“highly significant”

The analysis revealed that /t/-realisation has a highly significant effect on its duration (F(4, 20) = 24.559; p<0.001).

Moreover, an acute effect was observed in selective attention which improved 8.8% within 90 min of ingesting the first dose of Cognigrape ® , an improvement which was highly significant compared to placebo ( p = 0.001).

In the central macula, MF differences between age groups were highly significant in the SRL, DRL, and CC ( P < 0.001 for all).

Result: The trismus was greater (highly significant with P < 0.001) on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days in the control group.

The random effect for farm nested within district was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test shows a highly significant difference between participation in each type of activity ( Z = −6.05, p < 0.001).

The H obs values differed significantly among breeds (1-way ANOVA), and all pairwise comparisons of H obs were also highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The mixed model analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of species and of treatment on T leaf ( Table 1 ; p < 0.001).

All estimates are highly significant ( P values <.001).

In addition, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed between pneumonia-risk score and the expected survival, thus confirming pulmonary infections as a major cause of death in OLT recipients.

The difference in OS was highly significant, with 14 months (95%CI 11.9–16.0) for patients suffering from infectious complications compared to 24 months (95%CI 20.6–27.4, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).

The RC versus SC comparison in Table 1 shows that the probability of correctly assigning a resistant or susceptible individual to the correct group is better than 98%; this value differs from random allocations (50:50) by a highly significant ( p < 0.001) margin.

The mean reduction at 6 months follow up in the patients compared to baseline in the parameters like AST (50.31%), ALT (48.77%) and TG (59.71%) was highly significant ( p <0.001).

The effect of the compounds on membrane stabilization was also determined which showed that compounds 4APZ (120 and 240 mg/kg doses), 4APZAB (160 mg/kg) and 4APZVn (600 mg/kg) produced highly significant inhibition ( P < 0.001) of hypotonicity-induced haemolysis.

However, further adjusting for BMI, resulted in significant difference between the two groups in the odds of hypertension, which was higher in HIV-infected individuals (P = 0.001, Fig 1 , model 3), and there was a trend towards higher odds of diabetes in HIV-infected individuals although the difference did not reach the nominal significance level (P = 0.112); the difference in the odds of dyslipidemia became more prominent while that of current smokers became less prominent (although still highly significant; P<0.001), as did for high SCORE (with the difference becoming marginally not significant; P = 0.105).

The coefficient for sex (Male–Female) is highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a positive estimate, indicating males have higher radiodensity compared to females by about 30.44 Hounsfield Units (HU), holding other factors constant.

Differences between the groups with and without pravastatin (about 1 mmol/l) were highly significant throughout the treatment period (P<0.001).

Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant ( χ 2 = 379.8, df = 105, p < 0.001), indicating that all correlations tested simultaneously were significantly different from zero.

Jss and Kp values for 5-FU-NE3-Gel were determined to be 12.0244 ± 1.12 μg/cm 2 /h and 1.2024 ± 0.073 μg × 10 –3 , respectively, which were also highly significant in comparison of 5-FU-S (P < 0.001).

The overall association was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and no evidence of non-linearity was observed, as indicated by a non-significant P -value (>0.05) from the likelihood ratio test comparing nested linear and non-linear models.

Twenty-two genetic correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The most active compounds, with a very highly significant probability ( p < 0.001) according to an exact two-sided binomial test, were farnesol (T = 147 individuals; 37% vs.

In contrast, FCN models demonstrated a highly significant influence on all metrics, including Global Accuracy (F = 88.377, P < 0.001), Mean Accuracy (F = 8.059, P < 0.001), Mean IoU (F = 71.049, P < 0.001), Weighted IoU (F = 71.227, P < 0.001), BF Score (F = 212.725, P < 0.001), and Dice (F = 65.755, P < 0.001).

The mean NPAR values were 1.81 (SD = 0.47, Table 1 ), 4.07 (SD = 0.96, Table 1 ), and 11.17 (SD = 6.74, Table 1 ) across the low, middle, and high tertiles, respectively, with highly significant differences between groups ( P < 0.001, Table 1 ).

Comparison of composite scores of the Group 1 and Group 2 respondents indicated that there was no statistically significant difference for the scale that is related to health service-seeking behaviors, while highly significant differences were observed for the other three composite scores ( P < 0.001).