“highly significant”

The statistical analysis of these data ( Table 2 ) showed highly significant differences between S. byzantina (SB) and other Stachys sp.: SO, SG, SS, and SR ( p < 0.001) and significant differences between S. byzantina (SB) and S. palustris ( p = 0.011).

The highly significant dose-response association ( p < 0.001) and the high PAR documented in this study confirm the large consequences of musculoskeletal pain among eldercare workers.

All AUCs were highly significant ( p < 0.001) and were highest (0.954, 0.940 and 0.943) in the respective subgroups with ovarian cases.

A one-way MANOVA on all the social capital and health-related variables with study group (MCL, comparison) as independent variables proved to be highly significant (F [6, 1060] = 40.28, Wilk’s Lambda = 0.81, p < 0.001).

G3 and G4 groups were higher than the control G2 (+Ve), while G4 showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) compared to the control G2 (+Ve).

This change in CIE a* and b* affected the hue angle; after 20 d of room-temperature storage, the hue-angle value of LTS 50D was below 40, a highly significant difference compared to LTS 0D ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 E), indicating that the fruit skin color is more red.

Bartlett’s test was highly significant [χ 2 ( 45 ) = 226.08, p < 0.001], suggesting that variable correlations did not form an identity matrix.

All these levels of variation were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Our results ( Table 3 ) revealed that there was a highly significant difference in total time spent in sedentary activity ( p < 0.001) and in the total sedentary activity counts ( p < 0.001) in the control group compared with the ASD group.

Regarding the validity of the EMAQ against external measures, the correlations between the Negative Emotions and Situations factor of the EMAQ and the Emotional Eating factor of the TFEQ-18 were strong and highly significant (r = 0.84 to 0.92; p < 0.001) which indicates close proximity between the constructs.

The data were highly significant: the β index was equal to 0.35, t = 3.74, and p < 0.001.

However, the highly significant results ( p < 0.001) in the abstracts were strongly correlated (r = 0.61, p < 10 −6 ) with the number of p < 0.001 significances in the papers.

These effects were highly significant [repeated measures ANOVA with call type as a within-subjects variable; for drug effect F (1,89) = 116.57, p < 0.001; for call type F (4,189) = 0.65, p = 0.63; for drug × call interaction, F (4,189) = 0.26, p = 0.90].

A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was applied, and highly significant differences were accepted if p < 0.001.

Of note, differences between isolated IUGR and e-PE were highly significant at 22–25 weeks of gestation ( p < 0.001).

Of these, six cancer types showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) upregulation of the AE2 mRNA (Fig.

Among the three highly significant outcomes ( p < .001), the average student response score was 3.41 while the average faculty response score was 4.19, a difference of 0.78 on the five-point Likert scale.

No significant difference was identified between first and second 40 km endurance exercise ( p = 0.984), however, comparing both first and second 40 km endurance horses to trotter horses separately confirmed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

For the soil depth treatment, we observed a highly significant main effect of soil depth, with deep soils having much higher NPP than shallow soils ( F 1,40 = 52.01, p < .001).

There was highly significant variation among geopolitical zones overall (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001), and pairwise comparisons showed that the North West and North Central zones each had significantly higher parasite densities within infections than each of the Southern zones (Mann–Whitney tests, P < 0.01).

This shift in the steatosis grade is highly significant in our population ( p <0·001) ( Fig. 1 C). 3.2.

The dosimetric gains associated with spacer implantation were highly significant (p<0.001) for most variables.

The significance thresholds were considered significant ( P < 0.05), highly significant ( P < 0.01) or extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

In the group of all rehabilitants, a highly significant improvement of global HRQOL, anxiety, depression, and all function and symptom scores was observed at T1 ( p < 0.001).

Cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed in 15.2% of the previous sphincterotomy group, 9.3% of the sphincterotomy and stent group, and 6.1% of the ERCP-naïve group, with a highly significant p -value of <0.001.