“highly significant”

Test-retest reliabilities were highly significant across AOM timepoints for the risk perception index ( r = 0.814, p < 0.001).

This analysis showed highly significant correlations ( p << 0.001) in the range of 0.87 ≤ r s ≤ 0.90, with an average of 0.89 ± 0.02 among the matrices.

This small difference between the monkeys, however, was highly significant (t-test, t=7.80, df=5921, p<0.001) due to the large number of trials.

The combination of PQR620 with venetoclax showed highly significant differences either versus control or single agents during all days of the experiment (D4, D7, D9, D11, D14; p < 0.001), resulting in an eradication of the implanted tumors in the absence of toxicity.

Toxicology bioassay Exposure of the mites to honey bee venom resulted in a highly significant increase in the percentage of inactive mites compared to the control (approximately 7% vs 0.9%, respectively; GLMM; χ 2 = 12.191, P < 0.001; Fig. 6 a).

Repeated measures ANOVA for reaction times revealed a highly significant main effect of congruency ( F (1,14) = 41.72; p < 0.001), while there was neither a significant main effect of group ( F (1,14) = 2.02; p = 0.18) nor a congruency by group interaction ( F (1,14) = 0.001; p = 0.97).

As Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1 demonstrate, a broad range of phenotypic values were observed for each trait within each environment, and differences among genotypes were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all traits.

Based on diagnosis criteria, there was a highly significant difference in MUAC P value < 0.001) but not for WHZ ( p = 0.056).

All of the associations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Proteinuria emerged as a highly significant risk factor (AOR = 10.72; 95% CI: 5.74–20.04; P < 0.001), underscoring its central role as both a marker and contributor to renal damage.

However, the difference in benthic community composition between habitats was highly significant (R = 0.8, p = 0.001).

In the overarching analysis across all data at follow-up, SC-BCTs produced a highly significant ( P < 0.001) small effect relative to passive control conditions ( g = 0.10; 95% CI, 0.06–0.13; k = 13; I 2 = 0%).

The difference was highly significant (t = -6.116, p < 0.001).

The intragroup comparison of the CFU/mL count showed a highly significant reduction from baseline to post-intervention for both the groups ( p = 0.001).

It is noteworthy that the difference between UVB-L and UVB-M treatments was, in all cases, highly significant (from p < 0.001 to p < 0.0001), especially during days 12 and 24 of UVB exposure.

Highly significant genetic variations ( p < 0.001) were observed for BSR disease incidence (DI) in all field screening tests and disease rating and area under the disease progress curve in the greenhouse.

Results The statistical comparison between groups I, II, III, and IV casts measurements by using the Mann–Whitney test showed highly significant statistical difference between the various groups from each other ( p < 0.001) Conclusion The accuracy of the working casts obtained from group III impression (two-step using 1 mm coping) was the best, whereas it was least with group II impression (two-step using polyethylene spacer).

In MCF7 cells, the combined treatment effect was slight at 500 nM doxorubicin ( P = .082), and highly significant at 1500 nM doxorubicin ( P < .001).

Most participants (82.4%) had experience of caring for a dying patient, while fewer (22.1%) had cared for a dying patient within the last month. Construct validity The KMO value of the nurse-specific EPCS-C was 0.964 and Bartlett’s test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

4) We found highly significant differences for smoking-related VOCs such as acetonitrile, benzene and cyclohexadiene (p<0.001, respectively) between active smokers and non-smokers ( figure 1a ).

Similarly, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation between FACIT-F and physical (+0.70) and emotional scores (+0.45) of QOL.

The sum total properties of Padmapatradi yoga is tikta katu rasa , laghu and tikna guna (light and penetrating properties), ushna virya (hot potency) and vatakaphagna (decrease vata and kapha dosa) Padmapatradi yoga is effective in increased peak expiratory flow rate, breath holding time, and reduces the absolute eosinophil count of studied cases and also found statistically highly significant at p<0.001 level.

SOD activity reached the highest level at the maximal Hg concentration (265.71 ± 7.82 U g –1 min –1 ), and the difference in SOD activity among different Hg treatments was highly significant ( F = 28.755, P < 0.001).

As expected, the difference in FA levels between formalin-employers and non-employers proved to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Moreover, the mGPS group was a highly significant predictor for survival after GKRS1 (p < 0.001) with a HR of 2.501 (95%CI = 1.582–3.954; p < 0.001).