Regarding schistosomiasis, cysteine peptidases, such as papain, Schistosoma mansoni cathepsin B1 (SmCB1) and cathepsin L3 (SmCL3) and Fasciola hepatica cathepsin L1 (FhCL1) do not induce allergic reactions in mice or hamsters and were shown instead to elicit reproducible and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) reduction of 50–65% in challenge S. mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium infection, via generation of polarized (papain, SmCL3, FhCL)- or predominant (SmCB1) type 2 responses involving release of TSLP, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and generation of IgG1 antibodies [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] .
Excerpts
They observed highly significant association of seven COMT marker haplotypes with schizophrenia (CLUMP T4 P -value = 0.0001).
Temperature (T) and aging time (D) showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001), while humidity (H) also demonstrated a significant influence, with all three main factors falling below the 0.05 threshold.
A consistent decline in the number of AK lesions from day 3 to day 29 was observed for all three active treatments, and the difference between active treatments and vehicle was highly significant at day 57 ( p <0.0001) [ Table 1 ].[ 11 ] The severity of local skin reactions in the active treatment groups followed a dose-dependent pattern, peaked between days 3 and 8 then largely resolved by day 15.
rigaudi and marginally significant for E. artemiae ( t = −6.7 and −2.2, P < 0.0001 and P = 0.05, respectively).
Comparison of survival curve using a log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test showed a highly significant difference between mice treated with control ATCs and mice treated with CD33GO BATs (p < 0.0001), control ATCs vs.
Statistical analysis using an unpaired t test with Welch’s correction showed a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001).
As shown in Fig 2 , plaques formed in the RAP-treated cultures were smaller and less numerous (mean = 199.3, SD = 9.2, n = 54) than those formed in the control wells (mean = 329.1, SD = 6.7, n = 205), with a two-tailed independent t-test revealing this difference to be highly significant (t = 9.290, d.f. = 257, p<0.0001).
The correlation between the mean fixation duration in session 1 and session 2 was highly significant, r = 0.82, p < 0.0001, replicating previous studies ( Guy et al., 2019 ; Henderson & Luke, 2014 ).
The AHI showed the most prominent group difference (Wilcoxon-Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was highly significant with chi 2 = 22, df = 3 p < 0.0001) with severely lower event rates in the LTG (9.45/h) compared to POAG (22.7/h) and controls (21.9/h; p < 0.0001 and 0.02, respectively).
While both monotherapies induced a modest increase in CD69 expression, the combination treatment led to highly significant upregulation compared with the vehicle ( p < 0.0001 for CD4+, p = 0.0005 for CD8+, Dunn’s test).
A highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) was found.
sylvestris was highly significant ( p < 0.0001: ****).
3c ), highly significant effects in paired two-way t tests (weakest effect: p = 0.0001), indicating that our experimental conditions do give rise to the so-called stereo-movement suppression phenomenon.
Indeed, based on this ratio, fim2 expression in HB101 exerted a highly significant positive impact on biofilm formation on both surfaces ( P < 0.0001 in each case).
The difference in the ratio MUM/NSB/NBA between C x C (1.97/1.01/11.89) compared to C x NC (0.34/1.43/14.44) is highly significant ( P < .0001, Chi-Square).
3 , the correlations of BAP1, H3K36me3 and PBRM1 expression patterns were highly significant among each other ( P < .0001).
For all parameters in the Friedrichs criteria in both active and placebo group, the p -value from screening to weeks 1, 2 and 4 was highly significant ( p value ≤ 0001).
Results Analysis of the interventions indicated a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) mean reduction in attendances.
A highly significant association ( p <0.0001) between reduced amounts of vaginal lactobacilli (< 10 4 cfu/swab) and the presence of genital tract pathogens was found in the female study population ( Fig 3A ).
Evaluation of Daratumumab Drug Effect in Immunoglobulin (Ig) G and Non-IgG Myeloma Patients The effect of daratumumab was highly significant in the overall population of patients receiving 16 mg/kg ( p < 0.0001), as well as in patients with IgG ( p < 0.0001) and non-IgG MM ( p = 0.004) [Table 2 ].
G2 also showed improvement, from 1.54 ± 0.61 at T0 (range 1–3) to 0.97 ± 0.62 at T1 (range 0–3), with a highly significant change (p < 0.0001).
In the comparison between SAMS patients and the control group, we observed a significant difference ( P < 0.05) in BUN, fasting blood glucose, and triglycerides and a highly significant difference in total cholesterol, creatinine, CPK, CRP, and 25OH-vitamin D serum levels ( P < 0.0001) (Tables 2 and 3 ).
Correlation between LCD and genetic affinity were highly significant for a period of 5950–15,950 BP (r = − 0.909, p < 0.0001).
As expected, we observed a highly significant inverse correlation between CAG repeat numbers and the AAO in a multivariate linear regression analysis ( P < 0.0001), both for the individual sub-cohorts (Supplementary Table S9) and combined cohorts of MJD patients (Fig. 1 e; Table 2 ; Supplementary Table S9).