The effect of fertility status of the bulls was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for JAC and ABL accounting for 47.64 and 21.65% of the total variance observed in the produced MFI upon lectin binding.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Mixed linear model analysis of these data showed that the hyperopic shift induced by red light was highly significant ( P < 0.001) while the refractive change under blue light was not significant ( P = 0.49).
The 12 week EWL was highly significant (p < .001).
The difference was highly significant ( P = 0.001).
The Omnibus test was highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the model’s overall classification accuracy was 84.8%.
3c and Supplementary Data 5 ) relative to Wilms tumours, analysis using GSEA and the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) 27 , 28 toolset also revealed a highly significant enrichment for homeobox proteins (FWER P <0.001; Supplementary Fig. 7 ) and upregulation of distinct classes of homeobox proteins, which are the canonical targets of polycomb-mediated repression.
From this, Bartlett’s test of sphericity statistic was highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating that the data was factorizable.
Using the Mann–Whitney U test, the comparison confirmed a highly significant increase in NEC severity in the NEC group relative to CTRL ( p < 0.001).
For women in the older subgroup (median age > 48 years), the quantile regression coefficient for metabolic syndrome status on right amygdala volume was highly significant (β = −9.41 × 10 −5 , p < 0.001).
All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001) apart from those between birthweight and the 8, 12, 17, and 22 weeks weight of Av BW pigs ( P < 0.05).
The correlation coefficient between growth of new cases and Google search interest (past 7 days) is highly significant ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001).
The differences among the observers in frequency of opportunities to witness HH performances were highly significant; P<0.001.
In addition, results highlight that past exposure to risk while travelling is a highly significant factor distinguishing the tourist segments ( p = 0.001).
Moreover, for the ZPHI set, we observed a highly significant correlation (Spearman ρ = 36; P < .001) between the fraction of ambiguous nucleotides in the pol gene and the diversity of clonal env sequences [ 14 ], which confirms that the fraction of ambiguous nucleotides is a good marker for viral diversity.
A highly significant heterogeneity was observed in these studies ( I 2 = 75%, Q -test p < 0.001); thus, the random-effects model was adopted for analysis.
Statistical comparison of the means using two independent samples t-test shows highly significant differences between the means (p<0.001).
The main effect of the regulation type was found to be highly significant ( F (1,117) = 365.1, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.757): participants reported more positive feelings in the reappraisal block (2.4 ± 0.1) when compared to the passive view block (0.3 ± 0.1).
Repeatability of AOC measures was tested on 62 samples that were assayed in duplicate, and was found to be large and highly significant (R = 0.65, z = 4.29, P<0.001).
Furthermore, the Plant hormone signal transduction pathway (ko04075) exhibited highly significant enrichment (p < 0.001).
In the present work, the level of serum HDL-c showed a positive, highly significant correlation with interstitial testicular tissue area (r=0.73; p<0.001) and STs area (r=0.61; p<0.01).
Figure 2 shows the highly significant main effect of ROI ( F (2, 481) = 547.49, p < .001), with highest responses in the MO region and lowest responses in the LOT region ( t (481) LOT‐MO = −30.98, t (480) LOT‐ROT = −5.26, t (481) ROT‐MO = −25.76, all p Bonferroni < .001).
Linkage disequilibrium, non‐random association among pairs of loci due to lack of recombination, within clone‐corrected haplotypes of these two populations was highly significant ( P < 0.001, in both cases; Table 3 ).
Although the relationship of changes in PPAR γ expression with changes in expression of CPT-1 following treatment were highly significant ( r = 0.95, P < .001), overall the expression of CPT-1 was lower after treatment than before.
Further examination of trends in standardized fruit size across positions in the two environments separately using quadratic regression confirms a negative linear decline in both environments and reveals a highly significant nonlinear (concave) decline in fruit size only for individuals under a constrained season (quadratic parameter estimate = –0.764 ± 0.109, t = 7.00, p < .001) and not under a long season (quadratic parameter estimate = 0.143 ± 0.093, t = 1.54, p = .125).
This was highly significant ( P < 0·001) and was more effective for thin than for thick AKs ( P < 0·001), as has been noted with most other therapies, including PDT. 15 , 16 Our study included hyperkeratotic AKs and acral sites, both of which are associated with higher rates of treatment failure. 6 , 17 AKs larger than the microwave probe diameter were not excluded in this study.