Although a formal a priori power analysis was not conducted, the consistently large effect sizes and highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) across most parameters support the adequacy of the sample size for exploratory modeling and reliable pattern detection.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
At 3 h after pretreatment by AMP, both WT and KO mice exhibited highly significant suppression of BP ND ( p <0.001), but BP ND was not differentiated by genotype at this time point.
meningitidis Z2491 genome changed sites are on average 40 nucleotides closer to DUSs than the others, and the difference is highly significant ( P < 0.001, analysis of variance).
On the other hand, STD group revealed the highest spatial learning and memory as compared to all the groups, which also depicts the highly significant variation ( P < 0.001) as compared to the AlCl 3 treated group.
Among secondary end points, there was a marked and highly significant reduction in the rate of HF hospitalization among patients treated with levosimendan (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11–0.56; P = 0.001 vs. placebo).
Sway area, AP sway, and ML sway showed highly significant differences in the Kruskal–Wallis test ( p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively).
We also found a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001 to p < 0.0001; two-tailed Kolmogorov-Smirnov [K-S] test) between the mean radial CT positions of the five largest chromosomes (HSAs 1–5) and those of smaller chromosomes (HSAs 11–22 and Y).
It was associated with a 16.3% higher rate of elective inpatient admissions, compared with the matched control group (p=0.048, 95% CI 0.1% to 35.1%; 887 admissions in the integrated care group vs 661 in the control group) and a 10.7% higher rate of GP contacts, which was highly significant (p<0.001, 95% CI 6.2% to 15.4%; 25 585 contacts vs 22 654 contacts).
For abundance, in the model without interaction, the effect of abandonment was highly significant (χ 2 = 20.46, d.f. = 1, p < 0.001), but its main effect became not significant when including the significant effect of interaction ( Table 3 ).
The full RDA model (including environmental and spatial variables) was highly significant (F = 2.1, p < 0.001), and the first two axes of the full model explained 77% of the total variance (Fig. 4 a).
When compared to normal skin, vascular density in the tumour-adjacent stroma of all KAs was more than twice higher and this was highly significant ( P <0.001; Figure 3 ).
Results of hierarchical logistic regression Block 1 of the hierarchical logistic regression was highly significant, χ 2 (1) = 13.48, P < 0.001), showed depression was significantly associated with sexual satisfaction without controlling for any potential confounders.
The differencies between the three group by the one-way ANOVA was highly significant: ** = p < 0.001 or significant:* = p < 0.05.
Six of the seven anaplastic tumours of this series presented deletions at the short arm of the X-chromosome, and a highly significant association ( P <0.001) was detected between Xp sequence losses and ATC.
Highly significant necrosis was thus observed in the epinephrine-treated group (epinephrine vs methoxamine and epinephrine vs 0.9% NaCl, both at P <0.001).
Numbers of SMNs in these groups were small, but there was a highly significant trend ( P <0.001) in the risk of secondary myeloid leukaemia with a striking increase in the SIR from 2.7 in those treated pre-1970 to 69.9 in the group treated after 1979.
In fact, TPC showed highly significant correlations with antioxidant activity (r = +0.893, p < 0.001).
To evaluate whether an increasing BtMV content in BtMV‐MYB‐infected plants correlates with an increased gene expression of BvMYB1 , BvDODA and BvCYP76AD1 , a linear regression model was used to prove a highly significant correlation ( r 2 ≥ 0.95, p ≤ 0.001) between increasing BtMV content and increased gene expression for the betalain biosynthesis genes (Figure 8 ).
There was a highly significant main effect of Orientation (upright: M = 0.65 μV, s.d. = 0.10 μV; inverted: M = 0.13 μV, s.d. = 0.04 μV; F 1,15 = 20.60, p < 0.001), reflecting a large response reduction for the inverted faces, by a factor of 5.
This 9.4 year difference in life span is highly significant ( t -test, P ≤0.001).
The study also identified a highly significant difference in complex canal anatomy, comparing both MIs on either side and the presence of DLR in MFMs ( p < 0.001).
A probability value of * P < 0.05 was considered as significant, ** P < 0.01 was considered as highly significant and *** P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant. 3.
All three factors had highly significant effects on survival in the univariate analyses ( P <0.001 in all cases).
Statistically significant changes were classified as significant ( ∗ ) where p < 0.05, more significant ( ∗∗ ) where p < 0.01, and highly significant ( ∗∗∗ ) where p < 0.001 as compared with control group. 3.
A highly significant logarithmic relationship was found ( r =0.94; P <0.001), indicating that a 10% increase in apoptosis leads to a 7% decrease in blood flow.