“extremely significant”

The C item was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the quadratic item (A 2 , B 2 , C 2 , D 2 ) showed a significant level ( p < 0.01).

Data are presented as the mean ± SE of three replicates, with differences considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

The results showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in the total egg weight at 300 d, and average egg weight between the HEW and LEW groups. 733, 591, 82, and 74 differentially expressed genes ( DEGs ) were identified in the liver, magnum, F1, and F5 (hierarchical follicles) follicle membrane, respectively.

Significance levels were indicated as follows: ns, not significant ( p ≥ 0.05); *, statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05); **, statistically extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).

The differences between control and samples values were considered significant at p < 0.05, highly significant at p < 0.01 and extremely significant at p < 0.001. 3.

The results were considered to be statistically significant at p < 0.05 or extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Accurate root cutting rate The results of the variance analysis for the accurate root cutting rate are shown in Table 5 , and the experimental model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

We found that the expression of key molecules in the TLR signaling pathway was significantly up-regulated after the cell transfection with plasmids, with TLR3 molecules showing an extremely significant up-regulation ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 A).

Effects of SEA on Serum ALT Levels in Rabbits As shown in Table 2 , the ALT levels in group TEA-HF at 3 h after electroacupuncture were extremely significant difference compared with control group ( p < 0.01 ), but no significant difference was noted among the other groups. 3.4.

From the regression coefficients and p ‐value, the order of influence of various factors on the embedding efficiency of functional oil microcapsules was as follows: proportion of HACS ( X 2 ) > functional oil concentration ( X 1 ) > proportion of monoglyceride in emulsifier ( X 3 ), and the impact of various factors on the embedding efficiency is extremely significant ( p < .01) (Table 3 ), and the MEE response surface graphs are shown in Figure 1 .

“**” indicate an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01 by the Student’s t-test), “*” indicate a significant difference ( P < 0.05 by the Student’s t-test).

P <0.001 was considered as extremely significant difference, P <0.01 as significant difference, and P <0.05 as statistical difference.

Permanova analysis of clone groups (including clone 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) based on SNP distance showed that there were extremely significant differences among different clone groups (P < 0.01), which indicated that the classification is correct.

*** p < 0.001 (extremely significant), ** p < 0.01 (very significant), * p < 0.05 (significant).

Ultimately, a sequence depth for the parents of greater than 10-fold was achieved, with over 70% integrity of SLAF tags and exclusion from the final map of markers showing extremely significant (p < 0.01) segregation distortion.

Figure 5 encapsulated the three groups of KEGG pathways that we were more concerned about, which have extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) in abundance at various time points.

Compared with the controls, the fish in Ll:pSLC-G group had a significantly lower viral load on the 1st day post-challenge ( p < 0.05), and extremely significant difference was detected on the 3rd day ( p < 0.01).

There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the granule size distribution of the three corn flours ( Table 1 ).

Changes in TPC and TFC of the extracts were influenced by the combined effects of dietary supplements and the phases of in vitro digestion, and the effects were considered extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

The ANOVA test found an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) in soil iron under different land uses in A1 ( p < 0.01).

Statistical results were considered extremely significant at p < 0.01 and significant at p < 0.05.

The paired t-test results showed that the subjective fatigue evaluation after the test was significantly higher than that before the test, and there were extremely significant differences in the subjective fatigue scores of the subjects in terms of eye symptoms, headache symptoms, and body pain ( p < 0.01), as shown in Table 1 .

The activity of LAM in the recombinant yeast expression supernatant was compared before and after the SW reaction, which indicated that the enzyme activity of the wild-type chLAM was reduced by 47.6 times after reaction with SW, the difference was extremely significant ( P <0.01), while there was no significant difference in the experimental group chLAM M ( P >0.05) ( Fig. 3B ).

Results Initially, the paraffin sections showed extremely significant differences in the diameter, number, area and density of skeletal muscle fibers of the fetus, child, adult rabbit hind legs ( P < 0.01).

* represented significant difference ( p < 0.05); ** represented extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01); # represented significant difference ( p < 0.05); and ## represented extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01). 3.