“highly significant”

The mean change was highly significant between NSO and placebo ( P < .001).

YPP expressed positive highly significant correlation with HSW (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), while it showed negligible negative correlation with DF and PM.

The test for overall difference in the levels of bacterial load between the three sampling time points was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

P value ≤ 0.0001 is considered as extremely significant (****), P ≤ 0.001 as highly significant (***), P ≤ 0.01 as very significant (**), P ≤ 0.05 as significant (*) and P > 0.05 as not significant (NS), respectively.

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Similarly, the main effect within subjects was highly significant, and the effect size was very large ( M = 7.028, SD = 1.427) ( M = 1.680, SD = 1.877), F (1, 89) = 441.459, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.832 (see Figure 2 ).

Univariate analyses revealed a highly significant association between ID/anaemia and the use of iron supplements ( p < 0.001) whereas none of the other associations tested between sociodemographic factors and iron supplementation were significant.

The difference between their pain reduction was highly significant ( P <0.001).

However, we detected a highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.834, p < 0.001) between Ucp3 and Coup-TFII levels in challenged animals.

There was a highly significant correlation between the predicted and measured tumor cell fraction ( r = 0.81, p < 0.001) (Figure 4C ).

Heterogeneity and publication bias There was considerable heterogeneity among the included studies, such that the result of the Chi 2 test for heterogeneity was highly significant ( P <0.001).

On day 7 and day 14, a highly significant decrease in the ratings of total PANSS and all PANSS subscales was observed compared to baseline (all Z > 3.29; all p < 0.001).

Comprehensive pairwise correlations between all aneuploid chromosomes in the bir1Δ-ad strains revealed five highly significant ( P < 0.001) correlations ( Fig. 3 C).

Comparisons between the homozygous sister lines, raised in a growth chamber, revealed a highly significant decrease (37%, P< 0.001) in SNS in the combined lfy mutant relative to the WT ( Fig. 1B,C , Table S2 ).

Furthermore, the two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant electrode * group interaction: F [2, 28] = 8.20, p < 0.001, which reflected differences in hemisphere distribution of the N1 (figure 4 ).

A level of probability P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant, P > 0.05 as non-significant, P < 0.01 as highly significant and P < 0.001 as very highly significant. 3 Results The patients included in this study were those who suffering from chronic liver diseases such as hepatic portal hypertension, liver cirrhosis with chronic active hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Related to reliability, we observe a highly significant effect (b=0.78, P <.001) of AI being wrong more often compared with the reference category (wrong equally often), representing lower support of AI.

The comparison of the scores of right and left ears for ADDT in bilinguals also showed a highly significant difference ( P =0.001).

3A ), but beta diversity was also highly significant ( r 2 = 0.50, P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3B ).

These trends aligned with the spikes observed in the Google Ads search volume data, supporting the hypothesis that the increases in search activity are reflected in broader public discussions, indicating genuine rises in interest about hypereosinophilic disorders.” Correlation Analysis The chi-square test result was highly significant ( P <.001), indicating a strong association between the categories of search terms and the regions after normalization per 100,000 inhabitants.

Prior to optimization, a single-sample variance analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the extraction rate of the different HE varieties when under identical conditions.

The moderation effects of child gender and problem severity were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In both cases, the LRTs were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Results Our results showed highly significant increase in the level of lipid peroxidation in group IV when com pared to the control group, group II and group III (p<0.001).

Logistic regression The binomial logistic regression model was highly significant, χ 2(17) = 182.790, p < 0.001***, resulting in a moderate amount of explained variance that corresponds to a medium sized effect, as indicated by Nagelkerke’s R 2 = 0.410 [ 13 ].