Despite these inherent constraints, transfer of human NLV-specific T cells led to prolonged survival, which was modest at very high initial virus burden and did not reach statistical significance ( Fig 7A ) but was highly significant (P < 0.001 by log-rank test as well as by Gehan-Wilcoxon test) at a moderate, more realistic, initial virus dose ( Fig 7B ; see Discussion ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
For the cellular component, GO terms such as cell periphery (GO:0071944), cell cortex (GO:0005938), exocyst (GO:0000145), and vesicle tethering complex (GO:0099023) were identified as highly significant, with a P -value of < 0.001 ( Table 5 ; Figure 8 ). 4.
From the cross-lagged path diagram, it can be seen that the autoregressive coefficients for negative emotions and health-promoting behaviors at the two measurement time points were stable and highly significant, with β = 0.43 ( P < 0.001) and β = 0.36 ( P < 0.001), respectively.
Model for deaths The median age, prevalence of obesity among adults, population density, GDP per capita, and dependency ratio were positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting a strong association with dengue fatality.
ANOVA found a highly significant difference in the inhibition rates of the extracts and eserine [ F (5, 12) = 3,414.51, p < 0.001].
The differences in mean daily egg production were highly significant between strains at different density treatments (p <0.001).
(4) There was a highly significant positive correlation between most of the variables ( P < 0.001), such as bud width and average bud wall thickness ( r = 0.84), stylar orifice width and style width ( r = 0.77), ovule length and bud length ( r = 0.74).
Measuring respiration rate in flies housed under laboratory conditions A highly significant gender effect on BM was observed, with female flies being significantly heavier ( F = 700.8, P < 0.001; Fig. 3 A) compared to males, although no significant treatment ( F = 0.589, P = 0.560) or sex × treatment interaction effect ( P > 0.05) was seen.
However, sensitivity analyses indicated the presence of pleiotropy, as Cochran’s Q and Rücker’s Q′ were both highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S7 ).
Among all the scoring items, 10 out of 13 items showed statistically significant differences between groups ( p < 0.05 ), and 5 items exhibited highly significant differences (i, t, ptc, g, mm, p < 0.001 ).
2 ), with replicates as a random effect and seed host and feeding choice as fixed factors, showed highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) on eggs per seed, emergence holes, egg density, hatching success, and PAR (%).
The path from childhood adversity to the mediator, emotional dysregulation, was also highly significant (a-path: B = 0.75, p < 0.001), as was the path from the mediator to negative urgency, controlling for adversity (b-path: B = 0.41, p < 0.001).
Clinical insight remained highly significant (aOR = 138.68; 95% CI = 17.53–1097.05; P < 0.001), even after the inclusion of SoI and adjusting for other variables.
Results Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) between the control and schizophrenia groups in the first sensory threshold measurement, as well as across all four anhedonia domains ( Table 2 ).
001, see also the highly significant clip-type × movement-type interaction ( F (1,13)=105.8, P <0.001, all post hoc tests P values <0.001): this shows that during correction-power grips, participants were truly performing a movement correction, changing trajectory from a higher (that is, precision grip position) to a lower one (that is, power grip position) during the reaching phase.
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.
CADI Sinhala showed a strong and highly significant correlation with the Sinhala DLQI (Spearman’s rho = 0.66; P< 0.001) indicating concurrent validity.
One-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant overall difference in MDA levels across the different stages of CKD (f=9.89, p<0.001).
GmHsp 21.3 exhibited the highest fold change in diapause individuals which was highly significant (t = -35.74, df = 8, p < 0.001), and together with five other genes showed upregulated expression during diapause.
Time trends were highly significant for all sex and BMI categories ( p < 0.001 ).
Moreover, the results demonstrate the presence of a highly significant decrease in WBCs in the relapsed patients in comparison with that of the non-relapsed patients (p < 0.001).
Differences between groups of ∗ P <0.05 were considered statistically significant, ∗∗ P <0.01 were considered highly significant, ∗∗∗ P <0.001 were considered very highly significant. 3.
A meta-analysis revealed substantial heterogeneity in the maximum temperature-HSAD associations across prefectures, with an I 2 of 82.2% and a highly significant Cochran's Q test ( p -value < 0.001).
A one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in the concentrations of both α-chaconine and α-solanine and across the three sampling intervals (30, 45, and 60 days).
The increase in the mean external standard score over 4 months from 50.0 to 54.8 is highly significant, P < 0.001, showing that an improvement in quality of life has taken place.