“highly significant”

After manipulation (T3), the mean cuff pressure was 41.00 ± SD of 6.407 in Group C and 33.30 ± SD of 4.824 in Group T, with a highly significant P value of <0.001.

The log-rank test indicates highly significant differences between groups (p < 0.001).

We found a highly significant enrichment of FGF ligands and FGFRs in cases with PTEN loss (p<.001; Figure 7C ).

The platelet count was notably lower in newborns with SIRS (207.92 × 10 9 /L) compared to those without (260.83 × 10 9 /L), with the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

High-risk tumour depths (≥4mm) demonstrated a highly significant negative dependence on both PO 4 -SMAD2 (Table 2 , C.C −0.214; p=0.001) and PO 4 -SMAD3 (Table 2 , C.C −0.200; p=0.002) ( Supplementary Figures 7A and 8 ) histoscores, suggesting a correlation between thicker tumours and lower SMAD2/3 phosphorylation.

TNFAIP8L3, however, presents a highly significant association (P < 0.001), suggesting that elevated BM blast counts are strongly linked to high TNFAIP8L3 expression.

5 ), whereas a highly significant difference was observed in the disinhibition model ( P < 0.001, n = 88 for TBS, n = 109 for peptidergic disinhibition, Mann-Whitney rank sum test) in the distribution peaked with shorter intervals with bin center 75 ms (mean interval 84 ± 7 ms).

When tree height (H) was included in the DBH-alone model, the parameters of model M2 were highly significant (p < 0.001) with a percent relative standard error (PRSE) of the coefficients < 25% for both plantation and natural forests.

The constrained model explained 46.1% of the total variance (adjusted R 2 = 0.403) and was highly significant ( F = 7.98, p = 0.001).

However, a highly significant and dose‐dependent increase in the average cross‐sectional area of blood vessels was seen with pASCs, which held true in both graft and granulation tissue ( p < .001).

Results The results of our study confirmed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in the etch pattern of both groups [Tables 5 and 6 ] with SEP showing lower adhesive penetration, thus producing a more conservative etch pattern contributing to its lower bond strength.

Primary outcome AM and UM comparison of 2 h-ΔBG across the total sample showed a highly significant difference (30.9 ± 42.3 vs. 71.5 ± 45.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001).

A 4-way repeated-measures ANOVA (window location × frequency region × rate × change direction) revealed a highly significant main effect of window location ( F (1, 12) = 36, p < 0.001).

Notably, after adjusting for age and phenotype, a higher EDSS emerged as a highly significant independent predictor of elevated sNfL Z scores (B = 0.18, 95% CI 0.10–0.26, p < 0.001).

These differences were highly significant (F=32.21, P<0.001), indicating that texts generated by GPT-5 performed best in terms of understandability and actionability as patient education materials.

Mean LogMAR BCVA improved from 1.84 ± 0.62 preoperatively (approximately 3/60 to hand-motion level) to 0.41 ± 0.38 at three months (approximately 6/12-6/18 level), representing a mean improvement of 1.43 LogMAR units, a very large effect size that is both statistically and clinically highly significant (p < 0.001).

The addition of random intercepts unveils even better results (AIC = 1300.00, BIC = 1312.00) and additional and highly significant coefficients with p <.001.

Second Nephrology Ward (direct intervention group): A highly significant immediate reduction in CST rate (-71.081%, P < 0.001) and a significant sustained declining trend (slope: -0.121, P < 0.001) (Table 4 ; Fig. 2 B).

The Ischemia-Reperfusion (IR) group experienced the most volatile changes, characterized by a rapid and highly significant initial decrease of approximately 3.00% (from 36.59 ± 0.07 °C to severe hypothermia at 35.41 ± 0.1 °C at 10 min, p < 0.001).

An “*” was used to denote a trend (unadjusted p < .05), “**” represents statistical significance (adjusted p < .05), and “***” indicates a highly significant result (adjusted p < .001).

Global fit metrics remained highly significant ( Table 15 B), with a Likelihood Ratio Test value of 61.84 (P < 0.001) and a Wald Test value of 18.56 (P = 0.00034), verifying that the integrated panel's performance was stable and not driven by outliers.

6 A) was highly significant, F (1.4, 14.1) = 13.76, p = .001, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{p}^{2}$$\end{d

These differences were highly significant ( p -value<0.001).

The results indicated a highly significant deviation from the hypothesized uniform distribution, X 2 (df = 3, N = 498 publication frequencies) = 382.35, p < 0.001.

During the first 12 h of the postoperative course, patients in the QLB group received an average of 4.13 (+/− 3.29) mg of morphine, which is approximately 5.6 mg of morphine (95% CI 3.44; 7.77) less than the control group without the block, who received an average of 9.73 (+/− 4.93) mg (Student’s T-test for independent samples, p < 0.001, the difference between the groups is statistically highly significant) ( Table 2 ).