“highly significant”

All participants had highly significant changes (p < 0.001) in PPD scores (mean change −10.63, SD 1.44).

Notably, the coefficient for proportion Native American is negative and highly significant ( p < 0.001) in Model 2, indicating a negative association between the percentage of the population that is Native American and the count of lysosomal storage disorders tested.

The differences were noted highly significant ( P < 0.001) for RCI in water depth, nutrients and species and were noted significant ( P < 0.01) in the interaction among water depth, nutrients, species and their interaction (Table 1 ).

These estimates suggest a very strong and highly significant ( F -statistic = 9.5659, P = 0.001) association between the adaptive genetic variation and the environment.

Statistical significance in pairwise comparisons of progression to CIN3+ vs regression to <CIN1 was found with EPB41L3 alone ( P = .02), while for the full S5 classifier, the difference was highly significant ( P = .001).

Highly significant (at P < 0.001) Pearson’s correlation coefficients between IR, DS, and COI across four environments showed positive correlations ( Supplementary Table S6 and Figure 3B ).

Comparison between months for both variables confirmed highly significant differences (pairwise comparisons – Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment: all P <0.001).

Bartlet’s test of sphericity was highly significant at p < 0.001, indicating that the data were appropriate for PCA.

Whereas both blood group O and B patients possess circulating seric anti‐A, it appears and it is statistically highly significant ( P < 0·001) that O group patients are underrepresented (49·4 % vs. 57·6%), whereas B group patients are, on the contrary, overrepresented (50·6% vs. 42·4%), meaning that anti‐A from O is more protective than anti‐A from B.

Results were considered statistically significant with the value of ( p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant with the p value ≤ 0.001.

A highly significant QTL for presence of spots and vermiculations mapped to a sex-averaged position of 3 cM on Sna3 (VPA1, 95% CI = 0-4.485 cM, LOD = 6.563, P = 0.001).

However, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease (by 80%) in the median electrical threshold in Aβfiber nociceptors ( Figure 4A ).

For the whole cohort (independently from BB) we could demonstrate a highly significant improvement for LS and TAS over time (t0/t1-t4; ANOVA, p<0,001).

Both DT.h and GMP were always highly significant ( P < 0.001) and had maximum importance (i.e. importance = 1), which indicated they were included in all of the models selected for the averaging process.

The difference in the duration of motor block was highly significant statistically ( p value < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].

The majority (70.6%) of women with PPD had a history of adverse life events, which was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).

The association of MVPs with various histological types was also highly significant (p<.001).

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that both the treatment protocol and the species of bacteria as well as the interaction between treatment and species of bacteria had highly significant effects on the viability of the cariogenic bacteria in planktonic and biofilm form ( p < 0.001).

For MsbZIP79 , the upregulation was highly significant ( p < 0.001); however, it was not the same for MsbZIP222 .

The effects of the environment, genotype and GEI were highly significant (p = 0.001) for both observed and simulated grain yields.

The volume increase represents an average growth of 17.52 nm 3 per second and the volume increase is highly significant compared to the first time point ( p < 0.001).

The differences were defined as statistically significant (* p < 0.05), highly significant (** p < 0.01), and extremely significant (*** p < 0.001).

The highly significant main effect of Goal Type, F (1, 104) = F (1, 104) = 19.69, p < .001, η p 2 = .159, indicated that participants adopted (falsely self-ascribed) more recommendations of intrinsic compared to extrinsic goals: M intrinsic = 46.45% (24.65) vs.

Comparison of manual mRNA-ISH scoring categories and SP1 and 6F11 IHC H-scores showed a highly significant relationship ( P <0.001).

In a multivariate model combining the 48-genes predictor, age, sex and blood cell composition, the 48-genes predictor remained highly significant of severe outcome against mild outcome (logistic regression p- value < 0.001; Table 2 ).