“highly significant”

Furthermore, the two pollutants showed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.97; P < 0.001) [ 34 ].

In model 2, with an alternate set of control variables representing family and occupational characteristics, time pressure at work continues to be a highly significant predictor of burnout ( p < .001), with no decrease in effect size.

The number of rescue analgesic requested was significantly lower in Group A than Group B and the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

VAS score on coughing showed statistically highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) with a mean of 2.03 ± 0.65 in study group and 3.71 ± 0.52 in control group [ Figure 2 ].

Results: Number of years of exposure to passive smoking was highly significant to the extent and intensity of gingival pigmentation ( P < 0.001).

The increase in MT ONH , MT PPR and OPP was highly significant (p < 0.001 each).

Observed differences were identified as statistically significant if p < .05, and highly significant if p < .001.

The difference between spironolactone and control was, not surprisingly, highly significant (p<0.001).

This test of association is highly significant with P = 0.001.

However, in agreement with our assembly data, reduced IIS resulted in a highly significant, dfoxo‐ dependent, threefold increase in proteasomal activity in the gut (two‐way ANOVA interaction term P < 0.001; Fig 5 D).

The Kaplan–Meier survival curves of low CRP/PNI ratio versus high CRP/PNI ratio showed a highly significant separation ( P <0.001, Figure 2C ).

All group differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The difference was highly significant (P<0.001).

Carotenoid content per unit leaf area (CarLA) also displayed highly significant difference between the accessions, growth regimes and acclimation status ( P < 0.001 for all factors; Table 2 ) with significant two and three way interactions between the genotypic and environmental factors ( P < 0.001 to 0.015).

A highly significant intraobserver correlation (r=0.983, P<0.001) was found for repetitive measurements, as was the case for interobserver variability (r=0.973, P<0.001) between the photographs.

There was also a highly significant difference between different income classification of countries ( P < 0.001), with a longer median length of excretion for high-income countries (2.5 years, 95% CI: 1.3–3.7) than upper-middle income countries (1.0 year, 95% CI: 0.9–1.3), lower-middle income countries (1.0 years, 95% CI: 0.8–1.5), and low-income countries (0.8 years) (Figure 3 C).

However, scatter plots demonstrated that there were highly significant correlations between measurements obtained from CT and MRI-DIXON-F images, in terms of peripouch fat thickness (r = 0.823, P < 0.001,Fig. 4a ), AreaM (r = 0.773, P < 0.001, Fig. 4b ) and AreaH (r = 0.862, P < 0.001, Fig. 4c ).

The result of Mardia's test of multivariate normality was highly significant ( z = 27.04, p < 0.001).

Results Confirming Construct Validity of the AMQ For the first month of ATS use, the CFA provided highly significant factor loadings reaching from 0.48 to 0.95 (all p < 0.001; Table 2 ).

Driving statements of therapeutic misconception Coefficients of correlation between component statements for the “Therapeutic misconception” factor and the factor score ranged from 0.437 to 0.703, being highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all statements (see Table 5 ).

With adjustment of the model for effects due to animal pairings and differences in food efficiency among pairs, the Hotelling statistic was highly significant for an overall increase in β-oxidation associated with bean feeding ( p = 0.001).

In H1299 cells, cisplatin exposure promoted the emergence of a highly significant ALDH1+ve CSC subset in PT cells (9.01±0.99%, p<0.001) and significantly enriched the ALDH1+ve subpopulation in the corresponding CisR subline from 10.5±1.02% to 19.17±2.43% (p<0.05).

Factor “NREM sleep bin” was highly significant [ F (15,195) = 128.85, p < 0.001) and a significant interactions were obtained for “genotype” ∗ “phase” [ F (1,13) = 15.21, p = 0.002].

The effect of vowel context was highly significant, F (2, 18) = 24.54, p < .001.

The findings indicate that the differences in gut microbiota between the ND, HFD control, and PTE treatment groups were highly significant (p < 0.001).