“extremely significant”

Compared with the controls, the fish in Ll:pSLC-G group had a significantly lower viral load on the 1st day post-challenge ( p < 0.05), and extremely significant difference was detected on the 3rd day ( p < 0.01).

The ANOVA test found an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) in soil iron under different land uses in A1 ( p < 0.01).

The paired t-test results showed that the subjective fatigue evaluation after the test was significantly higher than that before the test, and there were extremely significant differences in the subjective fatigue scores of the subjects in terms of eye symptoms, headache symptoms, and body pain ( p < 0.01), as shown in Table 1 .

P <0.001 was considered as extremely significant difference, P <0.01 as significant difference, and P <0.05 as statistical difference.

Compared with GFs from 3-yr-olds, the crude polysaccharide content increased significantly at the 4-yr-old ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant at the 5-yr-old ( p < 0.01).

The results show that the treadmill, rotarod, and swimming time in PE, GA, and EA groups is significantly prolonged, which has extremely significant differences compared to the model group (p < 0.01).

Differences were considered extremely significant at P <0.01 and significant at P <0.05.

Results Initially, the paraffin sections showed extremely significant differences in the diameter, number, area and density of skeletal muscle fibers of the fetus, child, adult rabbit hind legs ( P < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 level and extremely significant at p < 0.01 level. 3.

Result analysis and discussion Grafting success rate The results of the variance analysis for the grafting success rate are shown in Table 5 , and the experimental model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 (labeled as “ * ” and extremely significant at P < 0.01 (labeled as “ ** ”).

The results showed that the level of serum D-dimer in patients with intracranial aneurysms was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01, Figure 1(a) ).

Compared to group D, the level of BG in group H decreased regularly from (25.38 ± 2.21) mmol/L to (18.01 ± 2.53) mmol/L during five weeks, which showed extremely significant hypoglycaemic effects ( p < 0.01) at the 3rd week.

Among the three groups, the M-G scored the highest, the CC-G scored the lowest, and the difference in most items was extremely significant ( p < 0.01) except IS, Hos, and PI ( p < 0.05).

In particular, the AGR showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) at almost every growth stage (Fig. 1 E).

The adaptability of the model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the misfit term is not significant ( p = 0.0534), indicating that the model can well describe the nonlinear relationship between the influencing factors and the response value [ 47 ].

Differences were considered statistically significant at a value of p < 0.05 and extremely significant at a value of p < 0.01 or p < 0.001.

An extremely significant decrease in Aj5-HT4R expression ( p < 0.01), however, was observed in respiratory tree tissue ( Fig. 7A ).

As shown in Table 2 , correlation analysis showed that the surface hydrophobicity was negatively related to EAI and ESI and that this appeared to be extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01).

Meanwhile, extremely significant differences were noted for lipase and amylase activities ( P < 0.01). 3.2.

Compared with group CK, there were significant differences in group RIP ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant differences in group B ( P < 0.01).

Statistical analysis showed extremely significant difference ( p < .01) in lactose content between mare milk and Chigee.

The significant difference was considered at p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference was considered at p < 0.01.

We noted a positive correlation between Mg and K in the five growth stages of CV duck, which showed an extremely significant difference between 0 and 21 days old ( p < 0.01), as well as a significant difference between 35 and 63 days old ( p < 0.05).

For the index of leakage rate, the horizontal transplanting operation speed and the length of feeding have a significant effect ( P < 0.05); Inclined transplanting operation speed have a significant influence (0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05) and the length of feeding have extremely significant influence ( P < 0.01).