Pooled OR of normal ALT at follow-up remained >1 after each study was removed in turn, despite after the removals of 2 individual studies, [ 16 , 17 ] the OR became borderline significant, indicating no obvious influence of any individual study on the pooled estimate. 3.5.
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There was a trend toward the better effect of RCS, with healing time borderline significant.
Additionally, the borderline significant findings favoring CATCH-IT with the completion of 2 modules (eTable 3 in Supplement 2 ) suggest that there may also be a threshold effect whereby sufficient numbers of modules may need to be completed for CATCH-IT to be more efficacious than HE.
The associations of questionnaire-assessed PA with age (β = –13 min/week, p = 0.055) and undernutrition (β = –211 min/week, p = 0.061) became borderline significant in the multivariate model correcting for other covariates.
Age group between 75 and 79 and African American race were poor and borderline significant risk factors.
We noticed significant or borderline significant increases in the total density of spines in all test groups, except for the high 5-FTFH group.
However, this interpretation remains provisional because the main effect was null and the interaction evidence in the primary model was only borderline significant. 4.2.
Our pooled estimate for nervous system tumors was borderline significant (95% CI: 1.02–1.17).
In summary, one high powered study did not find differential subscale effects; another higher-powered study found only borderline significant effects in the same direction as the present study. 4.2.
This result was mainly associated with patients diagnosed with CD, who were significantly around 5% to 50% more likely to report better QOL if they practiced SMN, whereas the outcome for patients with UC was only borderline significant ( Fig 1C ; S1 Text , section 2.2).
For exposure parameters with significant or borderline significant effects on average gene methylation and CpG methylation, we presented the results in Table 1 .
The presence of BCoV genetic material was detected more frequently in younger calves, males and animals with clinical signs of respiratory disease; however, the associations were only borderline significant ( Table 2 ).
While these findings could not be explained by additional behavioral or gaze cues, they did show only a borderline significant effect and only for initial trials.
This borderline significant improvement in men between 12 and 24 months was mainly driven by sex domain and hobbyism‐punding domain.
Using the brain amyloid information only, sample size estimates were significantly smaller in amyloid+ EMCI and LMCI participants, and borderline significant in AD patients, compared with amyloid− patients ( Table 6 and Fig. 6B ).
The E status in our study was related in a borderline significant way to hearing outcome, with a better pneumatization/ventilation status associated to a lower postoperative ABG.
Among the AUCs, only NEWS was statistically significant regardless the aetiology; other tools resulted borderline significant for abdominal, miscellaneous and indeterminate infections.
Higher PM 2.5 air pollution exposures were associated with higher adduct levels, but the association was only borderline significant ( Table 4 ).
In our study, asthmatic OCS ever-users with long OCS duration (1–119 days) (n=204/439) had a borderline significant association with low handgrip strength, however, this effect did not further increase in the group with a OCS duration of 120 days and above (n=82/439).
In contrast, physical activity interventions demonstrated a small and borderline significant effect (SMD = −0.20; 95% CI: −0.39, 0.00; I 2 = 78.46%).
Borderline significant difference was shown in the average sun exposure in the past week, but serum total 25(OH)D level was not significantly associated with the average sun exposure time in multivariate analysis adjusted by age and sex (data not shown). 3.3 Comparison of the anthropometrical data and body composition ac
One notable issue of this study is the borderline significant difference in the history of psychological treatment between groups.
They also found a significant rise in creatinine in the intervention group which was borderline significant in the between-groups difference.
If there was no significance at the 0.05 level, the significance level of 0.1 was determined as borderline significant difference considering the small size of the reoperation group.
They showed a borderline significant decline (15%, 4/5 women) in SC number within one year, and the percentage of PAX7+ cells correlated positively with individual serum 17 β -estradiol levels.