“highly significant”

The comparisons between the clinical model and the cli-radiology model, the clinical model and the cli-pathology model, and the cli-radiology model and the combined model all demonstrated highly significant differences (all p < 0.001).

4 ) Predictors of overall vaccine hesitancy The final multiple regression model predicting Overall Vaccine Hesitancy scores was highly significant, F(15, 314) = 55.62, p < 0.001, accounting for a large proportion of variance (R2 = 0.73; adjusted R2 = 0.71).

The final multivariate logistic regression model ( table 3 ), including a random effect to account for dependence among samples collected in the same study region, found a highly significant ( p < 0.001) association between prevalence and housing unit density, with 26% ( p < 0.001) increase in infection odds associated with a doubling of housing unit density.

However, for both control and experimental nests, there was a highly significant effect of time (GLMM: time effect: F 1.250 = 119.02; p < 0.001) on the excavated area.

The difference was highly significant ( p <0.001).

The differences in cortisol suppression between fosdagrocorat doses and both placebo and prednisone 5 mg were highly significant at both weeks 1 and 2 (all P < 0.001).

In the complete feedback condition ( M = 854.12 milliseconds, SEM = 42.55), participants looked at the non‐chosen lottery twice as long as in the partial feedback condition ( M = 402.22 milliseconds, SEM = 47.11), and this difference was highly significant ( t (19) = 8.84, p < .001, d = 1.49).

All included predictors were highly significant (p < 0.001), reinforcing their importance in predicting new infections.

When comparing trends between interportal and T‐capsulotomy utilization, a highly significant difference in response distributions between techniques over time was observed ( P < .001).

The examination of simple effects between treatments within sampling zones indicated a highly significant difference in Lygus density between the main treatment alfalfa (trap crop) row and the control strawberry row ( F = 46.48; df = 1, 79.36; P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference between layers II/III and V ( z = −3.77, P < 0.001) and layers II/III and VI ( z = −3.12, P < 0.001).

Histomorphometry revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between cattle egrets and ducks in the thickness and area % of connective tissues of pectoral and supracoracoideus muscle bundles (Table 3 ).

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test revealed highly significant intergroup differences ( p < 0.001) in the distributions of TRIM5 , TRIM11 , TRIM21 , and TRIM72 .

Analysis by two‐way ANOVA revealed a highly significant Diet × PM 2.5 interaction ( p < 0.001).

3.4.2 G × E 2017 Overall in 2017, there was highly significant phenotypic variation between the genotypes with respect to GY (P <0.001, Table 1 ).

Critically, the interaction was highly significant ( β = 0.29, Z = 4.07, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.15–0.44), indicating that the slope linking CsPIP output to subjective intensity differed across conditions.

A factorial ANOVA including ELF3 (wildtype and elf3 ), PPD1 (wildtype and ppd1 ) and photoperiod (SD and LD) revealed highly significant effects for these three factors and also for all two-way and three-way interactions ( P < 0.001, Data D in S1 Data ).

Targeted module scoring of the ROS signaling pathway demonstrated a highly significant enrichment in OA chondrocytes compared to healthy controls (P < 0.001), directly corroborating our in vitro observations of intrinsic oxidative stress at the transcriptional level ( Fig.

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences from global reference values, with t -statistics ranging from 8.82 to 9.89 ( P -value ≤ 0.001), confirming the elevated and non-random nature of the measured concentrations.

The correlation between pulmonary RAI uptake score and treatment response remained highly significant (Spearman’s ρ = 0.664, p < 0.001).

Table 2 includes the perceptions of the nursing on managerial items, including three regarding the “Frequency of events reported.” The overall perceptions were highly significant after accreditation in comparison with the international benchmarks for all items ( P <.001).

However, the analysis of indirect effect, through the confidence in helping the family, is highly significant (b = -1.77; z = -3.33; p < .001).

palustre , florets per plant showed a highly significant Sex × Robustness interaction (ANOVA LRT: χ21 = 788.57, p < 0.001; Table S15 ).

The association between decreasing TST reactivity and increasing mortality demonstrated a highly significant trend (χ 2 test for trend: p < 0.001).

A highly significant difference in terms of prevalence of infection was found between sheep aged 6–12 months and sheep aged 13–24 months ( P < 0.001), between sheep aged 6–12 months and sheep aged more than 2 years ( P = 0.001), but not between sheep aged 13–24 months and sheep aged more than 2 years ( P = 0.051).