“highly significant”

This association was highly significant (χ2 = 71.7, p < 0.001), indicating a strong relationship between the duration of silica exposure and the risk of developing COPD.

Patients with depression after PAO showed a highly significant negative correlation with SF-36 by Pearson correlation (p < 0.001).

The 100 μmol/L apigenin treatment led to a substantial and highly significant (P < 0.001) increase in sperm membrane integrity compared to control, improving from 40% integrity in control to 68% integrity with 100 μmol/L apigenin (Fig. 3 a).

A highly significant correlation existed between Ra and VW ( p = 0.001, R 2 = 0.9803).

Nevertheless, by sorting these entities according to their malignancy, a highly significant correlation of MPS1 mRNA expression and tumor aggressiveness was detectable ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.263) ( Figure 1 b).

This difference between the APOE4 and the APOE3 cells is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

All of the statistical tests were considered significant for p < 0.05, highly significant for p < 0.001, and very highly significant for p < 0.0001. 3.

The comparison was highly significant (U = 2.5; p < 0.001).

Results The KMO test approved the sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.873), and the Bartlett test was highly significant ( p < 0.001), fulfilling the conditions for a factor analysis.

Furthermore, the relationship between sepsis and gene modules was showed in Figure 4C , the greenyellow module displayed a highly significant positive correlation with sepsis (r = 0.66, P < 0.001), whereas the bule module showed the strongest negative correlation with sepsis (r = −0.93, P < 0.001).

The multivariate multiple regression analysis showed highly significant association (overall p<0.001) of the LDD and its structural components with age, lumbar spine BMD (as well as with hip BMD, not shown), body weight and exercise.

Notably, the differences between Cutaneotrichosporon and Gibberella were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating distinct ecological roles or responses to environmental conditions (Fig. 7C ).

Whilst there has been highly significant genetic progress in the spring two row gene pool since the introduction of Triumph in 1980, and prior to 2000 (Fig. 2 ) ( β = 0.16; p = 0.001; R 2 = 0.48), the rate of progress since 2000 is non-significant ( β = − 0.06; p = 0.245; R 2 = 0.04) with a large scattering of the datapoints, indicating that breeding progress for the character has stalled or that the maximum attainable phenotype has been reached.

The overall model effect was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a standard error of estimate of 14.42 mL/min.

Results Generally, the results of MANOVA showed that the effects of sex, low temperature, and their interaction were highly significant ( P ≤0.001; Table 1 ).

Cure rates at 8 weeks were found to be greater than that at 4 weeks for all groups which were found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The postoperative change in sphere, cylinder, and SE was highly significant in the two groups ( p < 0.001).

This difference between species was highly significant along PC2 (10% of variation; F 1,127 = 131.1, p < 0.001) and suggests a general trend of expansion of both the proximal and distal area of the MFB in H. melpomene Postman phenotypes compared to H. erato .

Bilateral IRI for 30 min caused significant deterioration of renal function with highly significant s-creatinine and BUN elevation ( n = 5 sham mice, n = 6 mice per IRI group, one-way ANOVA, *** p < 0.001).

The mean orientation difference, 14.7 ± 5.53° (mean ± standard error across participants), was highly significant, t(49) = –18.92, p < 0.001, lgBF = 21.0.

A correlation coefficient of 0.54 was obtained, which was highly significant ( P < 0.001, two-tailed test).

There was a highly significant association between the category of the users and the themes of the tweets (χ 2 40 = 16904.4, P <.001).

Comparing the results obtained for 16 samples by the two different methods showed a highly significant correlation between the methods ( r = 0.98, p < 0.001 using Spearman correlation; data not shown).

* indicates significant ( p < 0.05) and ** highly significant ( p < 0.001) statistical difference (Mann-Whitney U test).

The BODI construct validity was supported by a highly significant correlation with the VDI (r=0.740, p<0.001) measured in the multicentre cohort.