It was observed that there was a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001) between individuals having MS with and without family history.
Excerpts
Overall, the test for subgroup differences was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), confirming that the type of intervention substantially influences outcomes.
The median (IQR) growth rate of children pre- and post-tests were −4.0 (−5.4–−2.1) SDS and 0.1 (−1.9–1.4) SDS respectively, a difference highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3B ).
The model-based algorithm picked up 1314 of these missed cases, at a cost of 502 additional false positives, and provided highly significant incremental information (p<0.0001) within this group of patients.
All heritability estimates were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Whole mite extract responses also differed between groups, with Aca s exhibiting a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001), while Tyr p showed a moderate but notable difference ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 2a ). 3.3.
Highly significant hyperinsulinemia ( p < 0.0001) was noted in diabetics.
For stem diameter, the Treatment effect was not significant across corrections (Greenhouse–Geisser: MS = 6.23, F = 1.27, p = 0.332), but the effect of Time was highly significant (MS = 83.02, F = 123.96, p < 0.0001), showing consistent increases in stem diameter across weeks.
This time, the log-rank statistic comparing the survival times of the two clusters was highly significant ( p = 0.0001).
However, extremely significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were observed between the presence and absence of Mn 2+ .
The results were concluded to be statistically significant with P < 0.05, very significant with P < 0.001, and highly significant with P < 0.0001.
Although the linear effect of saponin concentration was not statistically significant (F = 3.39, p = 0.0814), the quadratic effect was highly significant (F = 117.50, p < 0.0001), confirming the curvature of the response.
Approximately 33.3% of all MC17 isolates were resistant to 5FC and this was found to be highly significant ( p <0.0001, Chi-square; p = 0.0005, Fisher exact test) when compared to the presence of 3.9 and 9.5% of resistant isolates in MC8 and MC3, respectively.
As expected, we observed a highly significant inverse correlation between CAG repeat numbers and the AAO in a multivariate linear regression analysis ( P < 0.0001), both for the individual sub-cohorts (Supplementary Table S9) and combined cohorts of MJD patients (Fig. 1 e; Table 2 ; Supplementary Table S9).
Both these values were highly significant ( P << 0.0001), as the 9,999 randomized data sets had from 558 to 749 steps for ordered parsimony and from 27.49 to 37.12 steps for our weighted step matrix.
θ ST [ 45 ] among all populations was moderate but statistically highly significant (0.069, p < 0.0001; temporal samples from the same populations were pooled).
There were moderately significant positive correlations between VF and MAF [right eye (r s = 0.631, p = 0.0001), left eye (r s = 0.633, p = 0.0001)] and BAF (r s = 0.580, p = 0.0001). 4.
This difference in the pattern of discordant classification in the Joslin and FinnDiane cohorts was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The HR of the lansoprazole group relative to the gefarnate group was 0.2510 (95% CI 0.1400–0.4499), which implied a 74.9% risk reduction, and the difference was highly significant (log-rank test, P < 0.0001) (Table 2 ).
Furthermore, the variance analysis (ANOVA) presented in Table 4 disclosed that the quadratic model was exceedingly significant at P < 0.0001 for the estimation of phenolics from JATE.
Following stimulation of C3H/HeSn DCs with adjuvant CpG-oligonucleotides, the production of IL-12 was comparable to that achieved following BCG stimulation and was highly significant compared to control cultures ( P <0.0001) ( Figure 6A ).
This linear relationship is further supported by the highly significant PGS × context interaction term ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ).
One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of treatment ( p <0.0001).
The Model F-value of mono-EMC17, mono-SMC25 and dual-species was 169.72, 158.20 and 132.70 which depicts that the model is valid and predicted quadratic response are highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
In sharp contrast, the Post-booster (7 days) group exhibited a dramatic elevation in Tfh cell percentage relative to the other three groups, with the difference reaching extremely significant statistical levels ( P < 0.0001, Fig. 6 C).