“highly significant”

Similarly, there was a larger, highly significant correlation between the number of ratings reported in the Google Play and Apple App Stores ( r =0.87; P <.001; 116/154, 75.3%), which, in turn, was significantly correlated with the number of installs (Google Play ratings: r =0.96; P <.001; 150/154, 97.4%; Apple App Store ratings: r =0.90; P <.001; 120/154, 77.9%).

The difference in prevalence of multipartite medial and lateral epicondyles was highly significant in patients without any history of an elbow fracture ( p < 0.001).

Similarly, the environment effect was highly significant (P ≤ 0.001, P ≤ 0.01, and P ≤ 0.05) for all the evaluated traits except for 4 traits (LA, LL, LW, SD) in ‘1-XY’בN188’, two trait (H, PL) in ‘ZL-3’בN188’, another trait (H) in both ‘ZL-3’בN188’ and the joint family.

Additionally, there was a statistically highly significant increase of seizure incidence in the patient group with other diagnoses, i.e. fractures and haematomas (8/25; 32%) than those with concussion (14/172; 8.1%)(P<0.001).

Regression analysis revealed highly significant (P<0.001 in all cases) linear relationships between the frequency of body undulations with tail excursions>90° and metabolic rate ( Fig. 3 ).

2023, highly significant ( p = 0.001), with 2020 higher; 2021 vs. 2022, highly significant ( p = 0.001), with 2021 higher; 2021 vs. 2023, highly significant ( p < 0.001), with 2021 higher.

There was a highly significant association between f-Hb concentration and increasing ‘severity’ of colonoscopic findings from no pathology to other pathology to significant bowel disease ( p < 0.001).

Pairwise Mann-Whitney post hoc analysis revealed consistent and highly significant differences between distilled water and all staining solutions across all time intervals (p < 0.001).

In particular, all aspects of achievement motivation exhibit highly significant gender differences ( p < 0.001), with a moderate impact size.

This disparity became more pronounced at 8 weeks post-treatment, where the IMT group achieved significantly lower PTA values than the ST group, showing a highly significant difference (t = 6.306, p < 0.001).

However, linear regressions demonstrated highly significant relationships of age with YR ( t = 14.1, p < 0.001) and with LTH ( t = 9.4, p < 0.001), an anticipated unavoidable severe bias for which we have used statistical correction.

This analysis yielded a highly significant difference in reaction times, t (49) = −6.31, p < 0.001 ( Table 3 ).

In comparison, expenses increased to 44.03% (from $211,404 to $304,491), with both changes highly significant (p<.001).

This drop is highly significant ( P < 0.001) and confirms our previous data showing that ASAP/MAP9 protein expression is highly decreased in the colon cell lines tested [ 27 ].

The genetic differentiation between goat and sheep was not significant (P = 0.1318) whereas the values obtained for the other comparisons were highly significant (P < 0.001).

Paired CT and UPI data were available for 16 patients with highly significant correlation between right and left midbrain regions ( R 0.92, p < 0.001) confirming the accuracy of UPI-TTP measurements.

Asterisks (***) denote highly significant differences between groups ( p < 0.001). 3.

The decrease of spectral spread in oCIs compared to eCI was highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.3.

The results of the ANOVA omnibus test for the slope parameter are highly significant ( F(9, 166) = 13.15, p <.001 ).

The model performance was decreased compared to the full model but still highly significant ( r = 0.53, P < 0.001).

A highly significant negative correlation was identified in both groups between all the assessed aspects of professional education and years of service (0.9 ≤ |R| < 1, p = 0.001).

healthy control subjects, and between the people with ME/CFS and healthy control subjects, was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant effects of mixed rearing ( p < 0.001) and sex ( p < 0.001) were observed on the backfat thickness.

So, controlling for depression, there was no main effect for group [arousal: F (1, 38) = 0.54, p = 0.47; valence: F (1, 38) = 0.70, p = 0.41] or interaction effects group x task [arousal: F (1, 38) = 0.23, p = 0.63; valence: F (1, 38) = 1.41, p = 0.24], whereas effects of task were highly significant [arousal: F (1, 38) = 63.18, p < 0.001; valence: F (1, 38) = 58.23, p < 0.001].

The pairwise comparison of mortality rates showed no significant differences between defoliation classes 1 and 2, but there were highly significant differences between all other combinations of defoliation classes ( P < 0.001).