Excerpts

Both serum and urine I-FABP levels had a highly significant positive correlation with each other ( r = 0.406 P < 0.0001).

The average thickness, for example, shows the expected highly significant difference using our method ( p < 0.0001 ), but not for CCSeg ( p ≈ 0.42 ) using the same statistical model as above.

A similar pattern was observed for albumin levels, with no significant interaction ( p = 0.4109; ηp 2 = 0.030) and no effect of PA ( p = 0.6282; ηp 2 = 0.010), while HBO again demonstrated a highly significant main effect ( p < 0.0001; ηp 2 = 0.704).

When the analysis was performed according to the lesion size, a statistically significant difference was noted in the detection rate of DWI and T 2 -TSE for both types of metastatic lesions (lesions with size <10 mm and lesions with size >10 mm), and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for lesions <10 mm in which DWI detected 38 more lesions compared with T 2 -TSE.

Interestingly, cytology parameters also showed highly significant differences between benign lesions and healthy controls (all p < 0.0001).

For highly significant findings, a threshold of p < 0.0001 was used, corresponding to a 99.9% confidence interval.

Its mode of action was clear and highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table S3 ).

However, the results were found to be statistically highly significant when correlation was done between knowledge, attitude, and practices ( p < 0.0001).

Nevertheless, we observed a highly significant difference in the mean daily number of ESBs present in the UVDs ( P < 0.0001), determined by data from the time points sampled over the full day—insects kept under the shorter photoperiod had significantly more ESBs in their vasa deferentia ( Fig. 3F ).

ANOVA confirmed the model's predictive accuracy ( Table 4 ): the regression was highly significant ( F = 17.2075, p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.9907), and the adjusted R 2 (0.9786) and predicted R 2 (0.9274) agreed to within an acceptable margin (Δ R 2 < 0.2).

However, the separation of the survival curves was highly significant (log-rank P < 0.0001), confirming the preventive effect of the intervention over time.

The pairwise comparisons between concentrations in front of and behind the filter unit revealed highly significant differences for all microbiological parameters ( p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).

However, the test for residual heterogeneity remained highly significant (QE(df = 20) = 1017.9061, p < 0.0001), confirming substantial variability among studies.

The study successfully captured significant longitudinal trends in both humoral and cellular immunity, including a highly significant decline in anti-spike IgG antibodies ( P <0.0001) and group-wise differences in IFN-γ levels ( P =0.0299), indicating the robustness of the cohort size and design.

The model was highly significant ( F = 153.81, p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack-of-fit ( p = 0.7526), indicating adequate fit.

One-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant effect of incubation time on biofilm formation ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.966).

For sub-lineage K-IIc, both neutrality tests were strongly negative and highly significant (Tajima’s D = −0.0850, p < 0.0001; Fu’s Fs = −27.7220, p < 0.0001), jointly pointing to a pronounced excess of rare haplotypes consistent with a recent and rapid population expansion.

The repeated‐measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference among total, dominant, and nondominant mBF (F(2,334) = 136.30, p < 0.0001).

As shown in Figure 2 A and summarized in Table S1 , the type of LAB fermentation had an extremely significant and substantial impact on the soluble sugar content of the QJ beverage ( p < 0.0001), decreasing from 28.75 ± 0.12 to 26.11 ± 0.80, 21.61 ± 1.25, and 22.13 ± 1.32 mg/mL by the fermentation using the Lf14, Lr18 and Lp808 strains, respectively.

Regarding the increase in bitterness and specially astringency observed during wine oxidation are consistent with the highly significant increase in tannin activity (F = 37.53; p < 0.0001) from 2798 ± 577 J mol −1 to 4353 ± 663 J mol −1 .

The effect of Cu on C and N uptake is highly significant with time (P < 0.0001 df = 3) and concentration (P < 0.0001 df = 2) Concentration effects of Pb were non-significant for pC (P = 0.6012 df = 3) or pN (P = 0.3579 df = 3).

Effects of treatments on yield and yield components Nutrient treatments had a very highly significant effect on wheat grain yield and thousand-seed weight (p < 0.0001).

According to the model fit statistics, the quadratic model is suggested to be highly significant among linear, 2-factor interactions (2FI), and quadratic models for turbidity ( p = 0.0001), COD ( p = 0.0004) removal, and residual Al ( p = 0.0274) implying high correlation coefficient (R 2 ) values, 0.9831, 0.9838, and 0.9775, respectively.

Notwithstanding the smaller sample size at FP + 14, the platelet increase observed at FP + 14 was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Under Eligibility Criteria, inclusion criteria were reported in 80% of public summaries and 100% of GAI summaries ( p = 0.11), whereas exclusion criteria were completely absent in the public summaries (0%) but present in all GAI-generated ones (100%), representing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).