In the “Out-of-sample validation” section, the text “we obtained digitised maps of AADT” has been amended to “we obtained digitised maps of AADT (work day averages)”; the text “27 and 87 empirical AADT values” has been amended to “28 and 87 empirical AADT values”; the text “highly significant ( p < 0.001) and positive (0.60 and 0.70, respectively)” has been amended to “highly significant ( p < 0.005) and positive (0.55 and 0.70, respectively)”; the text “The percentage of observations that fell within the 90% prediction interval was 85.2%” has been amended to “The percentage of observations that fell within the 90% prediction interval was 89.3%”; and the text “These percentage dropped to 63.3% and 77.4%” has been amended to “These percentage dropped to 63.6% and 77.4%”.
Excerpts
Cohoused control rats showed a statistically significant difference ( P < 0.01, t = 3.934), and cohoused PS rats presented a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001, t = 4.839).
Age was a highly significant non-linear coefficient for GEDV with large inter-individual variance (p < 0.001).
Moreover, the Composite × Procedure interaction was highly significant (Wald χ2 = 41.428; df = 2; p < 0.001), demonstrating that the extent of color change induced by the procedures differed according to material type rather than affecting all composites uniformly.
However, we noted an overall trend for increased publication for allopathic senior authors (p=0.001), allopathic first authors with a dual degree (p=0.003) and allopathic senior authors with a dual degree (p=0.005).
Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 514.4, df = 210, p < .001), indicating some relationships existed between variables, which makes the correlation matrix suitable for factor analysis.
Wilcoxon rank-sum tests comparing SSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the short sleep and combined long/intermediate sleep categories, and LSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the long sleep and combined short/intermediate sleep categories, revealed highly significant differences (P<0.001), confirming that SSPGI, LSPGI, and SDPGI effectively distinguish between the respective sleep duration categories.
Although the difference in apparent H + affinity between the two concatamers was highly significant (p < 0.001), it was rather slight (0.3 pH units), suggesting that the contribution of individual subunits to apparent H + affinity is not simply additive but that apparent H + affinity is rather determined by the complex interaction of all three subunits.
Taking the two monkeys together, saccades to the remembered location began approximately 36 ms later than those to the attended location, a difference that was highly significant (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.001).
Highly significant differences in the allelic distributions ( P < 0.001) were found between all the geographic groups for all markers except for the CH-Vf1 locus when comparing Southern and Western germplasm (data not shown).
The level of significance of “ p ” value at a 95% confidence interval was calibrated as—nonsignificant— p > 0.05; significant—0.01, p < 0.05; and highly significant— p < 0.001.
In addition, nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed across multiple feature representations, including raw conductance, temperature, proportional adjustment, and adaptive scaling, consistently yielding highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ).
Gene set tests were highly significant for both Schmid versus wildtype and Cog versus wildtype ( p ≤0.001 in each case).
The Bartlett’s test of Sphericity is highly significant at p < 0.001 which shows that the correlation matrix has significant correlations among at least some of the variables.
The Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant (p < 0.001), which confirmed the prerequisite for factor analysis.
[ Table 3 ] Change in serum potassium There was significant decrease in serum potassium with all three types of insulin preparations but it was highly significant ( P < 0.001) with RHI.
11 (23.4%), showed a highly significant difference (p <0.001); among these IL-9, IL-15, IFN-γ, IP-10, TNF-α, IL-1α and MCP-3 underwent a down-regulation, while IL-17 and FGF-basic, G-CSF, GM-CSF an up-regulation.
Statistically, this comparison was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The accuracies of radiologists’ independent diagnoses were 58.4%, 59.7%, and 55.3%, respectively, all of which showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
The standard drug prednisolone produced a highly significant reduction in spleen/body weight compared with acetic acid colitis group [(0.25 ± 0.02) and (0.40 ± 0.01)], ( P < 0.001).
The statistical analysis of mean difference of blue hole diameters from different H 2 O 2 showed that the increase of hole diameters is extremely significant (P<0.001) with the increase of H 2 O 2 from 0 to 20 mM, but not significant (P>0.05) with the increase of H 2 O 2 from 20 mM to 30 mM ( Table S1 ).
There was no statistical difference in their agreement on biostatistics being a difficult subject ( P = 0.1) when comparison was made between different academic positions whereas there was a highly significant difference among the proportion of staff (39.5%) in comparison to PG students (27.1%) regarding the confidence of designing their own research projects ( P < 0.001).
For the entire set of 389 articles, the correlation between the logarithm of the number of edits and the imbalance of an article is r (387) = -.51 and statistically highly significant, p < .001.
Furthermore, when the data from these three areas were combined and compared with the combined data from the three areas within the default network, we confirmed that the Age × Task interaction was significantly larger in the default network than outside it (that is, the three-way interaction among Age, Task, and Brain Area (in or out of default network) was highly significant [ F (1,30) = 18.44, p < 0.001].
Non-parametric tests of SC values reveal highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), with both gesture vs. non-interaction and keyboard vs. non-interaction conditions showing significant contrasts.