“a trend level of significance”

At a trend level of significance, disengagers were prescribed a lower dose of antipsychotic medication, had higher BPRS total scores, performed more poorly on MCCB tests of attention and vigilance and were more likely to smoke cigarettes ( table 1 ).

However, none of the interactions reached even a trend level of significance.

Baseline attention bias predicted state anxiety change at a trend level of significance with greater baseline threat bias predicting greater elevations in state anxiety following stress induction.

Analyses of the power data only showed a trend level of significance toward higher α- than β-power regardless of playing condition or season.

(2013) , although it was only observed in the high-frequency list and at a trend level of significance.

Abnormalities at the implementation stage were at a trend level of significance predicting risk for conversion to a psychotic disorder on the NAPLS risk calculator.

In contrast, differences between MDD and HC groups only reached a trend level of significance ( p tfce-FWE = 0.095).

Volumetric abnormalities in ADHD subjects were found only at a trend level of significance, including reduced gray matter (GM) in the right angular gyrus, and increased GM in the right supplementary motor area and superior frontal gyrus.

2009 ), longer-term administration may have resulted in significant effect size differences relative to placebo for the below-threshold normalized right VLPFC and cerebellar underactivations, which in the cerebellum reached a trend level of significance.

However, after adjusting for demographic confounders, the association between single or multiple childhood adversities and psychosis remained only at a trend level of significance.

When correcting for level of elevated mood (YMRS scores) at the second to last step, the impact of continued cannabis use was reduced to a trend level of significance (4B).

Notably, the present study also observed an increase of gamma-band power in the audiovisual condition at a trend level of significance.

In fact, performance on other cognitive domains improved less in the DCS group than in the placebo group at a trend level of significance, suggesting that DCS enhancement of learning on a practiced task may come at the cost of less improvement in unpracticed cognitive tasks, consistent with use-dependent plasticity.

In our case, several FNC pairs showed a trend level of significance, but did not quite reach a corrected level of significance for the static FNC analysis.

HDAC2 (p=0.012), MTF2 (p=0.001), SIRT1 (p=0.003), and SUZ12 (p=0.045) were significantly higher in PMDD, and RBBP7 (p=0.076) was higher at a trend level of significance in PMDD.

Another study found that birthing women applying mindfulness training opted for analgesic drugs at a lower frequency than women who did not do the training, though this difference only reached a trend level of significance (Duncan et al., 2017 ).

A value of .05< = p >.0125 was considered to indicate a trend level of significance.

Urban living showed a trend level of significance.

Second, a trend level of significance of group differences in years of education is observed in the present study.

A meta-analysis of CHR studies found a similar gender effect, however only at a trend level of significance ( Fusar-Poli et al., 2012a ).

Discussion As predicted and in line with previous research [ 3 , 4 , 6 – 9 , 41 ], ADHD participants differed from healthy adults on a number of indicators of driving performance, specifically, average speed, proportion of the distance travelled over the speed limit, vehicle control (taking hands off the wheel, putting the car in the wrong gear), changing lanes/overtaking safely on the motorway (at a trend level of significance), reactions to sudden events and the expression of frustration or anger with other road users.

The level of significance was defined as a p-value less than 0.05, and a p-value between 0.05 and 0.10 was considered a trend level of significance.

The groups differed significantly in length of index admission (χ 2 = 6.05, P = .049), and pairwise comparisons showed that the low IQ and DIQ groups did not differ (χ 2 = 0.803, P = .370), but the patients in the preserved IQ group had shorter admissions compared with the low IQ group (χ 2 = 5.43, P = .020) and DIQ group (χ 2 = 3.27, P = .071) at a trend level of significance.

When the p value is > .05 and < 0.10, it may be acceptable to report a difference ‘with a trend level of significance’. 3.

Third, the sample sizes of both treatment groups were relatively small, which may have yielded some findings which only reached a trend level of significance.