“extremely significant”

At the 95% probability level, the results showed that the fertilizer concentration and sediment concentration of the type-H 1 drip irrigation tape reached the extremely significant level (p < 0.01).

An extremely significant difference was inferred when P < 0.01.

There were extremely significant differences among the temperature stress treatments ( p < 0.01).

The expression of the CFTR gene in HFLP was significantly higher than that in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.1), and the expression level of RRAS2 was detected to have an extremely significant difference in the HFLP diet than in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.01).

Among these DAMs, 30 metabolites showed extremely significant differences between control and NaCl treatment ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 8 A) and were involved in different metabolic pathways, including CBB and TCA cycles ( Figure 8 A).

When comparing the total phenolic content, GL had the highest values of 0.024 ± 0.001%, which was similar to BL 0.022 ± 0.001% ( Figure 2 A); In terms of flavonoid content, GL, RG and BL were 0.390 ± 0.005%, 0.604± 0.006% and 0.096 ± 0.004%, respectively ( Figure 2 B), and the three comparison groups had extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01).

The t -test of the above mentioned three parameters shows an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) between the two groups.

Validation of candidate SNPs in natural population We verified the candidate repetitive SNPs in the natural population based on their polymorphism (Table 3 ), and the differences of phenotypic values grouped by polymorphism reached extremely significant levels ( P < 0.01).

Here, we found that a significant level ( p < 0.05) of antigen-specific sIgA was elicited in the rabbits orally immunized with recombinant lactobacillus from the 7th day onwards, and an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01) was elicited from the 14th day onwards after the primary immunization.

In samples soaked in 0.5 g/100 mL NaHCO 3 , the blanching time had a significant ( p < 0.05) effect on the relative gray levels of the bands 2, 7, and 8 bands, while the difference in the relative gray level between bands 5 and 6 bands was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Charts were drawn using Excel software, statistical analysis was performed using STATISTICA 8.0 and SigmaPlot 10.0, and the significance difference test was performed using one-way ANOVA ( ∗ indicates P < 0.05, the difference is significant; ∗∗ indicates P < 0.01, the difference is extremely significant).

Among these factors, the content of available potassium (AK) was extremely significant higher in hillsides than in river valleys ( p < 0.01), while the content of available phosphorus (AP) was extremely significant higher in river valleys than in hillsides ( p < 0.01).

Differences among groups were compared with one-way analysis of variance with the significant difference acceptance at p < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference acceptance at p < 0.01 confidence levels, respectively. 3.

With the increase of nitrogen fertilization, the canopy nitrogen concentration of summer corn increased, with the concentration under different nitrogen fertilizer treatments differing to an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01), but the difference between N2 and N3 treatments just reached a significant level ( p < 0.05).

The results were classified into five categories: extremely significant increase ( SLOPE > 0, P < 0.01), significant increase ( SLOPE > 0, 0.01 < P < 0.05), extremely significant decrease ( SLOPE < 0, P < 0.01), significant decrease ( SLOPE < 0, 0.01 < P < 0.05), and insignificant change ( P > 0.05).

The expression levels of TaCMPG1-like and TaPDR2-like reached extremely significant peaks at 4 hpt ( p < 0.01), with relative expression levels of 37.5 and 28.5-fold, respectively.

There are extremely significant differences in wavelength band of 600–680 nm, with P < 0.01.

Animals drinking heated water had better total weight gain (TWG) after the experiment, and the increase was extremely significant (2.700 ± 1.578 kg for CW and 4.795 ± 2.080 kg for HW; p = 0.011).

Although there was an extremely significant improvement in hearing after one month in both groups, group A showed a more significantly improvement in hearing by PTA ( p = 0.0124) in comparison with group B.

Among them, the difference of MGDG ((16:0/16:4) + HCOO) was extremely significant ( p = 0.013, and FC = 0.69), and the product was supposed to be a reaction intermediate.

The Strep CC mouse group showed an extremely significant decrease in Il13 transcription compared to the CC group (P = 0.0199) ( Fig. 4 A ).

A total of 74 (20.3%) patients had tumour necrosis in the pathologic specimen ( Table 1 ). Relationship Between Positive LN and Other Pathological Parameters The association between the numbers of LN assessed and the number of positive LNs was extremely significant among individuals who had positive LN (r = 0.139; P = 0.020).

The difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.02), as shown in Table 4 .

Statistical significance was set at a p -value of less 0.05, highly significant as p <0.02, and extremely significant as p <0.005. 3.

Although, when compared to the control group there were no significant differences in MN frequency in the treated groups, for NA, the differences between the frequencies of group B (treated for 120 h) and the control group were extremely significant (p < 0.02), thus demonstrating the potentially adverse effects of MeHg on C. macropomum erythrocytes after prolonged exposure. cytotoxicity genotoxicity methylmercury micronuclei assay pmc-status-qastatus 0 pmc-status-live yes pmc-status-embargo no pmc-status-released yes pmc-prop-open-access yes p