It has a highly significant negative correlation with GAF (r = −0.903; p < 0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There was a highly significant correlation between L1CAM staining in curettage specimen and staining in the corresponding hysterectomy specimen ( P <0.001) ( Table 1 ).
The group‐by‐time interaction was highly significant (F(4, 281.005)=96.985, p<0.001).
The hospital variable block remained highly significant in the pooled Wald test ( χ 2 = 35.98 df = 6, p < 0.001), indicating persistent contextual mortality differences between hospitals after adjustment for the included treatment‐related factors.
We interpret this as follows: the discovery cohort had an extremely small sample size (only 6 pooled samples), and FDR correction tends to be overly conservative; however, all three candidate proteins exhibited highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in ELISA assays conducted in an independent large-sample validation cohort ( n = 260).
The complete resection rate increased with increasing peripheral surgical margins, and the differences between the expansion cuts at 0 mm, 4 mm, and 8 mm were highly significant in both groups of patients (p < 0.001).
The interaction between pre- and postmenopausal pack-years in relation to breast cancer risk was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and is illustrated in Fig. 1 , where the HR of breast cancer is presented for various combinations of pre- and postmenopausal pack-years, compared to never smokers.
The t-test showed a highly significant difference (t(64) = 7.24, p < 0.001) between the two settings, suggesting that the birth centre was perceived as significantly more pleasant than the hospital context.
The genotypic effect was highly significant for GP, GI, and VI (P< 0.001).
Relation between body conformation, udder morphological characteristics and milk yield Udder depth, udder height, height at whiters, and thoracic circumference had highly significant (p<0.001) effects on milk yield, while teats characteristics had no effect (p>0.05) ( Table 5 ).
The association between dry eye and conjunctival congestion was found to be statistically highly significant ( P = 0.001).
PASDAS was a direct highly significant correlated with plantar fascia and Achilles tendon thickness in in active PsA (r = 0.823 and r = 0.796, p < 0.001 respectively).
48 hours after cell seeding all groups except PCL/Coll 75% (not significant) displayed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) relative increase of metabolically active cells compared to the 24 h groups ( Figure 2(a) ).
In both cases, the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
A highly significant overall effect of time on albumin levels was observed (p<0.001).
The statistical parameters confirm the hypothesis that the differences between the results are either not significant (p > 0.05), significant (0.001 < p < 0.05) or highly significant (p < 0.001).
Cells were harvested 24 hours post transfection to assess GFI1 expression levels by quantitative RT-PCR, revealing a highly significant down regulation of both GFI1 RNA (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4A ).
None of these announced activities would actually take place, and while participants prepared for them they were asked to take part in an allegedly separate experiment on economic decisions (see Methods). Results Validation of the motive inductions A linear mixed effect model on change in motivational and affective ratings (i.e., difference scores between post-induction and pre-induction ratings) resulted in a highly significant interaction between the induction and the motive/affective state (F (16,1536) = 4.59, p < 0.001), suggesting that the latter were differentially affected by the inductions (Fig. 1 , panel B).
At day 8, the difference between escape latency of targeted NPs treated group was highly significant (p < 0.001) with all other groups and it was almost similar to control group.
The main effect of condition was also highly significant (F(1, 1545) = 34172.94, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.957), showing that deviant stimuli elicited stronger θ-β coupling than standard stimuli in both groups.
(2) generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) and structural equation models revealed that vegetation type exhibited a highly significant effect on soil aggregates ( p < 0.001), including both karst soil and vegetation-restored soil, during a homogeneous garden experiment.
In addition, reduced (≤2.0) coronary flow reserve (CFR) determined using 2D echocardiography in patients with diabetes and negative dipyridamole stress echocardiography carries highly significant and convincing worse outcome in comparison with preserved CFR (>2.0) over a follow-up of 3 years (58% vs. 16%, p < 0.001) [ 27 ].
Furthermore, the two pollutants showed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.97; P < 0.001) [ 34 ].
In model 2, with an alternate set of control variables representing family and occupational characteristics, time pressure at work continues to be a highly significant predictor of burnout ( p < .001), with no decrease in effect size.
Both the percentage of success achieved and the number of attempts required to achieve successful intubation showed highly significant associations with the airway management technique used ( p < 0.001).