“highly significant”

Among 137 females with MCs, 98 patients (72%) reported LBP, compared 39 patients (28%) without, with a highly significant association (p < 0.001).

NKs and MCs alone had a highly significant intrinsic ability to kill infected cells ( Figure 4A , no serum/effectors compared to effectors + control serum, P < 0.001) whereas PMNs showed a modest but insignificant trend to intrinsic killing (no serum/effectors compared to effectors + control serum P > 0.05).

In all twelve (species × methodology) cases from cattle MS through to chicken SNP, differences in F st between spatial relationships were highly significant ( p < 0.001; Kruskal-Wallis statistic, d.f. in brackets, respectively, 201.59 (5), 1165.5 (5), 186.71 (6), 1117.9 (6), 914.75 (6), 19.39 (5), 249.67 (5), 1605.03 (6), 207.23 (6), 120.45 (6), 196.11 (6), 107.11 (6)).

Trial number was always an informative predictor of response times that was retained in all stepwise model simplifications, and was a highly significant predictor of reduced capture times over successive slides in all models where the interaction between trial number and treatment were dropped (in all cases p<0.001).

More specifically, right kidney viscosity increased from stage 1 (1.71±0.11 Pa·s) to stage 5 (2.36±0.21 Pa·s), showing highly significant intergroup differences (MANOVA: F =316.48, P<0.001), whereas left kidney viscosity similarly progressed from stage 1 (1.72±0.13 Pa·s) to stage 5 (2.33±0.25 Pa·s) (MANOVA: F =238.93, P<0.001).

Results: Independent t-tests revealed a highly significant reduction in microhardness (p < 0.001) in the case groups compared with the control groups for all materials.

7-KDCA showed the largest reduction (fold change = 0.004), accompanied by a high VIP score and a highly significant P value ( P < 0.001).

In the 80 mg/kg group, the tumor volume was 671.82 ± 435.43 mm3, and the relative tumor proliferation rate was 58.03%, showing a highly significant statistical difference compared to the model control group ( P < 0.001).

The effect of Block was highly significant, F (19, 304) = 21.175, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.57.

Serum PSA levels were markedly elevated in PCa-DM compared to PCa+DM and BPH, with the difference being highly significant (F = 58.95, p < 0.001).

Although more than half of RILs ripened under 27°C in 2006, the correlation coefficient of the occurrence of WBK between 2006 and 2008 was highly significant ( r = 0.80, P < 0.001).

The main effect of the regulation type was found to be highly significant ( F (1,117) = 365.1, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.757): participants reported more positive feelings in the reappraisal block (2.4 ± 0.1) when compared to the passive view block (0.3 ± 0.1).

A highly significant heterogeneity was observed in these studies ( I 2 = 75%, Q -test p < 0.001); thus, the random-effects model was adopted for analysis.

For statistical interpretation, P<0.05 (*) is considered significant, p<0.01 (**) is considered highly significant, and P<0.001 (***) is considered very highly significant.

Comparisons between the different treatment groups were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and the least significant difference (LSD), and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 * and highly significant at p < 0.001.

A one-way related-means analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant effect of masker condition [F(2,10) = 58.07, p < 0.001].

From this, Bartlett’s test of sphericity statistic was highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating that the data was factorizable.

Molecular subtype analysis revealed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001); 79.4% of patients in the low Ki67 proliferation index group were classified as luminal subtype, whereas only 58.6% of those in the high Ki67 proliferation index group fell into this category.

Correlations were highly significant (p<0.001) in all groups.

3, B and C ), a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

Interestingly, a highly significant linear correlation was found between Caco-2 cell membrane TAA and cytoprotective activity for both the WL ( r = −0.93, P < 0.001 at Pearson's correlation coefficient) and RL ( r = −0.91, P < 0.001) extracts.

In contrast, TF–target association is highly significant in samples with high methylation levels (robust linear model P -value = 0.001).

Quantification of the midbrain cluster (boxed) showed a highly significant difference between the selamectin-treated and the control ( Figure 11C , n =20, t -test, p<0.001).

The results in Table 3 yielded a highly significant chi-square value with χ 2 [1, N = 1319] = 224.8738, P ≤ 0.001.

Bacterial community differences were highly significant between strains from 4 to 20 weeks of age (ranging from p = 0.001–0.01).