“almost significant”

4 ): (i) The regression model using IR Index as DV and ROIs’ θ as predictors was almost significant (R2= 0.326, F (4,23) = 2.300, p =.096).

Interestingly, there was a trend that individuals who are employed had IBS more than the unemployed participants, with an almost significant difference (p value = 0.096).

Besides, there was an almost significant improvement in the domains body image scale ( p = 0.096), and FROM-16 emotional domain ( p = 0.075) (Table 5 ).

In this model, presence of a warm temperate climate on the national territory and DTP vaccination coverage were also found as almost significant (p<0.1).

Indoor air bacterial communities reveal almost significant differences compared to those of floor dust (0.05< p <0.1).

, 2017) (likelihood ratio test, P < 0.05), while in NSCLC the association was almost significant ( P < 0.1).

The sFLT-1 isolated value showed an almost significant increase in the diagnosis week for FGR only (PCC −0.38; p < 0.10).

the least significant variable was dropped, one at a time, until only statistically significant or almost significant effects ( P <0·10) were left.

When leaving out coresident children (Model 2), the effect becomes smaller (11%), although it is still negative and almost significant ( p < .10).

Other variables that were almost significant ( p < 0.1), namely, soil pH, total nitrogen content, and mean annual temperature, explained 5.8% of the RBAI variability.

Of the highest ranked loci in the Ewens-Watterson test, two were almost significant ( COR008 and AHT006 , P <0.1), two were significant ( NVHEQ079 and TKY316 , P <0.05) and one was highly significant ( TKY222 , P <0.01) for the F ST test.

This improvement was almost significant for the trained condition (Interaction F (1,42) = 2.8, p = 0.1, partial η 2 = 0.06).

In Model 3, the interaction coefficient between gender and autonomy ( B = 0.258, SE = 0.159, W = 1.62), and the likelihood ratio test with Model 1 (LRT = 2.7 (1)) were almost significant, with p < 0.10.

VF measures, reflux, and venous diameter No significant statistical differences were found in the VF rate in the deep veins (CFV, FV and popliteal veins [PVs]), except in the left femoral vein (LFV) where almost significant differences were observed ( P < .10).

Multivariate logistic regression model The significant variables except FFP transfusion and some almost significant variables (p < 0.1) from the univariate analysis (peripheral arterial disease, preoperative hemoglobin level, duration of operation, duration of bypass, postoperative intraaortic balloon counterpulsation) were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

(2) Almost significant differences were observed when comparing the expression of Le a , and blood group A antigens in squamous epithelium and invasive carcinomas (p < 0.1).

The relationship between SOFA score and ECLT remained significant in the non-septic patients (r = 0.45, p = 0.01) and was almost significant in the septic patients (r = 0.39, p = 0.11).

A correlation between PRx and both CBFica was almost significant (p = 0.112 and p = 0.137).

However, we did find an almost significant difference for TrpN, with an increase in children with moderate impairment (389.13 vs. 528.14; p = 0.13).

This finding was almost significant (p = 0.15).

Post hoc general linear models controlling for sleep onset and maintenance problems at t1 found no effect of presence of recurring memories ( F (1, 32) = 0.08, p =0.78) on later sleep onset and maintenance problems at t2, but an almost significant influence of presence of hypervigilance ( F (1, 32) = 4.05, p =0.53).

We observed an increase of patients going back home with a trend test almost significant ( p = 0.57) and a chi-squared test that is statistically significant between 2010 and 2012 ( p = 0.002).

21 Outcome data Two large randomized trials (DEFINE-FLAIR, n = 2492; iFR-SWEDEHEART, n = 2037) showed the noninferiority of an iFR vs an FFR-guided PCI strategy during follow-up at 1 year and 5 years, although iFR showed lower revascularization rates with almost significant P values. 31 , 32 The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 18.6% (iFR) vs 16.8% (FFR) ( P = .63) after 5 years in deferred patients who presented with stable angina (n = 611) or nonculprit lesions of ACS (unstable angina and NSTEMI, n = 297).

The range of RGS in DNA-diploids was relatively narrow (Table 1 ), with an almost significant increase towards the east (latitude: r s = −0.154, P = 0.804; longitude: r s = 0.872, P = 0.054; Fig. 2 F, Fig.

One study found a statistically almost significant increase in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in the rosiglitazone group when compared to placebo [ 60 ], while there were no significant changes in VAT between the glitazone and placebo arms in the other studies.