Lines that were made using the REx2 containing vector showed a marked reduction in expression outside the nervous system [ X 2 ( df = 1) = 23.89, p < 0.001], that was highly significant for muscle [ X 2 ( df = 1) = 30.96, p < 0.001] (Figure 3A ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The results revealed highly significant linear correlations ( p < 0.001) between the Cd concentrations in the edible parts of faba beans and those in the pods, stems, and leaves.
Earliest successful learning could be shown for groups (s) and (D-6), with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in their RT reduction (SD) between the first and second block of practice with 143.5 (15.0) ms and 227.5 (53.1) ms, respectively.
There were highly significant differences between treatment doses for tumor burden and hypoxia ( P < 0.001).
The 7–8-week group had a non-significant increase in median SLEB thickness compared with the controls (0.239 vs 0.121 mm, p = 0.06), whereas the 15–16-week group exhibited a highly significant difference (0.370 vs 0.121 mm, p < 0.001).
A probability (p) value was considered *: significant ( p < 0.05); **: very significant ( p < 0.01); ***: highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The majority of differences in the running disciplines were highly significant for all measuring systems ( p < 0.001).
The between-group difference was highly significant ( P < .001), further supporting the notion that delayed initiation of shoulder exercises contributes to reduced postoperative fluid accumulation.
The second candidate model which incorporated tensile properties (referred to as “w/tensile”) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), reinforcing the strong relationship between extrusion parameters and mechanical properties.
DNA concentration demonstrated a highly significant correlation with CRP concentration ( r = 0.661, P < 0.001), procalcitonin concentration ( r = 0.820, P < 0.001), SOFA score ( r = 0.710, P < 0.001), and APACHE II score ( r = 0.559, P < 0.001).
The statistical significance level was established as p ≤ 0.05 as significant, p ≤ 0.01 as highly significant, and p ≤ 0.001 as most significant. 3.
The AMOVA revealed a highly significant overall divergence among populations (F ST =0.572, p<0.001), such that 57% of the mtDNA variation was apportioned to divergence among populations.
The statistical analysis showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the two groups of cows for the intake of all individual FA and groups of FA from the diets.
The difference in prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae among the study and control groups was highly significant with a P < 0.001 [ Table 1 ].
However, the evolution with time revealed a very highly significant linear increase ( p < 0.001).
Ala exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with liver TG ( P < 0.001).
We found a strong and highly significant correlation between UCPs and plasma C-peptides for DPZ animals (r s = 0.845, p<0.001, Figure 1e ), but not CS animals (r s = 0.390, p = 0.093, Figure 1f ).
The densitometric differences in protein expression of both actin and BiP in healthy and infected plants turned out to be highly significant ( p -value ≤ 0.001).
Overall, the difference in tenure is highly significant (chi-square 480, p = 0.001) and lends support to the findings of Stebbing and Spies-Butcher (2016) concerning the high levels of outright homeownership in the older age cohort.
The full model was highly significant (F 12.612 = 28.565, p < 0.001; with an R 2 = 0.36).
Brackish water showed highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) effect on number of spikes during all years.
C showed a highly significant positive correlation with the C:N ratio (P < 0.001) and a significant positive correlation with the C:P ratio (P < 0.05).
8D ), in which only 80±3 out of 608±18 links (13%) were intra-continental links; again, a highly significant decrease by more than one-half compared to the GMN (empirical P -value <10 −3 ).
When relating extraction times to particle size distribution, a highly significant positive association was found with Q 100μm (p < 0.001).
The difference in acquisition time between both sequences was highly significant ( p < 0.001).