The improvement from Phase 1 to Phase 2 was highly significant (32% vs. 100%, p < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test).
Excerpts
5A , the escape latency in either control or tg mice dramatically decreased following training, and a within-group one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in both control [F(5,54) = 24.82, p<0.001] and tg mice [F(5,54) = 18.67, p<0.001], indicating that all these mice were able to learn the task.
These differences were highly significant, χ 2 (2, N = 308) = 32.89, p < 0.001.
The difference in prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae among the study and control groups was highly significant with a P < 0.001 [ Table 1 ].
The difference between the two countries in mean gene number was highly significant ( t test, p = 0.001; Table 2 ).
Further, a highly significant ( p < 0.001) percentage of participants felt that using NPs reduced their COVID-19 symptoms without having any remarkable ( p < 0.001) adverse effects.
Using phylogenetic ridge regression of S 1 against time, we observed a highly significant decreasing trend in S 1 for K = 1 (Fig. 2 a, slope = −149.18, p < 0.001, Table 1 ) and, to a lesser extent, for K = 3 (not shown).
Intergroup comparison for HP VAS score (pre-operative and post-operative) revealed that there was statistically highly significant difference between post-operative pain recorded at 6-, 12-, 18 h, 1st day, 2nd day, 3rd day, 4th day(p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed highly significant differences in OS between the two groups (log-rank test, P<0.001) ( Figure 5 ).
As shown in Supplementary Figure 1 , the correlation was highly significant ( P =0.001, <0.0001, <0.0001, and 0.002 for let-7g, let-7f, miR-26a and miR-107, respectively).
The difference between non-injected and both ATG-MO and Ex6-MO injected fish was considered to be highly significant ( p <0.001) for both coalesced and dispersed melanophore localisations.
The index colonoscopy rate showed a decreasing trend with age ( P < 0.001, CA trend test).
Collaboration demonstrated highly significant and positive associations with its subscales: Cooperation (r = 0.780, p < .001), Partnership (r = 0.710, p < 0.001), and Coordination (r = 0.704, p < 0.001).
Factors Influencing Foraging Behavior Table 3 shows that food presentation type had a highly significant effect on foraging behavior ( p < 0.001) in this study, and weather was also significant ( p < 0.042).
Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05, with highly significant results reported at p < 0.001.
There are highly significant statistical differences between food literacy level and nationality (χ 2 = 13.352; p = 0.001).
A significant trend (χ2 = 38.45; p < 0.001) was observed, demonstrating that knowledge directly translated to better practice, with a 2.2-fold increase in appropriate use between the lowest and highest knowledge tertiles.
The severity of the cervical lesions and p16, Ki67, and p16/Ki67 IS showed an increasing trend (Multinomial Cochran-Armitage trend test, all P < 0.001).
Overall, the effect of the intervention remained highly significant after accounting for clustering by site (χ 2 = 55.16, p < 0.001). 4.
In Mélapleu, schools were cited as the most important source of information (62%), with a statistically highly significant difference to Zouatta II (18%; χ 2 = 13.4, P <0.001).
However, the difference in noise levels between the center of the clinic and the chairside (with either of suction with air rotor handpiece, suction with micro-motor handpiece and suction only) was very highly significant for all the maximum readings ( P = 0.001).
Pairwise comparisons between groups with differing glycemic control using Dunn’s test revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences for all categories save between the diabetic and poorly-controlled groups, which were not significant.
Spatial Differences Among Plantations A Chi-square test of independence revealed highly significant differences in the proportion of damaged boxes among plantations (χ 2 = 201.3, df = 4, p < 0.001).
A highly significant association was found between healthcare worker categories and injury mechanism (p < 0.001), identifying two distinct socio-technical failure modes: Clinical Process Failures: Clinical staff (Physicians: OR=5.13; Nurses: OR=2.57) are primarily injured as “original users” during active clinical Tasks (e.g., suturing, injections).
Progressing from No-DR to S-NPDR, there was a significant trend of worsening visual acuity (logMAR BCVA P < 0.001) and thinning of the choroid (SFCT P < 0.001).