Association of socioeconomic factors with the risk of the GC incidence The output of the model, presented in Table 7 and 8 , shows this model was highly significant (F-Statistic: 82.32235; P =0.0000).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Because the investigated variables were not normally distributed (all p -values were highly significant using the Shapiro–Wilk test: study duration ( p < 0.000), study phases ( p < 0.000)), we employed correlation analysis according to Spearman.
The mean mandibular condyle inclination (Table 5 ) in horizontal (HCI) and vertical (VCI) planes demonstrated highly significant differences between both groups with P < 0.000, while anteroposterior mandibular condyle inclination (APCI) showed no significance in which horizontal and vertical condyle inclinations relative to horizontal (HP) and vertical planes (VP) were higher in the TMD group (6.32 ± 3.60 and 79.39 ± 6.20°, respectively) than the non-TMD group (4.41 ± 2.48 and 75.08 ± 6.60°, respectively).
Results: The result of this study shows that there was highly significant improvement in six-minute walk distance pre and post intervention in chemotherapy (33.75+21.55, p=0.000), radiation therapy (39.69+25.46, p=0.000) and chemoradiotherapy (32.06+16.49, p=0.000) within the group.
The correlation analysis of bone fraction (osteocalcin) and BV/TV (InVesalius + ImageJ) was highly significant ( p = 0.0000), with a moderate effect strength (rho = 0.4942) ( Figure 2 a).
Association Between Fasting C-Peptide Levels and Severity Scores of Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis ( Table 3 ) According to the Fontaine score, there was a highly significant increase in fasting C-peptide levels in patients with a IIB score compared to those with an IIA score (p=0.000).
The highly significant results of the omnibus models ( p < 0.000) indicate that these associations are highly unlikely to have occurred by chance.
A P-value was set as very highly significant (P<0.000), highly significant (P<0.001), significant (P<0.05), and non-significant (P>0.05).
Effect of Stachys circinata Extracts on Catalase Activity and Glutathione Concentrations Our data showed that the CAT activity was highly significant in cells treated with different concentrations of S. circinata extract as compared to the control group ( p = 0.000) ( Figure 2 ).
The SPAA was a highly significant positive predictor of normal vaginal delivery ( P = 0.000) with an area under the curve of 0.782 ( P = 0.000; 95%CI: 0.717–0.848).
Between-group analysis at follow-up demonstrated a highly significant reduction in perceived stress in the Yoga group, with an average change of −7.425 ( p = 0.000) compared to the UCG.
While the increase in cotton level between lint filter and condenser stages is not statistically significant, the high proportion of cotton fibers observed in the condenser water is highly significant versus lint filter and condenser stages (t-test p = 0.00 for both).
Our logistic regression model was significantly better as it explained more of the variance in the outcome, which was reflected by the highly significant chi-square value (chi-square = 2365.3, df = 17, p < .000).
Again analysis of variance test was highly significant ( P =.000) for the knowledge score and the level in the college of the participants but not significant for the attitude and the level in the college of the participants, as the P value was. 301, as shown in Table 4 .
Discriminant Analysis All trace and macro element concentrations included in the discriminant function analysis were highly significant in discriminating between the cruises (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.149; F = 47.30; p < 0.000; Table 4 ).
After adjusting for age and gender in his study, there was a highly significant difference between stage IV patients and stage I patients (HR = 8.81, 95% CI: 3.20-24.22, p = 0.000) ( 49 ).
After adjustment to these covariants, the number of potentially harmful MEs decreased highly significant after the introduction of the electronic prescribing system ( p = .000).
“Trust” had a highly significant positive association (p = 0.000);“communication” and “academic attainment” had significant positive associations (p = 0.033 and 0.024, respectively) with VBD acceptance in the students cohort, while these predictors were insignificant in the teachers community.
At baseline level (pre-operatively), the difference in levels when compared concerning the biomarkers between test and control group, there was a highly significant difference with serum HbA 1c (P < 0.000), amylase (P < 0.000), total protein (P < 0.000), glucose (P < 0.000) except CRP (P < 0.085) which was not significant.
According to BMI groups a highly significant difference in many patient satisfaction domains were found (P< 0.000).
That distinction was emphasized by pairwise examination between approaches; the difference between Retinal and Thalamic distributions not rising to significance, but both comparisons with the Cortical distribution were highly significant (ANOVA, F 2, 101 = 9.3, p = 0.000; p R-T = 0.8, p R-C = 0.000, p T-C = 0.003; Fig. 2 i).
A highly significant association was found with place of residence ( p = .000), and a significant association was found with age ( p = .050).
There was a highly significant relationship between pleural fluid, TTF-1, and lung adenocarcinoma (p=0.000).
intermedia , which was present in 83.3% (20/24) of the patients in comparison with 25% (6/24) in the control group for a highly significant difference ( p = 0.000).
For the branch models (Table 2 ), the H 1 hypothesis (H 0 as null) was found to be highly significant (H 0 –H 1 , df = 1, χ 2 p ‐value = .000), while the H 2 model (H 0 as null) was not supported (H 0 –H 2 , df = 1, χ 2 p ‐value = .142).