“extremely significant”

Compared with the Mod group, except for the LDCE group (p < 0.05), the TC content in all other treatment groups were remarkably reduced ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 1A ); there was no significant difference in TG content in the LDEAE group, while the other treatment groups showed extremely significant reductions ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 1B ); the LDL-C content in the PEE, EAE, NBE, and HDCE groups were significantly reduced ( p < 0.01), while there was no significant difference in the WE group ( Figure 1C ).

Statistical analysis Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed employing Tukey’s Test at *P < 0.05, and ± SD was determined by Tukey's tests at p < 0.05 and extremely significant when **P < 0.01, being marked with one or two asterisks, respectively.

The influences of maltose concentration ( X 1 ), YNB ( X 5 ), and pH ( X 8 ) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01) on EPS production, while the effects of BE ( X 2 ), YE ( X 3 ), Pe ( X 4 ), and temperature ( X 7 ) were significant ( p < 0.05).

The results showed that the interaction between major type and measurement order was extremely significant, F = 18.067, p < 0.01.

tzumu populations were extremely significant correlation ( r = 0.58, p < 0.01, see Fig. 4 a).

The Spearman’s rank correlation for the researched bacterial genera was greater than 0.7 and was extremely significant (P < 0.01).

For all line charts and histograms, “*” indicates a significant difference ( P <0.05) compared with another set of data and “**” indicates an extremely significant difference ( P <0.01).

In present experiment, the difference in egg production between GP and DP was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), with an average of 100 eggs in GP (94–112) and 30 eggs in DP (2–50).

P values of p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 were considered extremely significant (**** or ***), p < 0.01 very significant (**) and p < 0.05 significant (*).

One-way repeated ANOVA showed that the fertilizer treatment, year, and the interaction of fertilizer treatment * year had extremely significant effects on soil AK, SOC, TN, TP, and pH ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 ).

An extremely significant difference was accepted at P < 0.01.

Compared with the model group, the liver and spleen indices of the CG-V, CG-VI and CG-VII groups were lowered, in which the difference between those of the CG-VI and model groups was extremely significant (P < 0.01).

Our findings showed that genetic variations among the 44 genotypes were extremely significant ( P < 0.01) for all characteristics, demonstrating the existence of considerable genetic variation among all genotypes; thus, additional subsequent research was carried out to evaluate the combining ability [ 31 , 41 – 49 ].

For the Cd of Hybrid rice, the R values that were caused by PTEs’ fractions and soil properties were 0.65 and 0.56, respectively, which reached an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01).

Differences were deemed significant (*) at P < 0.05 and extremely significant (**) at P < 0.01.

** represents extremely significant differences in mean value among different treatments ( P < 0.01).

In comparison to the control, MDHAR activity in the PAA-treated group was higher during the whole storage period, and the difference was extremely significant at 6 d, 9 d, and 12 d, which was 1.21-, 1.19- and 1.34- fold ( p < 0.01) of control group, respectively.

It could be seen from Table 4 that the economic pressure has an extremely significant positive correlation with the thought of recession and self-efficacy ( p < 0.01) and has an extremely significant negative correlation with the objective support and support utilization ( p < 0.01).

Furthermore, the ESTIMATE algorithm identified extremely significant differences between the immune scores of the two different BLCA clusters ( p < 0.01, Figure 1C ).

All the 7 linked markers in two QTL in the LGs A2 (OW-A2 and OQ-A2) and C9 (OY-C9 and OQ-C9) had significant (P<0.05) or extremely significant (P<0.01) difference except GSSR161 in OQ-A2 and SF24724 in OY-C9 and OQ-C9.

As shown in Figure 2 , when AE concentration was in the 250–2000 mg/L range, AE promoted SC proliferation after treating for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h; at a concentration of 500–2000 mg/L, cell proliferation in different groups was significantly increased by comparison with control group ( P < 0.05); when the concentrations were 1000 and 2000 mg/L, drug-treated groups showed the extremely significant difference compared to control group ( P < 0.01). 3.3.

Significant differences are indicated by “*” (P < 0.05), and extremely significant differences are indicated by “**” (P < 0.01).

At the 15th day ( Figure 3C ), however, there was extremely significant difference between Aurantimicrobium and Reyranella ( p ≤ 0.01).

In addition, the correlation analysis confirmed that pH was negatively significantly correlated with TN, AN, and NH 4 + -N ( P < 0.05), and there were significant or extremely significant positive relationships among SOC, TN, AN, NH 4 + -N, and AP ( P < 0.01, 0.05; Fig. 3 ).

The toxicity results were analyzed by Tukey’s test, and 95% confidence level analysis was performed using the statistics program SPSS; the evaluated P values were indicated by the symbols a (extremely significant difference, p < 0.01), b (significant difference, p < 0.05), and c (no significant difference, p > 0.05).