“highly significant”

Psychosocial characteristics and life satisfaction All variables included as psychosocial characteristics exhibited highly significant associations with life satisfaction: perceived stress (p<0.001), depression (p<0.001), suicidal ideation (p<0.001), K-MMSE (p<0.01), subjective health status (p<0.001), family satisfaction (p<0.001), and income satisfaction (p<0.01).

Moreover, there were highly significant total effects of -SH groups ( t = −5.62, p < 0.001) on the TLE-PP phenome that were mediated by MDA ( t = −3.48, p = 0.001) and the path from CMPAase to MDA ( t = 3.41, p = 0.001).

The obtained p-values were highly significant for the comparison of the group with amalgam fillings and the group without fillings (p<0.001), that is, for the comparison of the group with amalgam fillings and the group with composite fillings (p<0.001).

The differences in antimicrobial activity between the groups were highly significant ( p <0.001) as presented in the Table 3 .

There was a highly significant trend of increasing risk with decreased parity (P<0.001), and a significantly decreased risk with women having a multiple birth (standardised incidence ratio 0.42 (0.14 to 0.99); table 3 ).

However, during first follow up observations, patient reported QoL average scores upon VAS scale were 59.97 ± 6.79 in the control study arm with 63.11 ± 5.20 in the interventional study arm that was statistical highly significant values ( p < 0.001 , df-19.79).

Regarding lipid profile, there was highly significant increase of CHOL, TG and LDL in group B compared to group A and control group (p-value < 0.001).

Trade-offs and synergies between ESs There is a similarity in the trade-offs and synergies between ESs at the county and sub-watershed scales, with most ESs showing a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001).

The difference between the spontaneous cure (of the control animals) and cure of the treated cows was highly significant ( P <0.001).

The test for subgroup differences was highly significant (Q = 39.18, df = 2, p < 0.001), underscoring the variability in vaccination rates across continents (specifically between Asia, Europe vs.

The Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient between Johns Hopkins and Tom Baker values was highly significant in a positive direction ( r =0.764, P <0.001), indicating a high degree of similarity in the distress levels of patients within different cancer diagnoses at both institutions.

When comparing consanguineous and nonconsanguineous marriages in parents of the cleft and control groups, the association between consanguineous marriage and the occurrence of clefts was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Differences were considered significant as follows: * means 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 significant; ** means 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 highly significant and *** means p < 0.001 very highly significant; ns: indicates not significant. 3.

Results and discussion Medicinal plants diversity and Ethnobotanical knowledge There was a highly significant difference between age of respondents and knowledge of medicinal plants (Wilcoxon's test, p < 0.001).

Statistical versus practical significance: As noted in Table 2 , the p-values for pre- and post-event comparisons of all subgroups, as well as the overall population, were highly significant (p < 0.001), which may reflect large sample sizes and/or meaningful shifts [ 50 ].

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were determined in concentration, type of solvent, and extraction time regarding Ae. aegypti mortality for the two species.

For the investigated time frame, a highly significant decrease ( p = 0.001) in survival rate of CAP treated eggs was observed.

A significantly higher proportion (112; 88%) belonged to laborer categories (skilled/unskilled/Agriculture labor) when compared to other occupations (small or large business, private or government services) [16; 12%] with this difference is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Behavioral data analysis Behavioral analyses demonstrated systematic variations across occlusion levels, with repeated-measures ANOVAs (Greenhouse-Geisser corrected) revealing highly significant main effects on all measured parameters: NASA-TLX scores (F(2,128) = 38.40, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.375), recognition accuracy (F(2,128) = 616.95, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.906), and reaction time (F(2,128) = 244.43, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.792) (Fig. 8 ).

Other compared pairs demonstrated statistically highly significant difference in release results (p <0 .001).

There was a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in knowledge by location.

Moreover, the lag coefficients of both SLM and SEM, namely Lambda and Rho, were highly significant (P < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

PGE2 levels showed a highly significant difference (p=0.001) with a large effect size (η2=0.91).

Sperm morphology The percentage of normal sperm morphology in animals treated with DXM alone also showed a highly significant difference (p<0.001) when compared to the control group.

The dramatic reductions in viral titers were highly significant compared to hamsters that were treated with the PBS placebo ( P < 0.001).