“extremely significant”

Using the stem as a control, expression was barely detected in the root, while it was about 26 times higher in the fruit, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01). 3.

‘*’ indicates the relationship between the characteristics reached a significant level ( P < 0.05) and ‘**’ indicates the relationship between the characteristics reached an extremely significant level ( P < 0.01).

Comparing the PDLSC-EV and Cur-PDLSC-EV groups, there were extremely significant differences in COL1 and ALP gene expression ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3D ). 3.5 Effect of Cur-PDLSC-EV on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway According to the Western blotting data, it was shown that Cur-PDLSC-EV upregulated the protein expression of p- GSK3β and β-catenin in PDLSCs.

As shown in Figure 9 b, compared with the control group, YL-1 polysaccharide (>12.5 μg/mL) increased IL-6 expression of RAW264.7 cells, and the difference was extremely significant compared with the control group ( p < 0.01) in the concentration range of (5–200 μg/mL).

The pathological scores showed that the difference between the treated group and the untreated group was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the difference between the ASC-secretome group and the DMEM group was significant ( p < 0.05).

Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01 or p < 0.001 in all analysis in this study. 3.

We examined a total of 60 cows, including subclinical laminitis, chronic laminitis and healthy without any symptoms with 20 animals in each group. Inflammatory mediators Compared with healthy cows, HIS, IL-6, LPS, and TNF-α in subclinical laminitis group significantly increased ( P < 0.05), extremely significant increased HIS, LPS, TNF-α ( P < 0.01) as shown in (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ); compared with healthy cows, COX-2, HIS, IL-6, LPS, and TNF-α in chronic laminitis cows were significantly increased ( P < 0.05), extremely significant increased COX-2, HIS, TNF-α ( P < 0.01) as shown in (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ).

There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among four different adaptive types including aphaenopsian, semi-aphaenopsian, anophthalmic, and surface-dwelling Trechini when their adaptability to a cave environment was used as the basis for grouping.

At the jointing stage, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota, and Myxococcota phyla had extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01), and Actinobacteriota phyla had significant differences ( p < 0.05).

Among the variables, peptide/calcium mass ratio, pH, and temperature all had extremely significant effects on the chelation rate ( p < 0.01), while the effect of chelation time was not significant ( p > 0.05).

5 ), and there was an extremely significant difference in the blood glucose between before and after anaesthesia in the RSG ( P < 0.01, Fig. 5 ).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

rs8193069 had extremely significant effects on #LYMPH and TG ( p < 0.01) and significant effects on MCV, MCHC, #BASO and CK ( p < 0.05).

P -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (# or * P < 0.05) and P -value of less than 0.05 was considered extremely significant (# or ** P < 0.01).

Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference compared with TMV, “ ∗ ” indicate a significant difference ( P < 0.05) and “ ∗∗ ” indicate an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01).

Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA, and it was considered significant when p < 0.05 (*) or considered extremely significant when p < 0.01 (**).

Compared with the sleep deprivation group, the cognitive rate was increased in each dose group of Acanthopanax senticosus, and the difference between the high- and medium-dose groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the difference between the low-dose group was significant ( p < 0.05).

The duration of the RSF (or the ecological restoration duration), vertical soil depth, and horizontal distance from the outcrops had extremely significant effects on the soil particle size distribution parameters ( p < 0.01); however, the interactions among these factors indicated significant differences ( p < 0.05).

Difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, whereas less than 0.01 were considered extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Statistical significance was considered to be significant ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

All data were expressed as mean ± SD and analysed using One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range tests, Dunnett’ s T tests and Student’s T-tests (SPSS Statistics 18.0) to estimate the statistical differences of mean levels among the groups with statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Compared with the control group, the difference was extremely significant in the juglone treatment group ( p < 0.01).

In the haplotype analysis, we found that the haplotypes with the frequency more than 1% in the rs9376267-rs9376268-rs1327475-rs7749390-rs1327474 block were extremely significant associated with the PTB risk ( P <0.01).

Difference between two groups was determined at a significant difference p < 0.05 or at an extremely significant difference p < 0.01.