“highly significant”

However, there still remained a highly significant main effect of SXB on BMI ( F (1,66.799) = 14.916, p < .001). 4 DISCUSSION Our findings (i) confirm that SXB reduces BMI in narcolepsy type 1 patients and (ii) suggest that this is a long‐lasting effect.

New: Figure 2 Kidney function using a) creatinine and b) GFR as surrogates during the follow-up period of 60 months (black HC, grey nESPC) HC = historic cohort, nESPC = new European Senior Program cohort, *** highly significant, p < 0.001 Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

The peritoneal membrane was easily permeable for the low-molecular-weight NT-proBNP and correlation with serum levels was highly significant ( r = 0.998, p < 0.001), while dialysate detectability and correlation with plasma concentrations were poor for both GDF-15 ( r = 0.548, p = 0.008) and for the relatively high-molecular-weight cNEP ( r = − 0.194, p = 0.134) (Fig. 1 b).

Serum uPA, fPSA, %fPSA, P2PSA, and PHI levels showed highly significant difference between three studied groups (p ≤ 0.001).

The differences in distributions were highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis-Test, H-Test: p < 0.001).

The difference in referring department between PRP-Yes and PRP-No groups was highly significant ( P < .001).

Differences were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05 (∗), very significant when p ≤ 0.01 (∗∗), and highly significant when p ≤ 0.001 (∗∗∗).

This is highly significant (p<0.001) - we did not detect a similarly sized or larger coherent network with 1,000 randomly selected gene sets of the same size – and suggests that a large portion of the genes that are differentially expressed between the LG/J and SM/J strains are co-ordinately regulated in mouse muscle independent of strain.

This is also seen in the mixed model, where a distinct and highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in IOV is seen with increasing levels of healthcare professional support immediately after the death.

A likelihood-ratio test against a null model was highly significant χ 4 2 = 174.75 , p < 0.001 , and the pseudo-R 2 was 12.0%.

napus seeds show a highly significant negative correlation ( r = −0.22, P < 0.001) in the natural population (Figure S6 ).

scariosum and statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) for R. bicknellii ( Table 2 and Table 3 and Table S6c–d in Supplementary file S5 ).

In contrast, analysis of US specimens yielded a highly significant result ( r statistic = 0.515, p = 0.001).

The interaction between genotype and salinity was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for yield ( Table 1 ).

Night temperature was also a highly significant (df = 1, 109, F = 59.75, p < 0.001) driver on time to 50% germination (germination rate, 1/T 50 ), accounting for over one third of percentage variance in response.

The machine learning–based correlation matrix consolidated the findings of the non-imputed matrix in general; most importantly, it also produced a very highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative correlation between age and EI.

Alternative analysis by comparison of individual vessel size for each tissue type was highly significant ( Supplementary Figure S1A ) and analysis of vessel density showed a 2.4-fold increase in the number of vessels per field in NU compared with IP tissue ( p = 0.001, Figure 3 A).

Based on diagnosis criteria, there was a highly significant difference in MUAC P value < 0.001) but not for WHZ ( p = 0.056).

The differences among different study groups in terms of apoptotic cell count and AI were highly significant ( P =<0.001) ( Table 1 , Figure 4 ).

The differences between the MA and SA patterns and between the LA and SA patterns were highly significant (both P < 0.001).

Moreover, codeine consumption in the first, second and third months after surgery was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group, with highly significant time*group interactions; P < 0.001, F = 31 and df = 1.7 (Fig. 5 ).

The difference in RRs by continent was very marked and highly significant (p < 0.001) for all lung cancer and adeno, but less marked, though still significant (p < 0.01) for squamous.

Paired-sample multivariate omnibus test was highly significant [ T 2 = 270.23, F (7393) = 38.02, p < 0.001].

The co-expression analysis of lncRNA HOTAIR and MTHFR gene by MEM showed highly significant co-expression ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 d).

A highly significant difference was observed in the pooled population (1.47 (1.25–1.72); p<0.001; adjusted for trial variance).