Subsequently, at post-intervention (TF3) and the fifth cycle (FF1), it decreased to 67.70 ± 22.37 and 70.51 ± 33.23, respectively, demonstrating a statistically extremely significant reduction from the baseline ( p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
Expression was extremely significant in the distal colon of the double infection group ( p < 0.0001).
Because of the drug’s high efficacy, results of all analyses are extremely significant ( p -value < 0.0001).
In particular, compared with the level observed at 0 d (CK), the expression of pyrB (5-fold), flmH (8-fold), pilR (4-fold) and bopD (5-fold) reached extremely significant levels at 15 days (t=20.51, df=4, p <0.0001), 10 days (t=14.28, df=4, p <0.0001), 5 days (t=26.79, df=4, p <0.0001) and 10 days (t=32.57, df=4, p <0.0001), respectively ( Figure 6C ).
Here, all of this is supported by an extremely significant McNemar’s test (χ 2 = 47.3, p < 0.0001).
In sharp contrast, the Post-booster (7 days) group exhibited a dramatic elevation in Tfh cell percentage relative to the other three groups, with the difference reaching extremely significant statistical levels ( P < 0.0001, Fig. 6 C).
Statistically, there was an extremely significant increase ( p = 0.0001) in lesion scores in the cecal tissue of the CP group compared to the CN group.
P values are calculated using unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction, and the levels of statistical significance are assigned as follows: P ≥ 0.05, not significant (n.s.); 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05, significant (*); 0.001≤ P < 0.01, very significant (**); P 0.0001 ≤ P < 0.001, extremely significant (***); P < 0.0001, extremely significant (****).
A two-way ANOVA analysis shows that the variable % of AcEt/TFA is extremely significant, affecting 95.13% of total result variance, with a p -value < 0.0001.
Comparison of the Puncture Depth Between the Ipsilateral Ventricle and the Contralateral Ventricle The difference in the puncture depth between the ipsilateral ventricle and the contralateral ventricle was extremely significant ( P < .0001); the depth of puncture to the ipsilateral ventricle in 373 patients was less than 60 mm, and the depth of puncture to the contralateral ventricle in 37 patients ranged from 52 to 65 mm (Figure 4 D).
137 A comparison of the in vitro release profiles of transferosome gels prepared using Polyoxyl 40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil and Span 60 surfactants revealed an extremely significant variation (p < 0.0001) in the curcumin release percentage after 6 and 48 h ( Figure 8B ).
The pretest vs post test values of the WOMAC scale for patients with knee OA within both groups were found to be extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).
It could be seen from the results that the F value of the regression model was 58.31, the significance test was extremely significant ( P < .0001), and the misfitting item was not significant ( P = .7510 > .05), indicating that the model was reliable.
11 H ), it had an extremely significant effect on the level of H3K27 me3 detected at 25 kDa (Fig. 11 I , P = 0.0002, −21%).
It was found that the response surface regression model is extremely significant ( p -value <0.0003).
For the right adrenal gland, the difference between the study group (1.85 ± 0.05 g/m 2 ) and the control group (1.42 ± 0.24 g/m 2 ) was extremely significant (t-test, p = 0.0003, t = 3.75, df = 118).
Comparison of slopes was performed via a two-tailed t test, which determined the difference generated was extremely significant ( p = 0.0004).
Level of significance adopted for all tests was p < 0.05 (significant p < 0.05, very significant p < 0.03, extremely significant p < 0.001). 3.
KIAA1549::BRAF fusion demonstrated an extremely significant association ( P < 0.001) with biphasic type where it was present in 81% of cases ( Fig. 2 ).
An extremely significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001) was obtained by comparing the length of pars plana between control eyes and myopic eyes.
Five compounds showed an extremely significant correlation ( P ≤ 0.001) with the turquoise module, four with the brown module, and four with the yellow module (Fig. 3 C).
Chi-square test demonstrated an extremely significant difference in mortality between the infected group and control groups ( x 2 = 46.67, p < 0.001).
The dyed fabrics with different (SDs) synthesized dyes exhibited an extremely significant differences in K/S values compared to the undyed fabric (p > 0.001).
Statistical analysis using Tukey’s test demonstrated that extremely significant growth inhibition occurred when Tb(III) concentrations exceeded 1.5 mM ( p < 0.001), showing a clear dose-dependent pattern.
The strength of statistical significance was defined using the following thresholding system: ns (Not significant): p ≥ 0.05, * (Significant): 0.01< p < 0.05, ** (Very significant) 0.001< p < 0.01, *** (Extremely significant) 0.0001< p < 0.001, **** (extremely significant) p < 0.0001.