Excerpts

In leprosy nerves, the extent of LAM and MAC immunoreactivity was robust and significantly higher in multibacillary compared to paucibacillary donors ( p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively), with a highly significant association between LAM and MAC in the diseased samples ( r = 0.9601, p = 0.0001).

2 a), and differences among feeding groups were highly significant (ANOVA F 7, 88 = 292, P < 0.0001 for FB NY ; F 6, 54 = 204, P < 0.0001 for MC SC ).

The telomere length differences measured between AD and non-AD and between mild, moderate and severe AD were highly significant ( Table 2 , p < 0.0001) as non-caregiver controls were participating in the current study.

Survival analysis across all counties showed a highly significant difference in mortality between exposed and unexposed (control) individuals (HR ≈ 0, P < 0.0001), confirming the impact of permethrin exposure across both species.

VRS showed an increasing trend with the severity of care, p < 0.0001.

When comparing the medians (interquartile ranges) of the 2 GA-T trials performed by the participants, no significant difference was noted, although the time to complete the second trial was shorter [365 (260-545) s vs 360 (250-540) s, P=0.81]; highly significant intraobserver agreement (P<0.0001) was observed between the measurements of the 2 GA-T trials (ICC=0.97 and 95%CI: 0.96-0.99).

A Wilcoxon signed-rank test on absolute prediction errors (APE) confirmed that this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A total of 210/337 genes demonstrated negative correlation coefficients with all metallothioneins (F, G, H, M and X), giving a highly significant P value ( P <0.0001).

However, there were a significant increase in DBP and an extremely significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in the pulse rate after the intervention. 3.3.

In this example, the reductions in response size relative to rest were statistically highly significant in all three phases of rearing (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001, F (3,135) = 21.77; Dunnett's multiple comparison test comparing each phase; p < 0.01 for all comparisons).

When hair follicle harvested from lower occipital donor area of Group ’A’ and Group ’B’ patients were compared and we observed highly significant statistical difference between these two groups (df = 10, t = 18.77, P < 0.0001) [ Table 2 ] Average FTR from total scalp donor area in Group ’A’ and Group ’B’ patients was 5.10 and 3.10, respectively [ Table 4 ].

In addition, there were highly significant correlations in the immunostaining scores between these two-paired sets ( r >0.90 and P <0.0001, for each protein).

Parental obesity was a highly significant cross-sectional correlate of offspring BMI (β regression coefficient per one parent with obesity β = 0.86 [SE 0.11], P < 0.0001).

Unlike the other families, species richness was higher in the first survey, highlighting a highly significant difference between the two periods ( t = 223.2, p << 0.0001).

The difference between the two cell types was highly significant (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 5 c).

The main effect of Age was highly significant with respect to accuracy (Figure 3 , F(1,58) = 11.9, p < 0.0001).

Although interfamily variation was highly significant at both temperatures (all P < 0.0001, Table 2 ), the amount of variation at 7°C appeared to be greater overall than at 14°C (average range in time to hatching = 2.4 days at 14°C vs. 6.3 days at 7°C; stage at hatching = 0.87 vs. 1.6; size at hatching = 0.77 vs. 1.04).

Interestingly, creatinine and urea levels correlated positively and highly significant ( r = 0.856, p < 0.0001).

Following an 8‐week intervention, the experimental group exhibited a BMI reduction of 0.73 ± 0.07 (Figure 3b ), in marked contrast to the control group's increase of 0.216 ± 0.08, demonstrating a highly significant intergroup difference ( p < 0.0001).

In the medium group size (6SC), the CNTRL + M + 6SC showed a highly significant increase in mirror bites compared to HGRY + M + 6SC ( P < 0.0001).

The seroprevalence rates in dogs increased linearly as the sampling area approached the sites of human cases, as confirmed by the highly significant Cochran-Armitage test for trends in proportions (p < 0.0001), which used a score of 1 for France, 2 for major towns, 3 for Mekambo, 4 for villages from the disease-epidemic area without human cases, and 5 for villages from the Ebola virus–epidemic area with human cases ( Figure 2B ).

The trophozoites treated with nitroxoline showed a highly significant decrease in ATP levels compared to the negative control, p < 0.0001 (****) ( Figure 7 ).

Evaluating the results by applying repeated measures of variance demonstrated a highly significant difference in individual change between the two groups ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 b).

Area under the curve (c-statistic) was 0.98, which was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Statistical analysis confirmed that the change is highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test; n = 5 each for WT and KO).