“highly significant”

Hierarchical AMOVA analyses among all populations further confirmed that highly significant proportions of genetic variation are partitioned between islands (1.5%; p < 0.001) and among populations on Guam (1.4%; p < 0.001; Table S6 ).

With the addition of PL, the ternary SDs showed highly significant (***, p < 0.001) changes in the SL release profile ( Fig. 3 ).

From 240 to 384 h, highly significant differences were observed ( p < 0.001), indicating a sustained-release profile for NTB compared to PFD.

The Wilcoxon test indicates highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences in the individual parameter values of V max and Km between the tCRS groups.

The PRC index for set size 2 was highly significant, t (61) = 4.44, p <.001, d = 0.56, as well as the PRC index for set size 9, t (63) = 4.63, p <.001, d = 0.58.

This reduction was more than 50% of the control levels and it was statistically highly significant ( Fig. 1B , p<0.001).

Six cases of malignant lymphoma occurred whereas only 0 5 cases were expected; this dif- ference is also highly significant (P < 0 001).

0.004), perhaps due to differences in the durations of the delay period, but statistically still highly significant in both studies (all p values < 0.001).

This indicates that pretest and post-tests within Group A and Group B on asthma patients show a highly significant difference in mean values at P ≤ 0.001 (Table 1 and Table 2 ).

This is a statistic- ally highly significant relationship (P < 0.001) and the difference in mean lymphocyte count for the 4 DNCB grades is ascribable to a linear trend by analysis of variance (P < 0-001).

While 100% relief in pain (highly significant [P < 0.001**]) was observed in group-II.

The differences were re- flected as significantly higher than ex- pected mean grades for Sq.M (P < 0 05 and P < 0-001 respectively). A Friedman non-parametric analysis of variance of ratio of observed mean grade to expected mean grade of Sq.M was carried out for groups I to 24 and the results showed: (1) a highly significant increase with dose level of SWS or fraction (P < 0.001).

The difference in the number of patients with HCV antibodies between the two groups was highly significant ( P <0.001; χ 2 =15.4).

Cumulative survival for mice in Experiments 1-5 (Table III). mice was highly significant (P < 0 001, Breslow test).

On statistical evaluation, a significant association was seen for maxillary premolars and their number of roots whereas for mandibular and number of roots (p<0.05); results came out to be highly significant (p<0.001) (Table 2 ).

After post hoc testing, the following significance levels were specified: extremely significant ( p < 0.001), highly significant ( p < 0.01), significant ( p < 0.05), and not significant ( p > 0.05).

The overall regression equation was highly significant, P <.001 and 33% of the variance in quality results was explained by the combined effect of the benefits of accreditation and employee participation.

CNS relapse did not produce a significant decrease in remission length (P greater than 0.1) but reduction in survival after CNS relapse was highly significant (P = 0.001).

The Spear- man rank correlation coefficient (rs) of 0S81 was highly significant (P<0.001).

When a preliminary ("priming") dose of Cy at 50 mg/kg was given 7, 9 or 14 days before a single large dose of 250 mg/kg, lung damage was reduced, as shown by a smaller increase in ventilation rate than in those receiving 250 mg/kg alone, and this difference was significant (P less than 0.01) in the Day-14-and highly significant (P<0.001) in the Day-7-"primed" groups.

In contrast, the ACMP group exhibited highly significant levels of TOS (mmol/g tissue protein) ( p < 0.001) and significantly lower levels of TAC in the hepatic ( p < 0.05) and renal ( p < 0.001) homogenates compared to the control group.

A highly significant difference ( p > 0.001) for the female group was approved.

Chi-square and McNemar tests The association between ChatGPT-4o’s predictions and actual fracture status was highly significant (Pearson chi-square χ2(1) = 82.59, P < 0.001), indicating a strong correlation.

A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test between the distribution of the diagonal elements of the correlation matrix and the extra-diagonal elements ( Figure 4C ) resulted in a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), indicating that the predicted task maps are significantly more correlated to their actual maps than to the maps of other subjects.

al condition, high or moderate physical status, absence or presence of a post-operative complication, minimal dysphagia vs moderate or severe, and the sex of the patient (median survival is longer in women). Analysis of survival by the Life Table/Log Rank method showed the following to be highly significant variables (P < 0.001) opera- 49 tion, presence or absence of post operative complication, decision to explore or palliate, physical status and performance status.