“highly significant”

Even then, the difference between positive reactions using remission leucocytes and normal leucocytes is highly significant (x2 2 27X29 at 1 d.f., P < 0 001).

Notably, the changes in trans - β -carotene were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the 9- cis -isoform and 13- cis - β -carotene were observed after the intervention but not at baseline.

Vegan subjects therefore disclose highly significant ( p < 0.001) downsizing of their LBM and SM values [ 84 ].

In total, 488 analyzed features, which encompasses total production, strain contributions, and reaction abundances, were significantly different ( p -value <0.05), of which 375 were highly significant ( p -value <0.001) (Additional file 1 : Table S7).

There was a moderate, but statistically highly significant correlation between the matrix of transmission events inferred from the genomic data and the epidemiological ‘direct-contact’ events ( R =0.147; P <0.001; Mantel test).

Baseline intergroup comparison of clinical parameters Intergroup comparison of clinical parameters was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The likelihood ratio test (Wald chi-squared) of the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the model has a strong explanation power.

Results of blood glucose are highly significant ( P < 0.001), HbA1c ( P < 0.01) and lipid profile cholesterol ( P < 0.01) and TG ( P < 0.01), LDL ( P < 0.01) are significant but HDL ( P < 0.02) and VLDL not significant ( P < 0.03) in study groups as compare to control group.

Statistically, highly significant differences (PERMANOVA: Pseudo-F = 13.118, p < 0.001) were detected in the bacterial composition among groups (water and skin mucus samples).

By contrast, highly significant differences (p < 0.001) were found between cone and outside-cone regions for all stages of KC (Fig. 5E,F ).

By using the Likelihood ratio test, a highly significant association was found between patients with RE+ RE− and a KI67 index < 30% ( p = 0.001).

The probabilities of the observed number or more occurring by chance are given in the final column. Overall, a highly significant (P<0 001) excess of tumours was observed.

For the model that did not include pH values for yolk and white, the first, second and third significant canonical correlations produced Wilk’s Lambda values that were found to be highly significant through the use of a chi-square test that yielded p < 0.001.

To do the calculations, the significance level was set at: Significant = p ≤ 0.05; very significant = p ≤ 0.01; and highly significant = p ≤ 0.001 using the normal distribution of the variables.

There was no difference between the survival rates of the 3 groups when given more than 5 x 104 tumour cells, as all the animals died. There was a slight increase in the survival 90 80- 70- iso , 50 *s *\A 40 - 3 0 rate of the splenectomized group given 104 cells: 23.8% compared with 6.7% for normal and 10% for sham-operated mice (P < 0.01). There was a marked improvement in the survival rate of splenectomized mice that received 103 tumour cells, 81.6% compared with 11.5% and 20% for normal and sham-operated animals respectively. This is highly significant, with P < 0 001 calculated by the x2 test.

The z -value for the effect size was 16.65, indicating a highly significant relationship ( p < .001).

The interaction between “Stimulus” and “Reproductive status” factors was highly significant (Interaction: F (6, 75) = 9.648, P < 0.001).

The group of haematological samples showed lower mean SI values than the solid tumour group in response to Dox (42 ? 1.7 and 83 ? 2.8 respectively) and Vcr (66? 1.7 and 87 ? 2.5) and these differences were highly significant (P<0.001).

The difference between the energy availability groups was highly significant (p<0.001).

A significant reduction in colony-forming units was observed within 30 min of exposure, with a highly significant decrease ( p ≤ 0.001) at half-MIC and a still notable reduction ( p ≤ 0.05) at quarter-MIC.

Moreover, the actual BMI showed a highly significant strong correlation with the BID ( r = 0.57, p < 0.001).

SiADIPOQ also had a highly significant up-regulation effect on the mRNA level of FATP4 ( P < 0.001) ( Figure D).

It was found that: (1) venous congestion tends to straighten the nuclei in al groups; (2) mediators cause a highly significant increase in the number of pinches (P < 0.001), also if the vessels are distended by venous congestion; (3) fixation without venous congestion causes vascular collapse.

Correlation of GR with FW and SL was highly significant ( P < 0.001), while GR with ChlC was also significant ( P < 0.01).

Effect of Treatment with HSD and/or PbAc on Body Weight (BW) Gain, as Well as Epididymal and Testicular Weights The obtained results showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in final body weights (F.