“extremely significant”

papyrifera had extremely significant effects on the monthly average height of plantlets ( p < 0.01), while the root segment length and diameter had significant effects on the absorbing root’s formation rate ( p < 0.05).

Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was performed for different phenolic acids groups, with results showing that artepillin C had an extremely significant difference in terms of its content in Brazilian green propolis when compared with other compounds ( p < 0.01; Figure 4 ).

In the standardized regression equation, the regression relationship between hip breadth, body weight, and cashmere yield was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), and the regression relationship between body height and cashmere yield was significant (0.01 < p < 0.05).

The test results showed that the expression of the oxidative phosphorylation-related genes ATP5B and SDHB in the experimental group was up-regulated, and the differences were extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Statistical analysis All values were presented as mean ± SEM, and statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences (p < 0.01) among cadmium chloride-treated groups and the control were determined among various groups by ANOVA and Tukey post-test using SPSS 12.0 statistical software.

In all cases, these P-values are extremely significant ( P << 0.01), indicating that the gene pairs obtained by our method are much more likely to be functionally related than expected by chance.

The expression of the CFTR gene in HFLP was significantly higher than that in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.1), and the expression level of RRAS2 was detected to have an extremely significant difference in the HFLP diet than in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.01).

* and ** above the orange column refer to significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) differences (based on LSD test) between the two conditions for a given physiological trait of each sample (i.e., comparisons between each pair of blue and orange columns).

An extremely significant difference was inferred when P < 0.01.

Differences were deemed significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01 .

Charts were drawn using Excel software, statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA 8.0 and SigmaPlot 10.0, and the significance difference test was performed using one-way ANOVA ( ∗ indicates P < 0.05, the difference is significant; ∗∗ indicates P < 0.01, the difference is extremely significant).

When comparing the total phenolic content, GL had the highest values of 0.024 ± 0.001%, which was similar to BL 0.022 ± 0.001% ( Figure 2 A); In terms of flavonoid content, GL, RG and BL were 0.390 ± 0.005%, 0.604± 0.006% and 0.096 ± 0.004%, respectively ( Figure 2 B), and the three comparison groups had extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01).

Compared with group F, group C and group S have extremely significant differences in T1, T2, T3, and T4 angiotensin II ( P < 0.01); group B and group C are compared at T1, T2, T3, and T4.

At the 95% probability level, the results showed that the fertilizer concentration and sediment concentration of the type-H 1 drip irrigation tape reached the extremely significant level (p < 0.01).

Here, we found that a significant level ( p < 0.05) of antigen-specific sIgA was elicited in the rabbits orally immunized with recombinant lactobacillus from the 7th day onwards, and an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01) was elicited from the 14th day onwards after the primary immunization.

Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05 and extremely significant when P < 0.01.

Among these DAMs, 30 metabolites showed extremely significant differences between control and NaCl treatment ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 8 A) and were involved in different metabolic pathways, including CBB and TCA cycles ( Figure 8 A).

The t -test of the above mentioned three parameters shows an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the two groups.

A chi-square test of independence χ 2 − t e s t indicated that the frequencies of the three superior haplotypes showed a significant upward trend from wild soybeans to improved cultivars, with significant or extremely significant differences in distribution among populations P r o 2 : χ 2 = 10.8762 , p < 0.01 ; C D S 1 : χ 2 = 16.8923 , p < 0.001 ; H a p 1 : χ 2 = 14.9524 , p < 0.001 .

There are extremely significant differences in wavelength band of 600–680 nm, with P < 0.01.

Statistical significance was defined as * P < 0.05, extremely significant differences as ** P < 0.01, and non-significant differences as P > 0.05.

All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS statistical package 12.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) to determine whether the treatments of results were significant (* p < 0.05) or extremely significant (** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001) different from the control groups without 4-NP. 3 Results 3.1 Body and liver weight At the beginning of the experiment, rats from different groups showed approximately similar body weight values.

According to a chi-square test, out of 3,178 markers, 96 markers on the map showed distorted segregations ( P < 0.01) even though the extremely significant SNPs ( P < 0.01) were excluded, and the total segregation distortion ratio was 3.02%.

Differences were declared significant at p < 0.05 and were declared extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Validation of candidate SNPs in natural population We verified the candidate repetitive SNPs in the natural population based on their polymorphism (Table 3 ), and the differences of phenotypic values grouped by polymorphism reached extremely significant levels ( P < 0.01).