences of T cell numbers in the spleen, however, suggest that local alternations may be responsible for improved functional recovery.
Consistent with this, there was a highly significant correlation between the levels of anti-Sm near the time of biopsy and at the time of patient enrollment ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 D).
As shown in Table 3 , it was apparent that the model was extremely significant (p < 0.0001) for quantification of extraction yields of GLA (Y 1 ) and ISL (Y 2 ).
+ 0.0817 X 2 X 4 + 0.0405 X 2 X 5 - 0.0402 X 2 X 6 - 0.2873 X 3 X 4 - 0.1011 X 3 X 5 - 0.1967 X 3 X 6 - 0.0283 X 4 X 5 + 0.2186 X 4 X 6 - 0.0289 X 5 X 6 - 0.769 X 1 2 - 0.2811 X 2 2 - 1.64 X 3 2 - 1.13 X 4 2 - 0.2342 X 5 2 - 0.0627 X 6 2 # The ANOVA results ( Table 2 ) indicated that the model was highly significant ( F = 16.76, P < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit ( P = 0.2443), confirming model adequacy.
The AMOVA analysis showed that although the most of the genetic diversity was attributable to differences among individuals within populations (85.78%), the φ ST values among populations were highly significant ( φ ST = 0.141 p< 0.0001) confirming the existence of population differentiation.
reported a highly significant difference in ocrelizumab groups (P<0.0001) for a total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 versus placebo [ 19 ].
The reduction in EASI scores was statistically significant as early as week 2 ( P = 0.0003), with a highly significant improvement noted by week 12 ( P < 0.0001) [ Figure 1a ].
Using a more sophisticated haplotype-based method (focusing on ∼21% of the genome), we found 24 highly significant ( P < 0.0001) haplotype blocks suggestive of selective sweeps.
Our univariate logistic regression analysis shows a highly significant relationship between CT-FFR ML and stress perfusion CMR, with Chi 2 = 47 ( p < 0.0001).
Significance was indicated as follows: not significant (ns): P ≥ 0.05; significant: * P = 0.01 to 0.05; very significant: ** P = 0.001 to 0.01; extremely significant: *** P = 0.0001 to 0.001; and extremely significant: **** P < 0.0001.
SUV max and TBR GGO/consolidation There were highly significant group-wise differences ( p < 0.0001) across both the COVID-19 and BSTI classifications.