“highly significant”

Preterm labor was present in 48.2% of the cases as compared to 14.1% of the controls, and the difference was highly significant ( P <0.001). 54.7% mothers in the case group and 31.8% of the mothers in the control group had normal parturition, while other mothers delivered through a caesarean section.

We found highly significant differences between the groups in age, total bilirubin levels, direct bilirubin levels, G6PD activity, red blood cell counts and hemoglobin concentrations ( p < 0.001).

Trend changes observed in some of the control departments were smaller, and the difference between trend changes in the medical service and those in control departments were highly significant for overall use and cephalosporin use reductions (p < 0.001) as well as for the increasing use of penicillins (p < 0.001).

Biological activity It was found that the differences between the samples were statistically highly significant (ANOVA p -value < 0.001).

The Chi-square test was highly significant refuting the null hypothesis of an equal distribution of visitors among treatments (χ 2 (0.05,2) = 50.1, P<0.001, two tail test).

This drop is highly significant ( P < 0.001) and confirms our previous data showing that ASAP/MAP9 protein expression is highly decreased in the colon cell lines tested [ 27 ].

The genetic differentiation between goat and sheep was not significant (P = 0.1318) whereas the values obtained for the other comparisons were highly significant (P < 0.001).

So, controlling for depression, there was no main effect for group [arousal: F (1, 38) = 0.54, p = 0.47; valence: F (1, 38) = 0.70, p = 0.41] or interaction effects group x task [arousal: F (1, 38) = 0.23, p = 0.63; valence: F (1, 38) = 1.41, p = 0.24], whereas effects of task were highly significant [arousal: F (1, 38) = 63.18, p < 0.001; valence: F (1, 38) = 58.23, p < 0.001].

The multivariable results confirmed that the net differences between the early group (intervention phase) and late group (control phase) were highly significant for all the following biophysical indicators assessed: weight, waist circumference, SBP, DBP (all P values < .001).

IL-8 levels in NL before treatment correlated with IL-8 levels during AB therapy in a highly significant manner (r = 0.719, P = 0.001).

Figure 1B shows that the difference between the 1st and 2nd run was highly significant (three-way ANOVA; P <0.001).

A highly significant down regulation of ACTA2 was observed in response to RHOA knockdown in each of the osteoblast-like cell lines examined ( P<0.001 ).

The differences in CBSV infection among cassava varieties was highly significant (ANOVA, F 2,6 = 24.1, P<0.001).

The association between the presence of intestinal parasites and children on solid food diet (exclusively or had combined feeding) was highly significant (χ2 = 23,226, P ≤0.001).

A highly significant main effect of the within-subject variable PHASE was also observed [ F (2, 68) = 22.49, p < 0.001], but there was no reliable 2-way interaction between PHASE and either of the two group variables [PHASE × WORD: F (2, 68) = 2.52, p = 0.09 PHASE × LEXICAL: F (2, 68) = 1.20, p = 0.31].

The time interval (median 573 days, range 173–8112 days) between first and second irradiation was as expected a highly significant prognostic factor (p < 0.001) as longer intervals indicate a longer treatment history and thus regularly enhanced survival.

The difference in FI rates was highly significant between age groups (p < 0.001).

Caffeine intake of 200–≤400 mg/day was associated with 58% risk reduction (OR = 0.42, 95%CI = [0.25–0.69], p<0.001), and that of 400 mg–≤600 mg/day was associated with a highly significant 80% reduction (OR = 0.20, 95%CI = [0.08–0.51], p<0.001), and >600 mg/day had also strong 79% reduction (OR = 0.21, 95%CI = [0.09–0.52], p<0.001) comparing to the lowest caffeine intake group with 0–≤200 mg/day.

Differences were regarded as statistically significant and as statistically highly significant if p values were <0.05, and p < 0.001, respectively.

The differences in average performance between the three types of HPDs (passive earplug, active earplug and active earmuff) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), whatever the comparisons (passive earplug vs. active earplug, passive earplug vs. active earmuff and active earplug vs. active earmuff).

The density of type C LCs [ Figure 6 ] was markedly increased in chronic gingivitis compared to that of normal gingiva and this finding was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].

In all the above tests, the P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant; P value >0.05 was taken to be statistically not significant; P value <0.01 was taken to be statistically highly significant and P value <0.001 as very highly significant.

OSCC with lymph node metastasis showed only slight lymphoplasmocytic infiltration in a highly significant manner ( P < 0.001).

Grain appearance quality The percentage of undamaged grains (UDG) was lower in FACE than in AMB by 5.4 percentage points (Table 2 , P = 0.083), averaged over all cultivars, but with highly significant cultivar differences ( P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference detected among groups for peak troponin levels (p<0.001).