Both TE and the Modified ICPBL test showed highly significant discrepancies in the DA group compared to the control group ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The ANOVA result remained highly significant ( p < 0.001) when considering the valence dimension as well.
Group differences in comprehensive self-efficacy score were also highly significant, Welch’s F (2, 1818.12) = 1009.66, p < 0.001.
Highly significant ( p <0.001) correlations among ME, AA and DP malting traits were observed.
The statistical analysis identified a significant difference of microleakage among the groups, with Group II as having significantly lower leakage in comparison to Group I (p = 0.04) and Group III had the best outcome with highly significant difference from Group I (p = 0.001).
For each indicator of both species, the results of this test were highly significant ( p < 0.001 ), denoting that the indicator distributions are not similar among all resolutions.The effect size, or the agreement between values of indicators on each mesh, was computed with the Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W).
We observed a highly significant difference between the distributions of body color phenotypes among caterpillars raised on intact willow vs. intact birch ( Table 1, G = 745, P<0.001 ).
Association between E-cadherin expression and clinicopathologic indices A highly significant association was observed between E-cadherin expression and LN status in HNSCC ( P <0.001).
The interaction of MC and switching was clearly significant, F (1, 39) = 25.018, p < .001, η 2 p = .391, confirming larger error switch costs in the modality-incompatible than in the modality-compatible condition (6.5% vs. 3.5%).
A proposed classification by ABC + Lactate score was highly significant ( p = 0.001), with those in the highest class having ICU mortality of 75% and hospital and 12-month mortality of 93%.
The three independent variables generated a highly significant model ( p < 0.001) with a determination coefficient of 0.92 (adjusted R 2 ; root mean squared error (RMSE) = 1.7 K) based on ca. 50 % randomly chosen observations (calibration dataset).
A repeated‐measures ANOVA on mean amplitudes from 20 to 80 ms showed a highly significant Laterality effect, F (1, 30) = 119.34, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.80, an effect of Block, F (2, 60) = 4.35, p = .017, η p 2 = 0.13, and their interaction, F (2, 60) = 6.80, p = .002, η p 2 = 0.18.
For both cell lines the highly significant (p<0.001) suppression of BRG1 expression was determined by qRT-PCR ( Fig 3A ).
These differences were highly significant ( P <0.001).
Highly significant associations were observed in the prevalence of this gene in isolates from GC patients as compared with isolates from PUD and NUD (P-value <0.001) ( Table 3 ).
The effect of EMS on the reproductive output of females was estimated using a non-linear model and was highly significant ( p < 0.001 for both numbers of eggs and adults per female).
The coefficient for Aging_Rate ( β3 ) is positive and highly significant (1.094, p = 0.001), confirming Hypothesis 3 ( β3 > 0).
Regarding the association between intentions towards COVID 19 vaccination and attitudes towards vaccines, vaccine hesitancy had highly significant associations with intermediate mistrust level of vaccine benefit (p < .001), high worries about unforeseen effects (p < .001), intermediate concerns about commercial profiteering (p < .001), and intermediate preference of natural immunity (p < .001) ( Table 5 ).
The correlation in V1 was highly significant, both when using the bootstrap approach ( p < 0.001), and when using a paired t -test [ t (6) = 6.30, p = 0.0004].
The apoptosis rate in the serum-free group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.001).
As expected, there was a highly significant main effect of sampling time (F = 26.62, df = (1,54), p < 0.001), indicating that cortisol means varied across the day.
Venous blood flow Peak venous velocity with NMES showed a highly significant ( P < .001) increase over baseline, both in the seated position and in the recumbent position (Figure 5 ).
As shown in Table 1 , there are highly significant differences in terms of the number of cases with high IGFIR expression between the colorectal cancer and the normal group ( P < 0.001) or between the cancer and the adenoma group ( P < 0.001).
ROC curve had a highly significant area under curve (AUC) (0.964, P<0.001).
The heatmap reveals that the majority of pairwise feature comparisons yielded highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), emphasizing that each feature combination introduces distinctive acoustic information rather than redundant patterns.