“highly significant”

vaginatum ( Table 2 ), and species' effects were highly significant on an area, mass, or N basis (all P < 0.001, Table S1 ).

Analysis of paternity patterns in relation to +/ t genotype Overall, 33.8% of pups of +/ t females were sired by +/ t males, compared to 63.8% of pups of +/+ females ( Table 1 ), a highly significant difference (Pearson's χ 2 = 11.83, df = 1, P < 0.001).

This difference is highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Depending on the sample number ( n ), statistical test were done using either the Student’s t test with bilateral distribution and equal variance (results were considered significant for p <0.05 and labeled with *), or the Mann-Whitney rank sum test (results were considered statistically highly significant when p <0,001 (***); significant when p <0,01 (**); marginally significant when p <0,05.

Within Group N, highly significant difference was found between anesthesia times of ASA subgroups ( P < 0.001), whereas the same was not significant in Group R ( P = 0.518).

This resulted in a highly significant decrease of the ANG-2:ANG-1 ratio at both time-points (p < 0.001 for month 6, p = 0.002 for month 12, Figure 1 C).

Correlation of homopolymer’s length and quality values is -0.195 which is highly significant (p<0.001), Figure 3 illustrates correlation with boxplots where base quality scores decrease with the length of homopolymers.

RRI scores in the DSP × 90–2131 RILs showed highly significant genotypic and block effects ( P < 0.001) for each strain with the exception of Ae85.

While the main effect of Condition was not significant ( F < 1, n.s .), the Game × Condition interaction was highly significant, F (1, 90) = 12.25, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.12 (see Figure 2 ).

Bivariate correlation of changes in absolute concentrations of 25OHD, PTH, adjCa and ALP levels showed a highly significant correlation of adjCa with PTH levels only ( r =0.50, P =0.001).

Pearson Chi-square (χ 2 ) and Freeman–Halton extension of Fisher exact probability test revealed a very highly significant ( P < 0.001) association between each of the cytological grading systems and SBR's histological grading system.

For the 8-OHdG levels, lycopene showed a highly significant reduction in scores at the first week when compared to the other two groups ( P <0.001).

BLL was found to have highly significant difference between both the groups ( P < 0.001).

Risk and management intensity Regression analysis in Figure 3 indicates the highly significant linear relation between risk and management intensity indexes (R2 = 0.433, P<0.001).

The effect of elevation fitted with the spline was highly significant (df = 5.55, p<0.001), suggesting the highest richness around 1,400 m a.s.l.

This deviation in the distribution of DNA-binding domains (DBDs) amongst the global regulators from the background distribution of DBDs was found to be highly significant (Figure 8 A; p < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test).

Moreover, a highly significant main effect of “CS-emotion” was found [ F (1, 27) = 65.56; p < 0.001]: the disgust pictures were rated as significantly more unpleasant as compared to the control pictures (see Figure 1 ).

GI scores The GI showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) reduction in gingival inflammation in all the three groups on day 7 as well as on day 14.

The paths leading to eating disorders risk were all significant at the 10% level of significance, but only depression showed a highly significant effect (path coefficient =0.456, p < 0.001).

The criterion of evaluating statistical significance between the experimental and control groups was as follows: p value <0.05 was considered significant and marked as *, p <0.01 as highly significant and marked as **, and p <0.001 was very highly significant and marked as ***.

In the group of multiparous women, cephalic presentation at term, with at least one previous scar (group 5), there was a highly significant correlation found with the indication “one past CD” (correlation with overall CD rates: Spearman's rho 0.86; P < 0.001— Figure 2(d) ).

Results Despite relatively small group of tested individuals (altogether just 10 young and 16 old people), we were already able to demonstrate highly significant (p<0.001) decreases in the amounts of both μ- and m-calpain in peripheral blood T (CD4 + , CD8 + ) lymphocytes of old individuals as compared to young people (Figure 1 A, B).

chebula brought a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in number of cough efforts in the dose of 50 mg kg −1 body weight.

All models are fairly similar and highly significant (p<0.001), although they explain a modest share of the variance of the respective independent variable (R 2 =0.11–0.16).

Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS) Highly significant setting PRS differences were found (F 3,40.97 = 12.526, p < 0.001) with post-hoc pair-wise comparisons demonstrating that the Very Natural setting was perceived as more restorative than the other three settings (all p < 0.001; See Figure 5 ).