“extremely significant”

A difference was considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when P < 0.01 (**).

For the Cd of Hybrid rice, the R values that were caused by PTEs’ fractions and soil properties were 0.65 and 0.56, respectively, which reached an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01).

The influences of maltose concentration ( X 1 ), YNB ( X 5 ), and pH ( X 8 ) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01) on EPS production, while the effects of BE ( X 2 ), YE ( X 3 ), Pe ( X 4 ), and temperature ( X 7 ) were significant ( p < 0.05).

Furthermore, the ESTIMATE algorithm identified extremely significant differences between the immune scores of the two different BLCA clusters ( p < 0.01, Figure 1C ).

P values of p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 were considered extremely significant (**** or ***), p < 0.01 very significant (**) and p < 0.05 significant (*).

At the 15th day ( Figure 3C ), however, there was extremely significant difference between Aurantimicrobium and Reyranella ( p ≤ 0.01).

Significant differences are indicated by “*” (P < 0.05), and extremely significant differences are indicated by “**” (P < 0.01).

It could be seen from Table 4 that the economic pressure has an extremely significant positive correlation with the thought of recession and self-efficacy ( p < 0.01) and has an extremely significant negative correlation with the objective support and support utilization ( p < 0.01).

In comparison to the control, MDHAR activity in the PAA-treated group was higher during the whole storage period, and the difference was extremely significant at 6 d, 9 d, and 12 d, which was 1.21-, 1.19- and 1.34- fold ( p < 0.01) of control group, respectively.

The results showed that the antibiotic concentrations in feed had an extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01) with the antibiotic concentrations in pig wastes.

The ANOVA showed that the types of stress, the variety, and their interaction had extremely significant effects on the total N content in the three wheat seedlings ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 2 ).

** represents extremely significant differences in mean value among different treatments ( P < 0.01).

No between-group BW differences were noted in the 80-day-old Hu sheep; however, in the 180-day-old Hu sheep, the diseased group demonstrated a extremely significant decrease in BW compared with the healthy group ( p < 0.01); the live weight before slaughter and carcass weight were also significantly lower than those in the healthy group (both p < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

The Spearman’s rank correlation for the researched bacterial genera was greater than 0.7 and was extremely significant (P < 0.01).

Significant differences were denoted by * p < 0.05, and extremely significant differences were indicated by ** p < 0.01.

In addition, the correlation analysis confirmed that pH was negatively significantly correlated with TN, AN, and NH 4 + -N ( P < 0.05), and there were significant or extremely significant positive relationships among SOC, TN, AN, NH 4 + -N, and AP ( P < 0.01, 0.05; Fig. 3 ).

The effects of A , B , A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 on the TOC removal efficiency are extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while those of C , AB , AC , and BC are not significant ( P > 0.05).

The migration differences between 12h and 24h for these two groups are significant (P<0.05) and between 48h and 72h are extremely significant (P<0.01).

Through WGCNA, we obtained five modules and 29 flavonoid-related metabolites with extremely significant module−metabolite paired relationships (|correlation coefficient|> 0.9, P < 0.01).

The toxicity results were analyzed by Tukey’s test, and 95% confidence level analysis was performed using the statistics program SPSS; the evaluated P values were indicated by the symbols a (extremely significant difference, p < 0.01), b (significant difference, p < 0.05), and c (no significant difference, p > 0.05).

It can be seen from the Table 5 that there are extremely significant correlations between some factors (P < 0.01), such as population and GDP.

Extremely significant differences were denoted by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05, and non-significant differences by p > 0.05. 3.

Notably, HS had extremely significant effect on linoleic acid metabolic pathway ( p < 0.01) (Figure 6 ), and an influencing trend was observed in the pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism ( p = 0.0502). 4.

Our results showed that the influence of factors on the GSH yield is KH 2 PO 4 > peptone > glutamate, among which the influence of KH 2 PO 4 and peptone is extremely significant ( P < 0.01), and the influence of glutamate is significant ( P < 0.05).