“highly significant”

The depths avowed more highly significant (p < 0.001) SOC stocks in topsoils (0–30 cm depth) than that of the subsoils (30–60 cm depth) in the two cropping systems.

All F ST were highly significant (P < 0.001) based on permutation test.

Abdominal girth showed a highly significant response to CNM supplementation ( p < 0.001), along with a significant treatment × time interaction ( p = 0.025).

The difference between the energy availability groups was highly significant (p<0.001).

The difference between the mean blood pressures of the groups in Tables V and VI was highly significant (P < 0.001).

Moreover, the actual BMI showed a highly significant strong correlation with the BID ( r = 0.57, p < 0.001).

The regression coefficient calculated for this association was highly significant by Student's t-test (P < 0.001).

These differences were highly significant (P < 0.001) in each instance.

Correlation of GR with FW and SL was highly significant ( P < 0.001), while GR with ChlC was also significant ( P < 0.01).

There was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) reduction in the numbers of S .

5 ) revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) difference in gold content after cell treatment with 5a and 5b,c for 6 h.

In contrast, highly significant correlations were found between MNSIQ scores and corneal nerve fiber parameters, including the CNFD, CNBD, and CNFL, in both the paracentral (all p < 0.001) and inferior-whorl regions ( p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively).

This difference was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant ( P < 0.001) differences in all properties [ Table 2 ].

Results: There was a highly significant increase in a protein expression of PDFG-B in all cases of acute and chronic venous thrombosis compared to the control group with P < 0.001; furthermore, it was more specific than DD for the detection of DVT (specificity 95% and 90%, respectively).

In fact, for most of the pairwise comparisons between staining methods we observed a large proportion of highly significant differences ( Figure 3 , Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.001, corrected).

We first observed that TCM display less CXCR6+ cells than TTM with a highly significant difference (median 2.8% versus 4.3%, respectively; p = 0.001) ( Fig 8A ).

The χ 2 statistics comparing differences between groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all characteristics presented in Table 1 except body mass index ( χ 2 = 4.8, p = 0.2).

In each allogenic one-way MLC there is highly significant stimulation (P < 0.001) between any two of these four strains.

Highly significant changes were found at all the follow-ups (p < 0.001).

These relationships were further quantified by comparing the change index during ICMS with the change index post-ICMS, revealing a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001, Figure 4 L).

Comparison of vitamin D level and echocardiographic parameters before and after intervention The mean Vitamin D level surged from 15.93 ± 3.61 (range, 9–22) ng/ml before intervention to 38.39 ± 3.95 (range, 31–45) ng/ml after intervention, showing a highly significant substantial improvement ( p < 0.001) (Figure 1 ).

A highly significant negative correlation of femoral offset and CTA as well as positive correlation of CCD and CTA could be observed (femoral offset and CTA: r = − 0.63, p ≤ 0.001; CCD and CTA: r = 0.54, p ≤ 0.001).

A highly significant ( P < 0.001; t test) perijunctional increase of 1.5–2-fold was seen for VGSCs, ankyrin G , and β-spectrin, but not for dystrophin (Fig. 9 ).

One-way ANOVA demonstrated highly significant relationships ( P < 0.001) across all ISWD and ISWD%pred bands with WHO FC, baseline resting Borg score, and baseline pulmonary hemodynamic parameters ( Fig. 2 ).