Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Phenotypic Performance and Variance Components Very high heritabilities across locations for both seed yield (0.90) and protein content (0.94) in conjunction with a lower, however highly significant ( p < 0.001), genotype-by-location interaction variance component ( σ G L 2 ), illustrate a moderate level of genotype-by-location interaction ( Table 2 ).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on these results, we retained three NTB variables (semantic fluency, immediate word list recall, and delayed word list recall) that were highly significant predictors (all p < .001) with excellent fit (Max‐rescaled R ‐square = 0.72, Hosmer–Lemeshow Goodness‐of‐fit (GOF) χ 2 = 8.25, p = .41; Max‐rescaled R‐square = 0.66, Hosmer–Lemeshow GOF χ 2 = 8.17, p = .41) for dementia and CI (dementia status and CIND status combined), respectively, within the ADAMS data.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Primary outcome Vertical skeletal measurements According to the analysis of the pre- and post-treatment 3D cephalometric measurements, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed in the angle between the mandibular and SN planes, which increased by a mean of 0.82 ± 1.37°.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
○ Male (χ 2 = 79.939, df = 4, p < 0.001): the social status distribution is also significantly different among male patients, with a highly significant p -value. - Marital Status ○ Female (χ 2 = 15.643, df = 2, p < 0.001): marital status is significantly associated with gender, indicating differences in marital status distribution among females. ○ Male (χ 2 = 110.899, df = 3, p < 0.001): marital status shows a strong association with gender in mal
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Birth weight showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on D0–3, D4–60, and D0–90, and a significant ( p = 0.008) effect on D61–90, with estimates ranging from −0.33 to −0.44 and ORs ranging from 0.65 to 0.72, suggesting that increased birth weight is linked to reduced mortality risk.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Specifically, the unclassified Glomeraceae , unclassified Glomeromycota , Glomus , unclassified Glomeromycetes , unclassified Glomerales and Dominikia exhibited stronger correlations with various traits, showing highly significant positive correlations with SRL, SRA, RN, RP, CT:1/2SD and MYC ( P < 0.001), and showing significant positive correlations with MDCC ( P < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Crucially, however, when adding the dummy variable (with D = 1 if the observation was a response to a non-symbolic stimulus, and D = 0 if it was a response to a symbolic stimulus) the weight of the dummy x logarithmic interaction was highly significant ( B D x log = 0.029, st. error = 0.006, t ratio = 4.727, df = 22, p < 0.001), confirming that significant differences in logarithmic compression do exist between fast responses to non-symbolic and symbolic stimuli.