“extremely significant”

Difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05, whereas less than 0.01 were considered extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

Firstly, follicular cyst follicles had extremely significant lower E 2 , insulin, IGF1 and leptin levels compared with normal follicles ( p < 0.01).

There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among four different adaptive types including aphaenopsian, semi-aphaenopsian, anophthalmic, and surface-dwelling Trechini when their adaptability to a cave environment was used as the basis for grouping.

All data were expressed as mean ± SD and analysed using One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple range tests, Dunnett’ s T tests and Student’s T-tests (SPSS Statistics 18.0) to estimate the statistical differences of mean levels among the groups with statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Compared with the sleep deprivation group, the cognitive rate was increased in each dose group of Acanthopanax senticosus, and the difference between the high- and medium-dose groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the difference between the low-dose group was significant ( p < 0.05).

In the haplotype analysis, we found that the haplotypes with the frequency more than 1% in the rs9376267-rs9376268-rs1327475-rs7749390-rs1327474 block were extremely significant associated with the PTB risk ( P <0.01).

Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference compared with TMV, “ ∗ ” indicate a significant difference ( P < 0.05) and “ ∗∗ ” indicate an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01).

A significant difference was considered at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

From Table 2 , the model established in this experiment was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the model was appropriate.

Statistical significance was considered to be significant ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

The differences between fungal communities among other groups reached an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01).

From the p -value, it could be seen that the influence of factors B, C, AC, BC, A2, and C2 was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), the influence of factors A was significant ( p < 0.05), and the influence of factors AB and B2 were no significant ( p > 0.05).

p values were designated as follows: **** p < 0.0001 and *** p < 0.001, extremely significant; ** p ≤ 0.01, highly significant; * p ≤ 0.05, significant; and p > 0.05, n.s.

P -value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (# or * P < 0.05) and P -value of less than 0.05 was considered extremely significant (# or ** P < 0.01).

The relative content differences of eight key VOCs in WO from five varieties can be directly compared by Kruskal–Wallis tests, among which the distribution four substances, hexanal (M), hexanal (D), pentanal (M), (E)-2-hexanal (M), presented extremely significant differences (P<0.01).

Statistical analysis indicates that upon topical application of glycerol, or D-sorbitol, there was an extremely significant difference between the relative changes in reduced scattering coefficient and water content ( P < 0.01), and a significant difference for PEG 400 ( P < 0.05).

Compared with the control group, the difference was extremely significant in the juglone treatment group ( p < 0.01).

The significance threshold was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant threshold was p < 0.01.

Lastly, the rare ginsenoside F2 displayed an extremely significant difference in cell activity measurement results at the concentration of 5 μg/mL ( p < 0.01), with significant differences also observed at 10 and 20 μg/mL ( p < 0.05).

The correlation of this model was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the lack-of-fit term was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the equation fits well with experimental results.

and showed an extremely significant positive correlation with SSa and SSd in the leaves of CBC3 (p < 0.01).

Significant was defined at P < 0.05 and extremely significant defined at P < 0.01.

Correlation Analysis of Dry Matter Accumulation, Soil Water Storage and Soil Organic Carbon, Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen, and Soil Enzyme Activity From Table 3 , dry matter accumulation showed significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) positive correlations with organic carbon content, soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, sucrase, cellulase, urease and protease activity.

Among these SNPs, SNP 5’UTR-g.20523C>G showed an extremely significant effect on PC and SCS ( p < 0.01).

Notably, there is an extremely significant linear relationship between the accumulation of N and K in grains and yield ( P <0.01) ( Figures 7A–H ); simultaneously, there is also an extremely significant linear relationship between K accumulation in stems and leaf sheaths and yield ( P <0.01) ( Figures 7A–H ). 4 Discussion 4.1 Respon