“highly significant”

Differences between groups of * P ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant, ** P ≤0.01 were considered highly significant. *** P ≤0.001 were considered very highly significant. 3 Results 3.1 Fabrication for the bone adhesive After mixing the PEG-SG and TA, a porous bone adhesive was formed due to hydrogen bond interactions among the polymers ( Fig.

The CD4 depletion remained highly significant in the duodenum of virally suppressed participants ( P < 0.001), but it was less pronounced in the colon and no longer reached statistical significance ( P = 0.1).

The effects of treatment were highly significant on the number of pear psylla eggs (χ 2 = 15.3, P < 0.001; Fig. 2B ) but not on the number of pear psylla nymphs (χ 2 = 2.61, P = 0.27) or adults (χ 2 = 1.30, P = 0.52) ( Figs 2C and D ).

On Doppler evaluation exhibit highly significant reduction in peak early filling velocity (PE) (p<0.001) and early filling time velocity integral (Ei) (p<0.001).

Thus, we observed weak enrichment of strain-specific variants at sex-biased CREs when considering the full eQTL regions, but found a highly significant, 2.5-fold enrichment within intra-TAD intervals (p<0.001 for intra-TAD interval variants vs p = 0.278 genome-wide).

The model is as follows: Survival ~ sex + ( 1 | patRIL ) + ( 1 | RIL : vial ) + ( 1 | RIL : sex ) + ( 1 | group ) + ( 1 | set : group ) The fixed effect of sex was highly significant ( z = −8.0, P < 0.001).

DMRs in SAS fish were twice as frequently hypo-methylated relative to wild fish than hyper-methylated and this difference was highly significant (68%: 193/284 hypo-DMRs; 32%: 91/284 hyper-DMRs; binomial P -value < 0.001).

In terms of bacteria ( Figure 3 ), almost all α -diversity indices displayed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between group S_0 and groups K3, K4, and K8.

RM-ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of session, F (19, 285) = 37.18, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.71, which reflected a significant linear increase, F (1, 15) = 81.01, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.84, and a significant quadratic pattern, F (1, 15) = 11.30, p = .004, η p 2 = 0.43. 3.2 Transfer task performance Table 2 shows the score on each of the outcome measures, separately for each group and assessment session.

The difference in risk of relapse between the G2I-1 and G2I-2 tumors was borderline significant (Odd ratio: 0.16 [0.2-1.2] p = 0.08) whereas that between the G2I-2 and G2I-3 tumors was highly significant (odd ratio: 8.5 [3.2-22.6] p < 0.001) in univariate analysis.

Even after controlling for the state fixed effects, the positive effect of the peer score—the average transparency score of all other hospitals in the same HRR—remained highly significant (0.42; P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant correlation between T I and V T in all groups (p<0.001).

saxicola with differences between the species being highly significant ( Fig. 3 , t-test: t = −22.0, d.f. = 24, P <0.001).

In addition, in the comparison of CI, NCI, and HCs,the results showed a highly significant statistical difference in Sema3A levels among the three groups (p < 0.001, Supplementary Table 3 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between HbA1c and FPG, as shown in Figure 1 (r 2 =0.86; P <0.001).

MHco3/18.F 1 observed heterozygote frequency of 15 (13.6 expected according to HWE) at codon 167 was not significant but at codon 200 was highly significant (χ 2 = 66.47, p < 0.001) with 77 observed heterozygotes (40 expected).

On the other hand, caterpillars occurred with a much higher frequency in deep chambers (15.8%) than in mid-depth (7.7%) or superficial (0.7%) chambers, differences that were highly significant (Pearson Chi-square= 14.86; d.f = 2; p < 0.001).

The ANOVA revealed that highly significant variations ( p < 0.001) among the finger millet genotypes, the environments in which the genotypes were tested, and the GEI showed the highest sum square for grain yield.

These changes represented about 20% and 40% rises relative to the pre-dialysis and pre-reinfusion PAP values, respectively, and were highly significant relative to baseline ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

While CSA exposure status was highly significant in this combined sample ( P <0.001), there was no indication of an additional effect attributable to the familial environment ( P = 0.406) based on results from generalized mixed-effect models.

impatiens We found a highly significant effect of ouabain concentration on THS in B. impatiens after controlling for consumption ( F 8,152 = 18.2, p < 0.001) (Figure 1A ).

Analysing the two sampling intervals separately showed a highly significant relationship of detected numbers of pesticides and agricultural production area in May ( p < 0.001) but not in August (SOM Table A8 ).

Intra‐individual analysis using the Greenhouse–Geisser correction showed that the temporal changes in adiponectin levels among subjects were highly significant ( F (1.583, 33.246) = 185.50, p < 0.001).

The relationship between the test variables and the response variables (yield) was established using multiple regression analysis, resulting in the following secondary‐order polynomial equation: Y = − 56.61834 + 0.071432 X 1 + 0.81887 X 2 + 0.43497 X 3 + 115.5413 X 4 − 4.50 × 1.0 − 5 X 1 X 2 + 4.46 × 10 − 3 X 1 X 3 + 0.030250 X 1 X 4 − 7.74 × 10 − 3 X 2 X 3 + 0.27850 X 2 X 4 − 0.598 X 3 X 4 − 4.69 × 1.0 − 3 X 1 2 − 0.014878 X 2 2 − 5.88 × 1.0 − 4 X 3 2 − 74.4325 X 4 2 The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the regression equation reveals that both linear and quadratic terms were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating the robustness of the model (Table 3 ).

In Aβ rats, there was a highly significant level of NO in all the brain parts studied; hippocampus (92.30 ± 6.41 μmol/L, P < 0.001), PFC (71.09 ± 10.23 μmol/L, P < 0.001), septum (85.20 ± 4.13 μmol/L, P < 0.001), when compared with other experimental groups.