We noted that while most gRNAs targeting X-linked repeats did not substantially affect the sex-ratio, the Muc14a_6 gRNA induced a highly significant male-biased sex-ratio of 61.5% (p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
Most notably, however, statistical analyses revealed a highly significant effect of extracellular calcium concentration on post‐hypoxic LTP such that higher levels of calcium produced enhanced potentiation ( F 2,29 = 18.023, P < 0.0001, ANOVA, Figure 8a,d ).
Carotenoids A highly significant quadratic response surface model ( F value = 34.51, p < 0.0001) was developed to describe carotenoid production by N . intermedia , demonstrating exceptional explanatory power with an R 2 of 0.9780 and an adjusted R 2 of 0.9496, whereas a high adequate precision ratio of 18.88 confirmed its reliability for prediction (Figure 3 ).
The difference of ciliostasis was extremely significant between aYN vaccinated groups and unvaccinated groups ( P < 0.0001). 3.2.3.
For retention time, both organic phase volume and flow rate, along with their interaction and quadratic terms, were highly significant (F = 253.91, p < 0.0001), yielding an excellent model fit (R 2 = 0.9914).
Target correlation was a highly significant predictor for reaction times across all models and both datasets ( p < 0.0001; summary tables for the GAMs can be found in the Supplementary Materials).
In the treatment group, the mean change in the primary endpoint (hours daily OFF time) from baseline to EoS was highly significant [−1.07 (SD 0.78) vs. + 0.09 (SD 0.35), p < 0.0001] ( Table 3 ).
In contrast, a highly significant difference in IgG2a response (Th-1) was observed in the sera of mice vaccinated with both Ad5.MERS-S and Ad5.MERS-S1 (**** P < 0.0001 at weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) ( Fig. 3 B).
In contrast, cells expressing E2814-CAR exhibited highly significant differences ( F (7, 16) = 127.2703, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.9824; Table 3b).
Correlations between MVP and Other Markers/Proteins of Inflammation A highly significant correlation was found between MVP levels and Neu, CRP, and IL-6 (r = 0.48; p < 0.0001, r = 0.42; p < 0.0001, r = 0.36; p = 0.0004, respectively; Figure 7 ), whereas a less-significant correlation was demonstrated between MVP levels hBD-1 (r = −0.25; p = 0.0170).
The log-rank test confirmed highly significant differences across the three categories ( p < 0.0001).
LPS administration induced a highly significant BW loss in both strains (Treatment: F (1,36) = 175.8, p < 0.0001; Strain: F (1,36) = 20.18, p < 0.0001; strain × treatment: F (1,36) = 3.80, p = 0.06).
Results were considered as not significant (ns) when P > 0.05, significant when 0.01 < P < 0.05 (*), more significant when 0.001 < P < 0.025 (**), very significant when P < 0.001 (***), or extremely significant when P < 0.0001 (****).
The inter-group differences between the human and Zymo mock were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The analysis revealed a highly significant effect of sample source on Vibrio detection ( χ 2 = 38.78, df = 3, adjusted p < 0.0001).
From baseline, the respiratory frequency in the MPA group was significantly lower than that in other groups ( P < 0.001), with the difference remaining highly significant as the MCH concentration increased ( P < 0.0001) (Figs. 3 h).
Notably, TG7 and TG1 exhibit a highly significant increase in gene expression compared to normal human testes ( n = 3, **** p < 0.0001).
The test for subgroup differences was highly significant ( P < .0001), confirming that the type of control treatment substantially influenced the magnitude of mPFS benefit associated with osimertinib.
Payment Type (Per Transaction) In a sensitivity analysis classifying each payment into Grant, Hospitality, and Other categories, the Specialty × Payment Class interaction remained highly significant (F-statistic-ANOVA = 10.43, p < 0.0001).
Notably, cadaverine, N-acetylcadaverine, choline, tryptophan, and glycine exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).
However, there was a highly significant difference in ages, with 70.7% of cases aged 0–6 months old, 29.3% aged 7–12 months and none aged more than 12 months ( P < 0.0001).
Considering, within-group comparisons, it was observed all experimental groups showed a highly significant difference across the specified time intervals i.e. 6,12 and 24th week ( p = 0.0001) indicating effective intervention.
2 A; P < 0.01), and this difference in response between lean and obese subjects was highly significant (Fig. 2 A; interaction P < 0.0001).
65,66 Statistical analysis confirmed these reductions were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared with the EAC control.
Intragroup reductions from baseline remained highly significant at all time points in both groups (p = 0.0001).