“highly significant”

There was a highly significant difference between sows and piglets for all three β-diversity metrics, P < 0.001 in each case ( Figure 3 ).

A highly significant association between the standard test and the serological test at a cutoff > 10 U/ml at p = 0.001 were detected for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

Difference in age distribution of IDH1 positivity between adult and pediatric gliomas is statistically highly significant (p<0.001) ( Table 4 ).

8016.4 ± 1399.6 gm, respectively; p = 0.013, MD = 824.2, 95% CI = 325.1 to 1323.4), highly significant increase in length (72.8 ± 4.1 vs. 70.1 ± 3.6 cm, respectively; p < 0.001, MD = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.3 to 4.1), and significant increase in head circumference (44.5 ± 2.5 vs. 43.2 ± 2.7 cm, respectively; p = 0.006, MD = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.4 to 2.2).

As the test for heterogeneity was highly significant ( P <0.001), we also applied a random-effect model in calculating the HR, which was 1.39 (95% CI: 0.97–1.99) ( Figure 1 ).

There was a highly significant reduction in clinicians citing they had ‘inadequate knowledge’ to provide counselling (from 43% before GA to 11% of the cohort after GA, p < 0.001), although this remained the most commonly cited explanation of why counselling was not provided or was limited (for 17 sets of parents).

However, residual heterogeneity remained (τ 2 = 0·280, I 2 = 90·3%), with the test for residual heterogeneity being highly significant (QE = 167·68, df = 23, p < 0·001).

centrarchus microsatellite dataset revealed a low but highly significant genetic differentiation between lakes (global F ST = 0.07, P < 0.001).

The two-way ANOVA documented a nonsignificant main effect of the group ( F = 2.0; P = .17) but highly significant effects of hippocampal subfield ( F = 35.0; P < .001) and of the group × hippocampal subfield interaction ( F = 4.2; P = .002).

3 Results When comparing the demographic variables between the groups, the mean age was the oldest in the P + CAD group (51.57 ± 5.19 years), showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

As expected, the AR1 diagonal was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Also, there was a highly significant positive correlation between SP leptin and SP resistin (r=0.568, p= 0.001).

The DeLong test indicated a highly significant difference in AUC between the 8-item GDCS (AUC = 0.936) and the BRASS (AUC = 0.518), with a Z-score of 11.929 and a p -value < 0.001, which demonstrated the substantially better performance of the 8-item GDCS.

In the statistical analysis of the significance of this difference, considering the clustered nature of data of participants within centers and a between-cluster randomization design, the parameter estimating the effect of the group was not significant ( p = 0.27), while the hypothesis test regarding the significance of the “center” random effect was highly significant ( p <0.001).

Results Genotype/breed effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all hair and cashmere properties and quality characteristics, except; curl degree, elongation at break cortical cell dimensions (length and diameter) which was different at ( P = 0.033), ( P = 0.032), ( P = 0.148) and ( P = 0.559), respectively, but no effects were detected for sex or interaction between breed and sex ( P > 0.05) (Supplementary File 1 , Tables S2 : S8 ).

Roc-curve of hysteroscopy usage to predict diagnosis; adenomyosis sensitivity was 73.33% and specificity 95.29% and fibroid sensitivity was 73.33% and specificity was 97.65%. Both groups of therapy revealed; highly significant decrease in follow up menorrhagia in continuous Norethindrone group ( P < 0.001).By using ROC-curve analysis; Norethindrone administration predicted decreased menorrhagia pain with AUC was 0.973.

Group differences were highly significant between children and teens ( p = 0.001) and between children and adults ( p < 0.001).

stoebe and its neighbouring communities In the competition containers, biomass of EU neighbouring community explained a highly significant and substantial amount of the variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.39, Δlog-likelihood = 4.91, P < 0.001; Fig 4a ), but NA neighbouring community did not explain variation in biomass of C . stoebe (R 2 = 0.05, Δlog-likelihood = -13.96, P = 0.48; Fig 4b ).

There was a highly significant difference in fGCM concentrations between sites (Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-squared = 15.499, df = 2, p < 0.001), with multiple comparisons showing values from Wildendürnbach to be significantly lower than those at Czech sites, which showed no significant difference.

The mean API was almost twofold higher in boys (33.0 ± 4.4) than in young men (18.1 ± 2.8), with this difference being highly significant ( P < 0.001, Table 2 , Fig. 1 ).

The main effect of TASK was highly significant ( F = 16.601, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.293).

A significant reduction in total cholesterol (p < 0.002), Triglyceride (p < 0.020), and VLDL (p < 0.02) was observed aiding to the reduction in the fat accumulation with the highly significant hypoglycemic effect of fasting blood glucose (p < 0.001).

(2025 ), there was a strong and highly significant ( P < 0.001) relationship between cloacal temperature (a proxy of T b ) and T s , the latter estimated using IRT ( Bakken et al., 2005 ).

Notably, 24/29 (82.8%) OBI positive cases had NASH, whereas 5/29 (17.2%) had NAFL with a clear, highly significant association between OBI and NASH ( p = 0.001).

However, synchronization with distinct click trains was consistently robust and highly significant ( P < 0.001, one-tailed paired t test, FDR-corrected; Fig. 3 K), and the mismatch signal was also significant for both types of trains ( P < 0.001, paired t test; Fig. 3 L).